HSM 270 Evaluation Plan
Evaluation Plan
HSM/270
January 11th, 2013
Melvin Green
1. Objective is to ensure these students are still learning and improving their English skills along the way.
2. Pre-testing would be implemented to see where they stand and how far they still need to go.
a. They would implement this through interviews and surveys taken by the students and their parents as well.
b. Surveys will also be taken by the teaching staff to ensure both students and faculty is on the same track.
3. Create a timeline as to where they are at on their skills and to where they need or should be along the way.
a. During this time evaluations will need to take place as mentioned above through interviews and surveys.
b. Post-testing will also need to be implemented at the end of the courses to ensure they got the knowledge they needed out of the classes.
4. A project-wide evaluation plan will be in place to help ensure the process is continuing on the correct path.
Evaluation Questions
Source of Information
Method
Timeline
Responsible person
How far did the students come along during these courses and what all have they learned?
Students that were involved in the course.
The achievements.
The teachers
The parents
Participation in the course from the students.
Involvement of the teachers and of the parents.
Throughout the school year.
Teachers
Students
Parents
Coordinator of the project
Are the student overall more efficient in English and have a better grasp on the schooling here now?
Students
Teachers
Parents
Pre-testing
Post-testing
Surveys
Interviews
On-going
End of the year evaluation
Students
Parents
Teachers
Project coordinator
School Faculty including principle
Reference (Yuen, F. & Terao, K. (2003). Practical grant writing & program evaluation. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole—Thomson Learning.)
This would be an example of the evaluation given.
Depending on test scores and the interviews given, the improvements could be taken place
HSM/270
January 11th, 2013
Melvin Green
1. Objective is to ensure these students are still learning and improving their English skills along the way.
2. Pre-testing would be implemented to see where they stand and how far they still need to go.
a. They would implement this through interviews and surveys taken by the students and their parents as well.
b. Surveys will also be taken by the teaching staff to ensure both students and faculty is on the same track.
3. Create a timeline as to where they are at on their skills and to where they need or should be along the way.
a. During this time evaluations will need to take place as mentioned above through interviews and surveys.
b. Post-testing will also need to be implemented at the end of the courses to ensure they got the knowledge they needed out of the classes.
4. A project-wide evaluation plan will be in place to help ensure the process is continuing on the correct path.
Evaluation Questions
Source of Information
Method
Timeline
Responsible person
How far did the students come along during these courses and what all have they learned?
Students that were involved in the course.
The achievements.
The teachers
The parents
Participation in the course from the students.
Involvement of the teachers and of the parents.
Throughout the school year.
Teachers
Students
Parents
Coordinator of the project
Are the student overall more efficient in English and have a better grasp on the schooling here now?
Students
Teachers
Parents
Pre-testing
Post-testing
Surveys
Interviews
On-going
End of the year evaluation
Students
Parents
Teachers
Project coordinator
School Faculty including principle
Reference (Yuen, F. & Terao, K. (2003). Practical grant writing & program evaluation. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole—Thomson Learning.)
This would be an example of the evaluation given.
Depending on test scores and the interviews given, the improvements could be taken place