Preview

How Did Rainsford Kill General Zaroff

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Rainsford Kill General Zaroff
Rainsford wants to defend himself, which is why he would execute General Zaroff. Perhaps the most obvious piece of evidence states "Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder,"(lines 381-382). To spice it up, instead of hunting animals, General Zaroff hunts humans, and chases them. Rainsford thinks that it is a joke. General Zaroff has humans in his basement waiting for the hunting game to begin. It is clear that since he kills humans, he will probably kill Rainsford. In order to stop this 'dangerous' game, Rainsford has to kill General Zaroff. This also supports that he killed General Zaroff because he wanted to save the peoples lives that were about to die for no reason. One of the most damaging pieces of evidence is "The fellow

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When Rainsford made a lot of different trials, to throw General Zaroff but he still found him in the tree.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is a lot of simalaritys and difference between the two characters, M0ntresor in the cask of allmontiallo and General Zaroff in the most dangerous game. Montresor had his murder all planned out includeing every small detail. General Zaroff had never even planned on killing Rainsford because rainsford appeared out of nowhere to him and Zaroff wanted to hunt with Rainsford not hunt him. The reason Zaroff wanted to hunt Rainsford was because Rinsford refused to hunt with him.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford.”... “He had never slept in a better bed”. (Connell 41) There were some of last few sentences of the story provided a somewhat cryptic ending. This meant that Rainsford had beat Zaroff. Since Zaroff was beat by Rainsford he won his bed. This also means Rainsford has won the hunt and is finally free and does not have to worry about hunting humans or ever being the prey again. The ending didn't tell you a lot, but told you some main things so you know and can put together with what happened next. All of these quotes explain how Rainsford outsmarted Zaroff and won “The Most Dangerous Game.”…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Kane and Rainsford face death multiple times in their respective story or movie. "Soon as you walk through that door! Come on-I'll hold my fire!" (Foreman 332). Although it is said that the person is holding their fire, if Will Kane walks through that door, the consequence will be death. He is facing death right now whether he likes it or not. He walks through the door, he dies, he stays inside, he still dies. Will Kane is going get shot notwithstanding. Rainsford is facing death for the majority of the story. "It's a game, you see, I suggest to one of them that we go hunting. I give him a supply of food and an excellent hunting knife. I give him three hours' to start. I am to follow, armed only with a pistol of the smallest caliber and…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immediately upon arriving at Zaroff’s chateau, he greets Ivan at the door by saying, “Don’t be alarmed. I’m no robber. I fell off a yacht. My name is Sanger Rainsford of New York City” (4). Since Rainsford is only looking to find help, he communicates with Ivan at the chateau to tell him that he is not from here and needs and would like a shelter to be in for the night. Even though the quotes state that Zaroff is an insane individual, he reassures Rainsford by telling him “Come,” [Rainsford] “We can talk later. Now you want clothes, food, rest. You shall have them. This a most restful spot” (4). Before bombarding Rainsford about his hunting “passion” Zaroff wanted to take good care of his guest while he was with him at his chateau on the island. Thus, Rainsford and Zaroff, two different characters are distinct from each other they share a common similarity…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My character is general zaroff he is insane, mental, and a human hunter. on my first quote to be a nice in the story when he gave Rainsford food, shelter, and clothing. he said '' you will be amused I know''. in that quote, he is mental because he is a human killer. During the story, he is also insane. he shows that by tell Rainsford that he kills people for fun. ''I've read your book about hunting snow leopard in Tibet'', he shows that he is a human hunter during the scene because he reads books about hunting to know more about it so that when he hunts humans it would not be that hard.Lastly,zaroff is also insane in the story.he is insane when he lets the dogs out to kill other people.'' you have won the game '', this part showed that he…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I spotted the light flickering by the doorway in the entry hall, signaling that someone was at the door. Another poor innocent soul, soon to be murdered by General Zaroff. I stepped up to the large wooden door, grabbed my black, long-barreled revolver and turned the brass knob. I looked upon the visitor with great curiosity, as he was naked. The revolver was pointed at his beating heart. His eyes showed a slight glimmer of fear, yet he gave a reassuring smile. His mouth began to move and I could only make out two words. Robber and yacht...…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andersonville Prison

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the war, Wirz was charged for personally murdering 13 of the Union soldiers held captive at the prison camp. It was alleged that Wirz had murdered thirteen Union prisoners of war at Andersonville by shooting, stomping, subjecting such prisoners to the mauling of bloodhounds, and various other mistreatment. However, this is controversial. There were 160 witnesses called to the stand to testify, who all were prisoners. 145 of the witnesses claimed that they had no knowledge that Wirz had murdered anyone at all, and claimed that if he had actually committed these crimes, they most certainly would’ve heard about it. Talking was all that the prisoners could do at the camp, and if these crimes had happened, they would’ve discussed it while in Andersonville. Also, the 13 people who were claimed to be “murdered” were never identified. James Madison Page, an inmate at Andersonville said, “Fictitious men do not need names (Wirz Trial)”. Wirz however, was found guilty on 11 of the 13 charges of murder and for conspiring with high officials. He was sentenced to death and executed on November 10, 1865. Henry Wirz was the only person executed for war crimes during the Civil War.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had convinced Dr. Armstong into helping him fake his death after he had gotten away with everyone being murdered he found it was to obvious that he was the only one alive. He had wrote a confession letter as of to why he had done what he did.Knowing he was wrong to some people but right in his eyes. In his letter he confessed saying “I have wanted . . . to commit a murder myself. I recognized this as the desire of the artist to express himself! . . . But—incongruous as it may seem to some—I was restrained and hampered by my innate sense of justice. The innocent must not suffer.”. He had finally gotten what he had wanted in life and pretty much did get away with murder. Paying the price of taking a life come with losing your own. Once the police came and saw what Wargrave did the were surprised and shocked that someone with such power could lose sight of what is the right thing to do. Guilty of nine individual murders and a suicide of himself he was better off dead than…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Rainsford first meets Zaroff, Zaroff is courteous, hospitable, and honorable; he takes Rainsford in, gives him clothes, dinner, wine, and a place to stay. However throughout the course of the evening and dinner, Zaroff's character takes a drastic and radical darkening. "The weak [men] of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure," (Connell 799) says Zaroff over a glass of wine. "I am strong," (Connell 799) he continues to say. Zaroff hunted captured humans as a hobby and a sport! Rainsford is appalled at this, and Zaroff eventually continues to tell Rainsford of his intention to hunt him: "You'll find this game worth playing...Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" (Connell 801). Zaroff is so corrupt that he doesn't even understand what he is doing is wrong; he appears so nice on the outside, but his words and actions show his…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Things They Carried is a book written by Tim O’ Brien about the destruction of war and the effect on the soldiers. His decision to kill someone was one of the hardest decisions he has ever had to make in his life. To make a decision like this is not as simple as most people think it can be. Many factors play into this, to be able to kill someone is going against morality people face today especially by society. I honestly could not make the decision to kill a man unless my life is at stake. “I’d come to this war a quiet, thoughtful sort of person, a college grad, Phi Beta Kappa and summa cum laude, all the credentials, but after seven months in the bush I realized that those high, civilized trappings had somehow been crushed under the weight…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He explains in his book A Brass Hat in a No Man’s Land(1930) that he felt it was his duty to teach the soldiers the regulations there were and the army act and to teach them that there would be no desertion, cowardliness and no such like offenses. So he believed that the only way to show them that there were serious about this is by doing the Field Punishment or other acts of Capital Punishment. Crozier saw Fear as nothing more than a crime in war. The other point of view we get is from George Coppard. Coppard was completely against Capital and cruel/unusual punishments . George Coppard had a personal experience seeing the Field Punishment happening right in front of his own eyes. He explains the moment using very vivid details, by expressing the situation so vividly and life-like we can see this had a huge impact on him. Coppard says “British Tommy, was undergoing Field Punishment Number One, and this public exposure was part of the punishment”. Coppard not only saw the death and pain that the man went through but he also saw the public exposure as part of…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Classes

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6: Chillingworth's original wish to see justice changed during the course of the novel. At first he wanted to see the shame that the offender should take, but by chapter 13 Chillingworth wants revenge of Dimmesdale, who he has figured to be the offender. He wants revenge on Dimmesdale, he wants him to suffer.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    generals die in bed

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "We light cigarettes against orders and cup our hands around them to hide the glow. We sit thinking. Fry stands motionless with his steel helmet shoved down almost over his eyes. He leans against the parapet motionless. There is a quiet dignity about his posture. I remember what we were told at the base about falling asleep on sentry duty. I nudge his leg. He grunts."…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bamford creates the frame of the US intelligence agencies acting very sloppy in their operations, which enhances their passive mindsets towards innocent civilian lives. Since the United States have wasted millions upon million of dollars on the most advanced weaponry and technology of its time in comparison to the world, should there be fewer casualties to the point that it would be nonexistent? According to Bamford’s “Pretext Of War”, it describes the passive mindset of the United States after the invasion of Iraq was completed, the civilians still have to go by the day with high amounts of fear. “Adding to the civilian’s terror was the…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays