Preview

Difference Between Montresor And General Zaroff

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Montresor And General Zaroff
Garrett Culbert
Oct 22 2014
Block: B7

Montresor vs. Zaroff

There is a lot of simalaritys and difference between the two characters, M0ntresor in the cask of allmontiallo and General Zaroff in the most dangerous game. Montresor had his murder all planned out includeing every small detail. General Zaroff had never even planned on killing Rainsford because rainsford appeared out of nowhere to him and Zaroff wanted to hunt with Rainsford not hunt him. The reason Zaroff wanted to hunt Rainsford was because Rinsford refused to hunt with him.

Montresor is more careful then Zaroff. was helping his victim and also offered to go back up the catacomb but Allmontiado refused. They went down in the tunnel until he ferrered him up and put brick

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When Rainsford first gets to Zaroff’s mansion and Ivan points the gun at Rainsford, when Zaroff hunts Rainsford, and for all the other men that Zaroff had hunted on his island. The significance of conflict is that Rainsford has no other choice, other than being whipped by the brutal force of Ivan, than to be hunted by the sick minded General Zaroff. Whose love for hunting is so extreme he hunts men. Another element I will add to Cornell’s work is key, suspense. Suspense grabs viewer’s attention, and at times makes the audience predictable, tense, and even excited. Suspense will be added to “The Most Dangerous Game” starting when Rainsford goes to Zaroff’s mansion. In the story Rainsford refuses to go into Zaroff’s library, but in the motion picture he will. This scene will be terrifying and full of suspense as Rainsford is lured in and is forced to see all the severed human heads that were once Zaroff’s hunt. This key element will also happen when Rainsford is sent out to hide from Zaroff. Towards the end of the hunt, when Rainsford last trap gets set off and…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford for a second, assuming that a single part of his web of deceit is true, we would find several plot holes. Rainsford also claims that Zaroff killed men because he was bored with killing animals, which could very well be Rainsford’s actual psychological state, but framed on Zaroff. Zaroff promised Rainsford freedom if he survived three nights without being killed, and Rainsford survived, but didn’t give Zaroff a chance to send him to freedom. Justice on murder is based on whether the murder was necessary, but this murder was obviously not necessary due to the end of the 3 night limit. Some may say it was self defense, but there is no real proof that Zaroff hunted men besides Rainsford’s words, which only words are not reasonable proof. In the words of Lois McMaster Bujold, “The dead cannot cry out for justice. It is a duty of the living to do so for them.” The only real proof there is are the fingerprints on the knife that slew Ivan and that Rainsford killed…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately Zaroff can be characterized as Mysterious and cruel. First off one way Zaroff is mysterious is he already knows who Rainsford is without ever meeting each other before. Conelle page 44, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home… I am General Zaroff.” As you can see from this quote Zaroff is excited to meet Rainsford and immediately wants to get to know him better. My second reason is Zaroff acts strange in general around Rainsford. Conelle page 44 “The menacing look in his eyes did not change… a black uniform trimmed with gray astrakhan.” By this quote you can tell Rainsford is feeling uncertain and curious of him. You can also tell by his first reaction he is in some…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you can see in The Cask of Amontillado, “He had a weak point this Fortunato-although in other regards he was a man to be respected and even feared. He prided himself on his connoisseurship in wine.” Through this quote we can see that Montresour already had studied his victim. He knew that he had to be careful with Fortunato’s power, and he had to take advantage of his sky high vanity of knowing a lot of wines. On the other hand, in the Tell Tale Heart the Narrator had trouble defining why exactly he wanted to kill the old man. When he did it, he realized it was only for his eye and once he knew it he couldn’t stop desiring it. As a result, I think Montresour took the time to control his emotions, so when the time of the crime came, he could trick his victim. While the Narrator let his emotions run, which blinded his actions and left loose…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The utter thought of burying someone alive could not be anymore cruel. Inside the vault were many catacombs in which many dead were buried. Montresor carried out his final plan to kill Fortunado in the last moments of the story. He tricked Fortunato to go into a catacomb, where he claimed…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The character of Montresor in, “The Cask of Amontillado” is one who can only be defined with words along the lines of evil, or wicked. He vows to avenge the bold and childish Fortunato, whom Montresor swears did him wrong. Montresor could be described with many bold words, one being guilty. Though he is guilty, he is determined not to get caught. For instance, Montresor declares, “I must not only punish, but punish with impunity” (Poe, 1). Essentially, he is saying he will seek revenge on Fortunato, but he will get away with the vicious crime. Another obvious character trait for the devious Montresor, is dishonest. He claims to have obtained a cask of Amontillado, when the reader can tell through situational irony this is not true. He claims, “...I have received a pipe of what passes for Amontillado, but I have my doubts” (Poe 1). Fortunato unknowingly follows the fiend, and in theory, seals his own fate. Montresor is also quite sneaky. He slyly gets Fortunato into a small inlet in his wine cellar-- also a home for skeletal remains. He hastily chains him up before the poor Fortunato can even realize what’s happening. Explaining the situation, Montresor says, “...finding his progress arrested by the rock, stood stupidly bewildered...a moment more and i fettered him to the granite” (Poe 4). Lastly, Montresor is just plain mysterious. Readers never know exactly why he decided to go after Fortunato, but it is hinted he offended the killer in some way. When asked about his coat of arms, Montresor blatantly states, “A human foot...the foot crushes a serpent rampant whose fangs are imbedded in the heel” (Poe 3). The motto underneath is “nemo me impune lacessit” (Poe 3). To conclude, Montresor plays not only a degrading character, but one of many…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "The Cask of Amontillado", Montresor is the narrator. He begins by describing very cryptically how he was wronged, "The thousands of injuries of Fortunato he has borne as he best could; but when he ventures upon insult, Montresor vows revenge" (Poe 528). As the story unfolds, Montresor's idea of “perfect revenge" is characteristically precise and logical in detail as to how he commits his crime. He knew every step as it would unfold, down to how his mark would react to ‘ego stroking and insult’. This leads me to think he knew his mark very in depth (Possible friends at one time?)…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Montresor's Insanity

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The narrator Montresor is sane because he was able to plan out the murder, and have everything premeditated. When he takes Fortunato to his catacombs he makes sure he keeps drinking by making up excuses, he says,"True--true," I replied; "and, indeed, I had no intention of alarming you unnecessarily--but you should use all proper caution. A draught of this Medoc will defend us from the damps."(Poe 214). This demonstrates Montresor’s…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time man has learned how to rip away the pride of themselves and of others. In Edgar Allen Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado" Montresor tells the reader about the injuries that were set out by Fortunato. The story begins when Montresor and Fortunato were at a party. With their costumes on Montresor lures Fortunato into the catacombs. With all of the cluelessness that Fortunato has, Montresor begins to chain Fortunato to a wall while he moans and groans then buries him alive. Fortunato makes himself an easy target to Montresor by getting drunk.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff and Montresor are alike in many ways. They both killed people, and tortured them. Also they both captured the people they were planning to kill instead of just killing them right then and there so they could torture them, and make them suffer more. After torturing the people, they both killed the people, because they thought they deserved to die, but they really didn’t. But they also had many differences. One of the reasons they were different, is that Zaroff killed people for his own delight, whereas Montresor killed Fortunato because he thought he needed to get revenge on him. Montresor had a reasonable explanation, but Zaroff just wanted to kill people. Also Zaroff lets the people he is going to kill know they are going to die, by telling them before they go out that they are going to be hunted, and if he finds them they will be killed. Montresor makes Fortunato think that he would never hurt him because he acts like they are very close friends, and he pretends that he will never kill anyone, and that he’s a really nice guy. Another difference is that Montresor gives Fortunato a chance to go back by telling him that the niter is hurting him, and he should go back, but Zaroff tells the people he kills they have to go out or they will be killed by Ivan who will kill them in a far more painful and long way.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Montresor Vs Misfit

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe and “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O'Connor. Both of these characters in the short stories share similar characteristics - Montresor and The Misfit. Montresor and The Misfit are considered ruthless and cold blooded murderers. They also think killing is necessary. Even though Montresor and The Misfit live in different era and lifestyle, the authors use vivid characters and compelling storyline to exhibit their motivation and the behavior of pride on how they get away with murder as well as having bizarre moral rectitude that allows them to kill people without remorse.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Fortunato Wrong

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Fortunato has wronged Montresor too many times. Montresor decides to get his revenge and kill Fortunato by using Fortunato’s knowledge of wine. Montresor then sees a drunk Fortunato at a carnival and invites him to his house to see his barrel. When they arrive, they go into the catacombs and Montresor urges Fortunato into a smaller space. He is drunk and confused as Montresor chains him to the area. Montresor then begins to build a wall at the entrance of the small area, and Fortunato sobers up quickly and screams for his life. Suddenly, everything goes silent and in hopes of a response from Fortunato, he throws a torch in the last open area. Montresor's heart grows sick as he builds the rest of the wall.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Montresor does not allow anybody that have insulted him go unpunished. “I must not only punish, but punish with impunity (Poe, 213)”. This shed light on the selfish and the vengeful side of Montresor. He is a very clever man and knows how to use his words correctly, furthermore reversed psychology is also one of Montresors…

    • 981 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both stories introduce their antagonists with favorable descriptions. In the beginning of Wolfe's story, Dick Prosser was idolized by the young boys in the story. Randy Shepperton, one of the boys and the protagonist of this story, says, "It seemed to us boys that there was very little that Dick Prosser could not do."(Par. 6) He could shoot. He taught the boys to box, to play football. He spent time with them and they in turn were fond of him. Likewise in Connell's story, when we first meet General Zaroff, he is described as aristocratic and cultivated. He offers Rainsford food, and shelter, and even his own clothes; even waits to eat so Rainsford can join him for dinner. Rainsford "was finding the general a most thoughtful and affable host, a true cosmopolite."(Par.66). First impressions are not always correct however; as we see as these stories unfold. In Connell's story, General Zaroff, instead of the affable host described in the beginning, is revealed to be a man without value for human life; a hunter of men. Likewise, in Wolfe's story, instead of the helpful, friendly guy pictured on introduction, Dick Prosser is shown to be an indiscriminate murderer as well. Less discriminate in fact than Zaroff—Prosser will kill anyone in his range regardless of…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe, the author uses characterization to help communicate how fatal pridefulness can be by making each character dangerously prideful in completely different ways. In this tale, there is Montresor, a mentally ill but intelligent and hateful man, who feels threatened by Fortunato, a successful, respected, and quite gullible man. Tricky Montresor then leads oblivious Fortunato into the deepest recesses of his family’s catacombs in search of great wine. Fortunato is taken into a trap in which Montresor ties him up in chains and closes him up with brick and mortar. At last, Montresor sets fire to the closed off room in which unknowing Fortunato is left for dead.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics