Preview

hobbes vs aristo

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2862 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
hobbes vs aristo
10/30/13

A Stranger in a Strange World: Aristotle and Hobbes on "Good life and Happiness"
Paylaş

0

Diğer

Sonraki Blog»

Blog Oluştur

Giriş Yapın

A Stranger in a Strange World
Here I publish some of my writings on issues that I deem important. The title of this blog refers to famous statement of Moses in the Bible. I often had similar feelings in my experience with life for a variety of reasons. Until my relations with the world get normalized, I will keep using this title.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Aristotle and Hobbes on "Good life and
Happiness"
Compare and contrast Hobbes with Aristotle with respect to the conceptions they

Followers
Join this site w ith Google Friend Connect

There are no members yet.
Be the first!

have of the good life/happiness. What does this contrast tell us about the more
Already a member? Sign in

general similarities and differences between Hobbes and Aristotle?
The foremost difference between Hobbes and Aristotle that need to be discussed for a

Blog Archive

comparison of Hobbes and Aristotle with regard to their conceptions of good life/happiness is

▼ 2011 (3)

that Aristotle offers normative judgments about the good life, whereas Hobbes rejects normative judgments about the ideal life, and describes human actions without attributing to them a moral quality. Aristotle’s Ethics is replete with such statements that differentiate between virtues/vices, good and evil actions, desirable and undesirable purposes of life, and defines what the best good (summum bonum) is for humans. Hobbes on the other hand rejects all the normative judgments attached to human actions, argues that good and bad varies from one person to another, and he also explicitly rejects the idea that human life has an ultimate purpose (summum bonum). As he states, “For there is no such finis ultimus nor summum bonum as is spoken of in the books of the old moral philosophers…Felicity is a continual progress of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He turns down the notion of psychological egoism. He claim self-interest is always the root of morality…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes, on the contrary, believes that we have a very selfish nature and often do what is in our best interest, regardless of what we are told is right. Their philosophies can help to explain the novel by revealing the reasoning for some of the behaviors that the boys reveal and the actions that they demonstrate.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lastly, both Hobbes and Machiavelli agree in their opinion of man what is one that is very negative. In the novel The Prince, Machiavelli states that men are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, and deceiving, avoiders of danger, eager to gain” (Machiavelli < 1542 > 2006). Similarly, in the novel Leviathan, Hobbes states how the life of a man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes < 1651 > 2009). This shows how both Machiavelli and Hobbes see men and their lives as very negative aspects, but differ in what there perspectives are of it. Machiavelli explains how men are unreliable and not worth trusting when Hobbes is explaining how life naturally is terrible and without sovereignty, life and man are nothing.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke shared similarities within their political theories; however their theories also had some major differences. Both men were responding to the crisis of the 17th century and they were highly influenced by the scientific revolution. Hobbes and Locke rejected all previous theories regarding human nature. They used the same methodology, and the men accepted an atomistic view of society. They believed that individuals were rational and were motivated by self-interest. Hobbes and Locke traced their theories from a state of nature to the social contract. They agreed that the legitimacy of the government rested on the consent of the governed. Together, both men rejected legitimate political authorities such as Divine Right of Kings, brute force, historical tradition, and feudal contracts. Both political philosophers offered interesting arguments pertaining to government, human nature, and the state of nature.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is where he developed his idea that though human life may seem pointless since everyone must meet death at one point in time, it is still sacred; and each person must be responsible for their own actions and consequences.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sadly, I think Hobbes is correct, though clearly he was writing in the abstract. While all people do have within them elements of both good and bad, as The Osmond Brothers said so succinctly in the 1970's, "one bad apple can spoil the whole darn bunch." Even if 99.99% of the population was good, pure, philanthropic, and just, it only takes one "evil" individual to upset everything. As Hobbes pointed out – everyone must make a singular commitment to have freedom from the natural condition.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Happiness isn’t something that can be completely defined. It’s interpreted in distinct ways, some believe it to be a value, while others see it as an emotional state, but everyone sees it as something they want to achieve in life. Hobbes believes that human happiness is nothing more than, “continual success in obtaining the things you want when you want them” (Hobbes 27). Hobbes argues against many philosophers, saying that our happiness is rooted in materialism. Some people may agree with this, thinking if they had more money or certain things than all or most of their problems would be solved and they could finally be happy. For some this could actually be possible, if Hobbes’ philosophy is entirely correct.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Through Aristotle’s work in Politics, he articulates several fundamental aspects of political philosophy that has been greatly influential. Two specific philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Thomas Aquinas, evaluate Aristotle’s perspective of the political nature in relation to mankind. Thomas Aquinas uses Aristotle’s principles as a foundation for his reasoning in writing “On Law, Morality, and Politics.” He modifies Aristotle argument by contributing the religious sphere into the fundamental principles of his political teachings. Thomas Hobbes, on the contrary, is a lot more critical of Aristotle and attacks a lot of his political principles in “The Leviathan.” Hobbes perceives individuals as corrupt, untrustworthy and selfishly motivated, without…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes views the state of…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three rights were life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. He also believe if the government was not functioning in a correct manner, the people have the right to revolt. Thomas Hobbes was the most evil of the thinkers. Hobbes states that people are evil and greedy. It’s human nature for people to be power hungry.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Research Paper

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He believes that people who can’t agree will end up in war which causes destruction in mankind. Considering that Thomas Hobbes was around his mid-50s when the English Civil War happened. Hobbes must have been traumatized by the violence making him believe that people are corrupt and are selfish and horrible. Despite Hobbes thinking, I believe it's wrong for him to judge all of humanity based on a certain event that occurred devastatingly in his life. He should have seen the positivity in people rather than the negativity.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Hobbes claims that without a government to enforce law and order, we would find ourselves in a “war...of every man against every man.” What reasons does he give for believing this? Do you think he is right?…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    history

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes was an ideologist. He was an English philosopher. Hobbes favored dictatorship. Hobbes disagreed with Locke. Hobbes believed Humans are born selfish.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an atheist and a republican who believed everyone was born selfish and that peace and security were fundamental to society. In regards to his philosophy, Hobbes would be against the legalization of prostitution. It teaches children and young adults that it is okay to sell your body and be seen as an object. It also puts people at a higher risk of catching a sexually transmitted disease which doctors will waste thousands of dollars trying to treat, even though there is no cure. Finally, Prostitution is a very dangerous job which could result in in physical abuse, and in extreme cases, death. Al in all, Thomas Hobbes would not support prostitution because it sets a bad example for adolescents and young teens, it is a bad business…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays