Preview

Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
121 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobbes Vs Machiavelli
Lastly, both Hobbes and Machiavelli agree in their opinion of man what is one that is very negative. In the novel The Prince, Machiavelli states that men are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, and deceiving, avoiders of danger, eager to gain” (Machiavelli < 1542 > 2006). Similarly, in the novel Leviathan, Hobbes states how the life of a man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes < 1651 > 2009). This shows how both Machiavelli and Hobbes see men and their lives as very negative aspects, but differ in what there perspectives are of it. Machiavelli explains how men are unreliable and not worth trusting when Hobbes is explaining how life naturally is terrible and without sovereignty, life and man are nothing.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The lack of an impartial judge is a defining characteristic of the state of nature, and this lack of a common judge can lead to confusion and violence therefore leading to the state of war. The state of nature and the state of war are not two separate concepts but the state of nature has the fundamental problem and civil government is the solution for the problems of the state of nature.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes, on the contrary, believes that we have a very selfish nature and often do what is in our best interest, regardless of what we are told is right. Their philosophies can help to explain the novel by revealing the reasoning for some of the behaviors that the boys reveal and the actions that they demonstrate.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The final sentence of that passage, "And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short," seems to sum up what Hobbes has been leading up to in the first twelve chapters of Leviathan: that without a sovereign power, without Leviathan, the natural life of man is simply horrible. It is a life in which people naturally and constantly seek to destroy one another.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was an English philosopher who had a pessimistic view on human nature. He wrote the Leviathan, in which he stated that men lived in constant warfare because of competition for the better…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The Enlightenment thinker that I most agree with is John Locke. I most agree with him because he concurs with Hobbes about the severity of the condition of nature, which obliges a social contract to guarantee peace. Be that as it may, he can't help contradicting 2 things. He contended that regular rights, for example, life, liberty, and property existed in the condition of nature and could never be taken away or even willfully surrendered by people. Locke additionally couldn't help contradicting Hobbes about the social contract. For him, it was an assention among the individuals, as well as in the middle of them and the sovereign. Despite the fact that he stood up for freedom of thought, speech, and religion,…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The seventeenth century in England was a time of many kings. Within a century, the reigns of five kings as well as a military dictator had run rampant over England’s government. Starting with James I, the English monarchy traversed to Charles I, Oliver Cromwell, Charles II, James II, and finally William III. With the ascensions of Cromwell and William III, drastic events changed the course of England’s history, as well as influencing two famous philosophical men. Thomas Hobbes, author of Leviathan, and John Locke, author of Second Treatise on Civil Government, drew on their experiences of England’s monarchical turmoil to conceive very different political theories. Both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were prominent political philosophers in the…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This marked a time of upheaval and unrest that can be seen throughout Hobbes’ works. The country was divided in a civil war, so he used his time studying at Oxford to derive a philosophical solution to this problem. His admiration for the Scientific Revolution influenced his views. Hobbes believed that in order to maintain a peaceful society, an absolute ruler must be the only person with any political power. Political systems derived from religious organizations could and will not work in the real world. Theological arguments should not be brought into politics, however, the absolute leader can determine the “proper forms of religious worship”; his religious duty can never interfere with their political duties, because politics always comes first over religion. The turmoil in Hobbes’ life led to a negative view on human nature. The unbalance of power in his life, from the Civil Wars to Cromwell’s reigns, led him to believe that society must have an absolute leader because people are naturally…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli V.S. Hobbes

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes both have many distinct views yet still manage to also share some common ground with each other. Hobbes believed that all men are created equal which leads to the natural state of man being war, and that to avoid chaos within men they need to be ruled by a strong government. Machiavelli believes that the people should be able to sacrifice anything in order to help a king that is trying to get his kingdom to the top. He believes that a king should primarily study the Art of War and do whatever it takes to make his land the best. Even though they have different views on life they both think that men were all born evil, corrupted, greedy, and are able to cause chaos. When you further analyze both ideas you can easily see how Machiavelli clearly knows what he’s saying. Machiavelli’s idea is much more efficient and accurate than that of Hobbes.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two of the greatest political and philosophical thinkers of their time and ours. Ideas like these have shaped governments throughout history and still hold true today. They had extremely different views on government, but the bases of their arguments were similar. They used reason to justify their ideas, rather than divine right. Although both men acknowledged that there was a God, He played a very small part in their ideologies. The philosophers each had an impact on the world. John Locke’s ideas influenced the United States Declaration of Independence, Federalist papers, and the Constitution. Thomas Hobbes’s ideas refuted England’s parliament. Hobbes and Locke agreed that some type of ruler would be necessary,…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Human nature in Hobbes eyes is a foul, corrupted thing. Like a beast, soiled with foul breath and a mangled appearance. He said human nature was inherently evil, wicked but polished to disguise our foul innards. Locke…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Machiavelli, the first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him. As I read this quote I concluded that Machiavelli was trying to say that if you look at the people that surround a ruler, they can only be people that he thinks is as intelligent as him. On the contrary, Hobbes belief on the nature of men states that men might see other people that have different characteristics then their own, but they need to realize that these kind of people who do not portray the same qualities as themselves do exist.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays