Preview

Machiavelli V.S. Hobbes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
650 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli V.S. Hobbes
Daniel Camacho
Ms. Zimmerman
AP Lang (P.2)
October 9th, 2012
Machiavelli V.S. Hobbes (Revised)
Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes both have many distinct views yet still manage to also share some common ground with each other. Hobbes believed that all men are created equal which leads to the natural state of man being war, and that to avoid chaos within men they need to be ruled by a strong government. Machiavelli believes that the people should be able to sacrifice anything in order to help a king that is trying to get his kingdom to the top. He believes that a king should primarily study the Art of War and do whatever it takes to make his land the best. Even though they have different views on life they both think that men were all born evil, corrupted, greedy, and are able to cause chaos. When you further analyze both ideas you can easily see how Machiavelli clearly knows what he’s saying. Machiavelli’s idea is much more efficient and accurate than that of Hobbes.
When reading Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’ to anyone who is not a king his ideas would sound horrible, but what most people don’t know is that his ideas are everywhere in modern day society and most people agree with those ideas without even knowing that they do. Whether it’s history, presidential debates, or pop culture, Machiavelli’s words have lead to inspire many where as Hobbes hasn’t received as much acknowledgement and acceptance for his views. If you’d ask a group of people if they believe in the saying “It doesn’t matter where you’ve been, only where you going” or “It’s all about what you’re doing, it doesn’t matter what you’ve done” most people would agree with it, without knowing that is exactly what Machiavelli is trying to express in his book ‘The Prince.’
In history, one always ends up reading about a country that tried to make peaceful treaties with the many territories around him and tried not to dive into many wars but always ends up loosing his land. Why? His people were



Citations: * Fry, David K. "Niccolo Machiavelli." Niccolo Machiavelli. CTBW, 9 May 1996. Web. 9 Oct. 2012. <http://www.ctbw.com/lubman.html>. * "Two Different Ideas." Machiavelli/Hobbes. Ed. Mike J. Clingson. BBN, 10 Dec. 2008. Web. 9 Oct. 2012. <http://www.adventure.com/library/encyclopedia/ka/fmachi.html>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu vs. Machiavelli

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jacobus, Lee A. "Niccolò Machiavelli The Qualities of the Prince." A World of Ideas: Essential Readings for College Writers. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2006. 37-52. Print.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli, N. (2010). The qualities of the prince. In L. A. Jacobus (Ed.), A world of ideas: Essential readings for college writers (pp. 39-52). Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin’s…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau Vs Hobbes

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    In favor of Hobbes, he does make several valid points. His theory in regards to constant competition applies to this day, as people constantly find themselves in situations where they meet others that are of equal physical strengths and could be faced with a conflict as a result. Despite the points that Hobbes makes, his theory is overall negative, as living in a constant state of fear and paranoia is absolutely no way to live one’s life. Rousseau is very pertinent to remind others of how life was before society and technology took over. Life was extremely simple, and everyone was fairly alright with living alone and focusing on themselves and their life. If today’s society was the same as it was over a thousand years ago, almost no one would…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lastly, both Hobbes and Machiavelli agree in their opinion of man what is one that is very negative. In the novel The Prince, Machiavelli states that men are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, and deceiving, avoiders of danger, eager to gain” (Machiavelli < 1542 > 2006). Similarly, in the novel Leviathan, Hobbes states how the life of a man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes < 1651 > 2009). This shows how both Machiavelli and Hobbes see men and their lives as very negative aspects, but differ in what there perspectives are of it. Machiavelli explains how men are unreliable and not worth trusting when Hobbes is explaining how life naturally is terrible and without sovereignty, life and man are nothing.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke shared similarities within their political theories; however their theories also had some major differences. Both men were responding to the crisis of the 17th century and they were highly influenced by the scientific revolution. Hobbes and Locke rejected all previous theories regarding human nature. They used the same methodology, and the men accepted an atomistic view of society. They believed that individuals were rational and were motivated by self-interest. Hobbes and Locke traced their theories from a state of nature to the social contract. They agreed that the legitimacy of the government rested on the consent of the governed. Together, both men rejected legitimate political authorities such as Divine Right of Kings, brute force, historical tradition, and feudal contracts. Both political philosophers offered interesting arguments pertaining to government, human nature, and the state of nature.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many intellectual influences also shaped Hobbes’ ideas and philosophies. He collected ideas from classic works, and Calvinist psychology. He derived political philosophy that man want to possess things and human society is not naturally a collection of individuals who live together bound by the rules. He drew aspects from the scientific revolution such as Euclid’s method of deduction, the law of inertia, and many of Galileo’s discoveries. He was focused on arriving at self evident truths. Similarly to Machiavelli, Hobbes’ works are filled with ideas influenced by the violence that he witnessed in his lifetime.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This marked a time of upheaval and unrest that can be seen throughout Hobbes’ works. The country was divided in a civil war, so he used his time studying at Oxford to derive a philosophical solution to this problem. His admiration for the Scientific Revolution influenced his views. Hobbes believed that in order to maintain a peaceful society, an absolute ruler must be the only person with any political power. Political systems derived from religious organizations could and will not work in the real world. Theological arguments should not be brought into politics, however, the absolute leader can determine the “proper forms of religious worship”; his religious duty can never interfere with their political duties, because politics always comes first over religion. The turmoil in Hobbes’ life led to a negative view on human nature. The unbalance of power in his life, from the Civil Wars to Cromwell’s reigns, led him to believe that society must have an absolute leader because people are naturally…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli was dismissed, tortured, jailed and banished from an active role in political life. It was during this time that he wrote The Prince. The Prince is a handbook for…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Thesis

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the book, there are many examples which show who he was influenced by, particularly the Ancient Romans, like Caesar and Alexander the Great, with which I will discuss numerous examples of what they themselves did in the past and which Machiavelli talks about which shows how it influences Machiavelli,…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Parks, T. (2009). Modern translation of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli. London: Penguin Books. 2. Marriott, W.K. (1908). Translation of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli. Retrieved on April 15, 2011 from http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince00.htm 3. Wootton, D. (1995). Translation of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli. Indiannapolis, Indiana, USA: Hackett Publishing Company Inc. 4. Edited by: Bondanella, P. and Musa, M. (1988). The Portable Machiavelli. London: Penguin Books. 5. Edited by: Najemy, J.M.(2010). The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli. Cambidge, England: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 2249 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays