Preview

Explain how an understanding of the main theories on leadership can benefit managers of organisations. Assess the difference between leadership and management processes.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
975 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain how an understanding of the main theories on leadership can benefit managers of organisations. Assess the difference between leadership and management processes.
Explain how an understanding of the main theories on leadership can benefit managers of organisations.

Anybody can learn the finer points of management and how and when to implement them, follow policy and do things by the book, however this does not guarantee a manager's success. To be successful, a manager must have many assets, one of which is leadership.

The success of any group activity usually depends heavily on leadership. It can therefore be advantageous for a manager to possess a broad understanding of the many different theoretic styles of leadership. There are three main types of theory which, although providing some enlightenment, do not fully explain what makes an effective leader. Briefly explained, these are:

· Trait Theories

"Trait" theory relies on certain personality characteristics, which can range from intelligence, and self-assurance to upbringing and education or even personal appearance and health, the list is endless, yet 80 years of study have failed to identify any one trait to distinguish a leader from a non-leader.

· Style Theories

The belief here is that certain styles of leadership work better than others in getting the most out of staff performance. These styles are identified as:

o Dictatorial - basically "bully-boy" tactics are used to force subordinates to work;

o Autocratic - the leader makes all the decisions and expects things to be done his way;

o Democratic - group decision-making is employed and subordinates must be willing to participate;

o Laissez-faire - minimal direction is given to subordinates who are given extensive autonomy.

The degree to which each or any of these styles is effective is largely dependent on the work environment, leader and subordinates. Douglas McGregor believed that, ultimately, a manager will most likely choose his leadership style based on how he views his subordinates. Either way, managers must exercise authority and take responsibility, regardless of how they choose to do so.

·

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Assignment LDR300 Wk1

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leadership and Management are two terms that are often used interchangeably, or else used in very close relation with each other. But leadership is something that is difficult to define, because it is a word that can be defined in a number of different ways. Broadly speaking, however, leadership refers to the ability of an individual to influence a group of subordinate individuals to behave according to a certain manner, and the methods used to motivate those individuals to work together in order to attain a particular goal (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2000, p.4). Leaders, in other words, are innovators, they are men and women of vision, who take risks to inspire and to do the right thing. Management, meanwhile, is more concerned with organization, efficiency, oversight of employees - the more day-to-day activities involved in the running of an organization and in making sure that the organization and its employees are doing things right (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2000, p.8)…

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Often times there is a distinct quality or characteristic of leadership or management, although it would seem at times the two can be virtually intertwined. Successful people cannot be categorized into simply just one role- for effective, and successful leadership both skills are needed. At times the role of a leader can be the task at hand or the role of a manager can be the ability to inspire people. Managers are not limited to management and leaders are not confined to leadership, there are characteristics and qualities of each role. After reviewing articles of leadership qualities and through inner self awareness, the ability to identify three characteristics of leadership, and how to further develop those characteristics while in the program have become clear.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and contrast two theories of leadership. Do these theories offer practical guidance for managers?…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership is a process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more cohesive and coherent (Clark, 1997). Leaders carry out this process by applying their leadership attributes, such as beliefs, values, ethics, character, knowledge, and skills. Bass ' (1989 & 1990) theory of leadership states that there are three basic ways to explain how people become leaders. These theories are; some personality traits may lead people naturally into leadership roles. This is the Trait Theory; a crisis or important event may cause a person to rise to the occasion, which brings out extraordinary leadership qualities in an ordinary person. This is the Great Events Theory; people can choose to become leaders. People can learn leadership skills. The basis of good leadership is honorable character and selfless service to the organization. This is the Transformational Leadership Theory. It is the most widely accepted theory today and the premise on which this assignment is based.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership and Theories

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Interest in leadership increased during the early part of the twentieth century. Early leadership theories focused on what qualities distinguished between leaders and followers, while subsequent theories looked at other variables such as situational factors and skill levels. While many different leadership theories have emerged, most can be classified as one of eight major types:…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Studies of leadership have produced theories involving traits,[2] situational interaction, function, behavior, power, vision and values,[3] charisma, and intelligence, among others.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership Theories

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper evaluates theories of leadership and summarizes the findings from the research. Leadership versus management, leader traits, skills, behavior, and activities can be antiquated differently with the different leadership styles. Leadership power, influence, situations, situational moderator variables, transformational leadership, and the importance of leadership for organizational effectiveness make up a conceptual framework to present and show how the different theories project different ideas on how leaders should lead.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership and Management

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Leadership and management must go hand in hand. They are not the same thing. But they are necessarily linked, and complementary. Any effort to separate the two is likely to cause more problems than it solves.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. HOW CAN WE TRAIN LEADERS OF WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT LEADERSHIP IS ? BY RICHARD A. BARKER (summary of the article) The article defines leadership and gives examples of many different definitions, past and recent ones, and shows that there is no single generalized leadership concept. BARKER clearly separates the three terms, leader, leadership and management by explaining and criticizing the old feudal paradigm 1 and the new one which are the basis of conceptualisation of leadership. BARKER points out that there is a difference between being a leader (which is defined by BURNS as leader traits and behaviours ) and the term “leadership”. According to BURNS, leadership consists of goals that must be related towards an end value and represents a reciprocal process within a context of competition and conflict. Since Burns, the study of leadership has taken many differe nt forms which had a narrower focus on the term, however today there is very little known about leadership. There are very few recent definitions of leadership, although those that exist focus on the leader’s knowledge, traits, skills and abilities and the process of influencing. Contrary to many other authors, BARKER does not make the assumption that people know what leadership is. The responses from various studies which were done with…

    • 2623 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Papr

    • 2845 Words
    • 12 Pages

    When developing your leadership skills, one must soon confront an important practical question, "What leadership styles work best for me and my organization?" To answer this question, it 's best to understand that there are many from which to choose and as part of your leadership development effort, you should consider developing as many leadership styles as possible.…

    • 2845 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Behaviour

    • 4549 Words
    • 19 Pages

    3.1 discuss the impact that different leadership styles may have on motivation organisations in periods of change…

    • 4549 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leader vs Manager

    • 5112 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Organizations need both strong leaders and strong management for optimal effectiveness. There is a continuing controversy about the difference between leadership and management. A Manager is the person responsible for planning and directing the work of a group of individuals, monitoring their work, and taking corrective action when necessary. (F. John Reh) Not all mangers exercise leadership. Often it is assumed that anyone in a management position is a leader. “Definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal”. (Susan Ward). Leadership is performed by people who are not in management positions (e.g. informal leader). Some scholars argue that “although management and leadership overlap the two activities are not synonymous” (Bass, 2010). The degree of overlap is a point of disagreement (Yukl, 2010). Bennis states…

    • 5112 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nature of Leadership

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Trait Theory grew from the observations and beliefs that leaders have personal qualities or characteristics that make them "good" leaders. These characteristics may include physical, personality and competency. Much of this literature was published between 1930 and 1950. The emphasis in this model…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management and leadership can often be confused as being the same thing; when in fact, they are not. A manager can often be a good leader, yet a leader doesn’t necessarily have to be a manager. It almost sounds like a riddle, but a leader and a manager can sometimes be the same person; however, they are also two different things. In order for an organization to maintain a healthy organizational culture, there are many things that a leader must take into consideration and demonstrate on a day-to-day basis. With further explanation, it should be clearer and more easily understood.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership Style

    • 4413 Words
    • 18 Pages

    In the words of Edwin Flippo, ““Leadership style is a pattern of behaviour designed to integrate organisational and personal interest in pursuit of some objective.”…

    • 4413 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays