Essay On Jury System
The Jury System
The Jury System is a worldwide legal system aimed to determine the genuine facts of an issue in a lawsuit, however many individuals strongly oppose the efficiency and accurateness of the jury system, adopted by the English during the middle ages. The jury system exists to bring law to common sense and the through the judgement of the community, as well as considering the values and standards of the state. Nevertheless, there are current debates on whether the jury system should be held accountable for determining the verdict of one’s charge is questionable, as many factors follow the opposing factors. Jury selection is obtained through selecting and informing random individuals from the same community, provided if the individual is absent of criminal offences, and within the appropriate age group. There is a fine line between a summary offence and an indictable offence, …show more content…
Twelve ordinary members from the community are selected by a ballot conducted in open court sit in judgement of the evidence presented in trial. The requirements of being a juror are scarce, in fact only those who have a vast understanding of the English language, have been involved in a major criminal offence or have a disability in this area e.g. physically or mentally unfit, are not permitted to undertake the position. However, the knowledge required for becoming a juror is only one’s life experiences, as the system is dependent on this knowledge. The set task for the juror is to judge the facts presented in the evidence as many elude their own opinions on the issue, as a result the judicial officer presiding over the trial will direct this jury as to the law and will impose any penalty upon the persons convicted. As referenced from the Sydney Criminal Lawyers, the many people believe that they will get a fairer trial if they appear in front of a jury, whilst many
The Jury System is a worldwide legal system aimed to determine the genuine facts of an issue in a lawsuit, however many individuals strongly oppose the efficiency and accurateness of the jury system, adopted by the English during the middle ages. The jury system exists to bring law to common sense and the through the judgement of the community, as well as considering the values and standards of the state. Nevertheless, there are current debates on whether the jury system should be held accountable for determining the verdict of one’s charge is questionable, as many factors follow the opposing factors. Jury selection is obtained through selecting and informing random individuals from the same community, provided if the individual is absent of criminal offences, and within the appropriate age group. There is a fine line between a summary offence and an indictable offence, …show more content…
Twelve ordinary members from the community are selected by a ballot conducted in open court sit in judgement of the evidence presented in trial. The requirements of being a juror are scarce, in fact only those who have a vast understanding of the English language, have been involved in a major criminal offence or have a disability in this area e.g. physically or mentally unfit, are not permitted to undertake the position. However, the knowledge required for becoming a juror is only one’s life experiences, as the system is dependent on this knowledge. The set task for the juror is to judge the facts presented in the evidence as many elude their own opinions on the issue, as a result the judicial officer presiding over the trial will direct this jury as to the law and will impose any penalty upon the persons convicted. As referenced from the Sydney Criminal Lawyers, the many people believe that they will get a fairer trial if they appear in front of a jury, whilst many