Preview

Jury Trial Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1140 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jury Trial Research Paper
Bench trial vs. Jury trial
High profile cases being spread through the media attracting massive attention. Cases such as the Sean Bell shooting, Amadou Diallo, and these trials were spread all throughout television which sometimes doesn’t fall in the favor of the defendant. There are two types of trials a bench trial also known as a court trail and a jury trial. NYS procedural law 260.10, states that every criminal depending on the crime must be trialed with 12 randomly selected jurors. The bench trial is another term for a judge trial without the jurors. The bench trial is conducted in this fashion; both parties present their evidence or make their opening statement. After the plaintiff finishes presenting his evidence, the defendant presents …show more content…
Mr. Simpson was on trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. Simpson had a team of defense attorneys on his side, most famous being Johnny Cochran. He came forth with the famous line “if the gloves don’t fit, you must acquit”. The jurors found the verdict to be not guilty on all charges. This impacted the case in a huge way. People say that O J walked due to the fact that it was a jury trial, he was a famous football star and actor with many fans. Due to the fact that he was a celebrity, he probably had fans within the jurors which were a huge advantage for him. Even though he was found not guilty on all charges doesn’t make him innocent. A jury trial has many pros and cons. The advantage of having a trial by jury allows a sort of "second trial." For example, in the movie Twelve Angry Men, every single jury member voted guilty, except for one. The other eleven men demanded his reasons for voting Not Guilty, and he gave them. In the end, they voted Not Guilty unanimously. Now, the defendant in question was charged with murder, to which the penalty was death by electrocution. However, the evidence, which most of the jury members did not question, was not as sound as they thought, and the man that voted Not guilty showed them that. If the defendant hadn't had a jury, then he would have been sentenced to death, whether he was guilty or not, due to the meager and circumstantial evidence
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Case Research Paper
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Oj Simpson Case Research Paper

    The O.J. Simpson murder case was a criminal trial held in Los Angeles, California from January 29 to October 3, 1995. The former football player and actor, O.J. Simpson was tried for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The case has been described as the most publicized and controversy criminal case in American history. The case was racially divided because most African Americans believed that Simpson was innocent and most Caucasian Americans believed he was guilty. The prosecutor had indisputable forensic evidence but the defense attorneys were able…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Nicole Brown Simpson Case Study
    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Nicole Brown Simpson Case Study

    However the jury did find him not guilty meaning the defense lawyers had to have instilled enough doubt into their minds to make them unable to say without a reasonable doubt. As I mentioned one of the biggest moments of the trial is Simpson trying on the glove and it not fitting. This was huge for instilling doubt in the jurors’ minds. A big theme throughout this case was racism. This is mentioned in an article titled 20 years after the killings: How O.J. Simpson got off, according to local legal pros. He interviewed a veteran lawyer named Bob Beyer who believed the case basically turned into a racial case. The jury had nine African Americans on it and if they were on Simpson’s side, the glove not fitting would be a perfect point for them. The Rodney King case three years earlier is mentioned and how the LAPD was a racist police department. This is a big point because the defense claimed that Detective Mark Fuhrman planted the glove to frame Simpson and if the jury thinks that the police could be racist they are going to believe this. Another big piece of evidence pointing towards Simpson was the sock with Nicole’s blood on it found at his house. However, the defense argued that this too was planted. Stating that the blood was smeared on the socks in the lab. This is a big deal because blood had soaked through to the other side. This would not be possible if there was a foot in it. Later on Fuhrman was charged for perjury because of his testimony on how he collected evidence. This would really hurt the prosecution because now it shows they had a bad witness and could make them think other evidence was tampered with. Simpson was also a huge star and loved by the people of LA and this could have also had a big impact on their decision. The trial probably should not have been done in LA due to a possible bias of Simpson’s fame there. Another big thing is that the prosecutors…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury Nullification Paper
    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page

    Jury Nullification Paper

    · Conclude by choosing a position for or against ethnicity-based jury nullification and defend your decision.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification Research Paper
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jury Nullification Research Paper

    In our society, ethnicity does have major effects on our judicial practices and courtroom proceedings do to The Sentencing Project research. It has also affected several different places where we live. For example, Poverty stricken areas has more of a possibility to experience much more crime than a place that is more fruitful employment and has maintained wealth. The issues with both class and race are more likely to impact on the likelihood of involvement with the treatment within the system and the criminal justice system. As long as society keeps racial tension in existence within the court system it will always exist.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification Research Paper
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification Research Paper

    Jury Nullification CJA 344 October 6, 2014 Johnny Cotton Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification Research Paper
    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification Research Paper

    Jury nullification is a right enjoyed, but not understood, by all jurors in the US. This right gives jurors the ability to interpret laws for themselves and return not-guilty verdicts for guilty defendants allowing them to nullify laws. (Emal, 1995) The most common admonishment by judges is that jurors must decide the case based on facts, and that they are not in fact interpreting the fairness…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On State Trial Court
    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On State Trial Court

    The state trial courts are where cases start, and they require witnesses and evidence presented in the case. However, the state Supreme Courts and state Court of Appeal need no evidence or witnesses to determine a case. The state trial court has one judge in the courtroom while the state Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court has a group of judges to determine a cause (Tarr, 2013). There is a jury in state trial courts while there is no jury in both the state court of appeal and state Supreme…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juries Selection, Advantages, Disadvatages in Britain
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juries Selection, Advantages, Disadvatages in Britain

    There are many arguments for and against the use of juries. One key advantage is it provides public participation, creating an open criminal justice system. This is important because the system is there for the good of society, and society can play an active part in it's operation. This also serves to create public faith in the…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jury in court
    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jury in court

    Juries are used in both Criminal and Civil cases although the use of juries is very small. Juries are used in the Crown Court for criminal trials of indictment, High Court - Queen’s Bench Division, County Court and in some cases the Coroners’ Courts. Less than 1% of criminal cases are decided on by a jury this is because 97% of cases are dealt by the Magistrates’ Court and from the cases that go to the Crown Court, about two out of three defendants plead guilty.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jury Selection
    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Selection

    The selection of a jury is the process that occurs right before the actual trial, and after the trial initiation and the arraignment and plea. Only about 10 percent of actual arraignments see an actual trial, because 90 percent of cases that are preparing for trial end up accepting a plea bargain (Schmalleher, 2009).…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The US Judicial System
    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The US Judicial System

    A jury trial is a trial with 12 people from different background that get to choose if you are guilty or not. The vote has to be unanimous. A bench trial is a trial where the judge is deciding whether you are guilty or not. You get to choose but they both have their ups and downs. The defendant might choose a bench trial because their case might be complicated and confuse a jury. The defendant might choose a jury trial because the verdict is harder to agree upon. When it come to both of the ways to have a trial, none of them is 100% sure if their verdict is…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Equality In The Court System
    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Equality In The Court System

    That may be but what about when there is a celebrity on the trial. That why I’m writing this paper, when a celebrity is on the stand they are less likely to be convicted of crime; but on the other hand compared the average person, the average person would be convinced. A celebrity could commit the same crime as a normal person and receive less harsh punishment or none at all; while the normal person takes their punishment and does the time. So this will be about…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Juries
    • 3519 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Juries

    Juries have been used in the legal system for over 1000 years. Originally they were used for providing local knowledge and information and acted more as witnesses than decision – makers. By the middle of the 15th Century, juries had become independent assessors and assumed their modern role as deciders of fact.…

    • 3519 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Disadvantages Of The Jury System
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Disadvantages Of The Jury System

    The jury system gives us many advantages in the role it plays in the court room, one of the many advantages is that it allows the jury to have a cross section of many different types of 12 people giving us an answer that is agreed amongst everyone. The way the jury system works is that as the jurors are summoned through the electoral roll, then will receive a questionnaire through the mail which will allow the final 12 jurors to be selected. Through this method, it allows a variety of different types of people to be chosen. It gives us an honest verdict of the accused being guilty or non-guilty as it allows us to see what the minds of different type of people think.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury System in Hong Kong
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jury System in Hong Kong

    Trial by jury is a legal proceeding in which the guilt or innocence of the defendant is determined by a jury. It is opposed to bench trial that all final judgments are made by a judge. In Hong Kong, as it is under the common law system, jury trials are used in serious criminal cases and also some civil cases, like murder, manslaughter, rape, civil fraud and defamation cases etc. In addition, the jury is formed by a group of eligible citizens which is selected by local population. The criteria for service as a jurors are 1) she/he is a resident of Hong Kong, 2) is between 21-65 years old, 3) is of good character and sound mind and 4) has a sufficient knowledge of both the language of English and Chinese. All these qualifications listed are ensure the juries have their ability to make the most appropriate verdict maturely and reasonably. To further assure the fairness, a jury usually comprises seven people and the verdict has to be reached by a majority of not less than five jurors (Jury Ordinance s.24). Apart from Hong Kong, jury trail is also used in many countries, like United Kingdom, United States, Russia, Canada and France etc. It means the maintenance of jury trial has its saving grace even in Hong Kong. However, there are still some criticisms to challenge the reliability and usefulness of the jury trial system. Therefore, I will try to evaluate the strengths and weakness of maintenance of jury trial in Hong Kong in the following passage.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics