Critiquing Objective Values

If we cannot provide grounds or justification for the identification of objective value, then we cannot also provide any coherent argument or justification or defense for the idea of the dignity of the person. Since in order to the idea of human dignity be accepted, we must first justify or provide grounds that there is a universal values and conduct across and within people, cultures, nations, and races. Considering this, the education for the value of life becomes important. Because if people are relative and subjective to what they uphold as good or bad and views they the value or worth of the human person differently then we cannot find objective agreement or justification for the dignity of every human person. That is why, the value of life must inculcate to people, to the next generation and the next.
In Lewis writing, this is equivalent to “…not to cut down jungles but to irrigate dessert.” “The right defense against false sentiments is to inculcate just sentiments.” The importance of culture must be valued as we must value the dignity of every human person regarding of his race, religion, belief, ethnicity, culture, political views, and nationality.
Additionally, in the writing of C.S. Lewis, he identifies some intercultural, intercontinental and intergenerational values and views of people; from (St.) Augustine to Aristotle and Plato, to Confucius, from the Greeks, Hindu, Chinese, to medieval civilizations. This can be a justification of universal values in which also may be the foundation of ethics. Although that culture have differ in their dresses, preferences, dances, music, and appearances, we cannot denied that across this cultures there essential