Preview

Compare And Contrast Union And Confederate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Union And Confederate
At the beginning of the Civil War the Union and Confederacy both had their own advantages and disadvantages. Neither the Union nor the Confederacy were prepared for war, however the North had a few advantages the South did not. The Union had more soldiers, more factories, and better railroads than the Confederacy. On the other hand, they were defending their homeland, the Confederacy had better morale and drive (Stewart). The higher levels of morale in the South, however, did not make up for their disadvantages in the beginning of the war. The South had very limited gunpowder factories and had to rely on imported weapons and ammunition, this led to their soldiers being poorly equipped. They also had no tax structure and no naval reinforcements.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first the South relied on imported arms and munitions but soon was able to produce its own. It had more trouble with clothing and food throughout the duration of the war.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Secession and Ft. Sumter involved the South, North, South Carolina, and Fort Sumter and it affected the North, South, the Union, and South Carolina. The South seceded from the Union after the Election of 1860. They felt that they had no representation in the government once Lincoln became the President. The Southern territories consolidated and formed the “Confederate States of America” . To wholly transform the states in the Confederacy, the South captured Fort Sumter which was being controlled by Robert Anderson, a former slave owner. This was the first act of aggression in the Civil War. The North did not want to begin a Civil War with the South. Once, the North learned about the South’s bombardment of Fort Sumter, they were ambitious…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert E Lee Thesis

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They had nearly all of the advantages. One thing they had was a greater population that could fight and also free black men, while the south debated over whether they should be able to fight until the war was over. The North also had an established government that was over a hundred years old while the South started with one only a few weeks old. One major factor that the North had was the boom of the Industrial Revolution and lots more money. The only big advantage the south had was Robert E.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States (U.S.) Constitution is the source of all government powers and provides limitations on the government that protect the natural rights of U.S. citizens. Prior to its creation, the 13 original states comprising the U.S., were united under the Articles of Confederation. These articles entrusted a Confederate Congress with the authority to wage war, mediate disputes between states as well as set weights and measures. However, the Confederate Congress was completely funded by individual states, did not have the authority to raise funds itself and all decisions required a unanimous vote of approval from all states. It was far from a perfect government. These limitations along with the historical tendencies high ranking officials have toward greed and abuse of power rendered this Congress ineffective, spawning a collective desire for reform. (Whitehouse.gov, 2017) In 1787 delegates from 12 of the 13 states convened in Philadelphia to draft a new Constitution. Their goals were to design a government that could provide fair treatment to its citizens, keep peace amongst the individual states as well as with outside nations, defend our country from enemies, and to set a standard for living comfortably, well, and free. To achieve this, the government was split into three separate branches and power divided amongst them.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Union and Confederate armies fought against each other in the Civil War. This essay is about comparing and contrasting the Union Army and the Confederate Army. The better well supplied Union Army had more factories and soldiers against the Confederate Army who wasn’t as well supplied.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their strategy was to survive, own nation, provide Europe with cotton, and get United Kingdom to side. They followed the three ruled which were to wear them down, keep moral high and keep their army together as one. Their advantages were that they knew the land, had better generals, and they were more enthusiastic about the fight. But the disadvantage was that they lacked industrial goods and products, but most importantly they lacked people. The north had about 620,924 people while the south had 154,910 people.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the North having more production and population, the South could have won the Civil War with a few adjustments. Notice how the South’s largest production is cotton, compared to the North. The North had a balance of different types of production, which enabled the soldiers to be easily equipped with materials and accumulate wealth. One of the major reasons why the South lost was that it spent more on cotton production instead of increasing the other types of production. If it spent more on the different types, it could have won. The South depended heavily on agricultural type of labor, through the use of slaves. The slave owners did not free the slaves, since they were needed to cultivate the cotton to raise profit for the owners. Moreover,…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the South was good for farming, and agriculture the North has warm, and humid summers, and snowy winters. The North's land is difficult for farming they had a short growing season. The North was rocky and hilly, so the Noth was great for factories, and used waterpower to run…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    derived from, and in defense of one minority group. As the Colonists built their own societies and settlements in the New America, issues of contentions arose separating themselves from the rest of the British empire. The Revolution became a fight for themselves and their well being not the well being of anyone else. As ideas of Civil War arose around 1860-1861 the cause was for the black minority although not yet announced by Abraham Lincoln. Both the American Revolution and Civil War were powered through the desires of one minority group to rise up and fight against the traditional normalities.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Something Random

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Union advant. : larger population, advanced indust. System and to manufacture most materials during war better transportation…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Union is often regarded as the stronger side in the American Civil War, with its larger population of 22 million in 1860 compared to the Confederacy’s 9 million, its strength in manufacturing of firearms, pig iron, railroad cars, its quantity of railroad lines, and its financial resources. (521)…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Advantages

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The civil war is one of the turning points in the history of the United States. After the fall of fort Sumter, the battle lines were drawn very quickly. The first shots had been fired and there was no turning back. The union being an established country already, acknowledged by outside countries as a nation. This was one of the most important advantages of the Union. The north where most of the union states resided was known for its booming industry. This means they readily had supplies in which to defend their territory with such as guns, uniforms and other necessities. Being an established country also means the chain of command is clearer and they are better apt to strategize for the upcoming battles. While the Union had many advantages…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays