Compare And Contrast Umayyad And Qin
Compare the Qin and Song politically and socially.
The Qin and Song were similar and different politically and socially. Similarly, they both had Patriarchal families and both made women lower in status. However, the Qin had legalism bureaucracy whereas the Song had Confucian bureaucracy.
2. Compare the Umayyad and Abbasid politically and socially.
The Umayyad and Abbasid were similar and different politically and socially. Both valued merchants highly, and were both bureaucratic. However, the Abbasids believed the the Caliph should be a blood line, while the Umayyads believed it should be by the best ruler.
3. What are changes and continuities in Indian ocean trade between 600-1750?
In 600-1750, there were many changes and continuities …show more content…
Similarly, their military expansion lead to commercial success and had divisions of clans. However, Mali had more power in the territories they took over than Ghana.
6. Compare the Byzantine empire and Medieval Western Europe politically and socially.
The Byzantine and Medieval Western Europe were similar and different politically and socially. Similarly, they were both considered “Roman,” and both were organized by a hierarchy. However, the Byzantine obeyed by Justinian’s law code, and Medieval Western Europe obeyed the 12 tables.
7. Compare Greece and Rome politically and religiously.
Greece and Rome were similar and different politically and religiously. Similarly, they were both centralized, and both were monotheistic. However, Greece was broken up into city-states and Rome was split into two--the East and West.
8. Compare the Tang and Song socially and politically.
The Tang and Song dynasties were similar and different socially and politically. Similarly, they were both bureaucratic and had Confucian scholar-gentry. However, the Song had social requirements such as footbinding in women’s fashion which lead them to have a lower statues in the Song than in the
The Qin and Song were similar and different politically and socially. Similarly, they both had Patriarchal families and both made women lower in status. However, the Qin had legalism bureaucracy whereas the Song had Confucian bureaucracy.
2. Compare the Umayyad and Abbasid politically and socially.
The Umayyad and Abbasid were similar and different politically and socially. Both valued merchants highly, and were both bureaucratic. However, the Abbasids believed the the Caliph should be a blood line, while the Umayyads believed it should be by the best ruler.
3. What are changes and continuities in Indian ocean trade between 600-1750?
In 600-1750, there were many changes and continuities …show more content…
Similarly, their military expansion lead to commercial success and had divisions of clans. However, Mali had more power in the territories they took over than Ghana.
6. Compare the Byzantine empire and Medieval Western Europe politically and socially.
The Byzantine and Medieval Western Europe were similar and different politically and socially. Similarly, they were both considered “Roman,” and both were organized by a hierarchy. However, the Byzantine obeyed by Justinian’s law code, and Medieval Western Europe obeyed the 12 tables.
7. Compare Greece and Rome politically and religiously.
Greece and Rome were similar and different politically and religiously. Similarly, they were both centralized, and both were monotheistic. However, Greece was broken up into city-states and Rome was split into two--the East and West.
8. Compare the Tang and Song socially and politically.
The Tang and Song dynasties were similar and different socially and politically. Similarly, they were both bureaucratic and had Confucian scholar-gentry. However, the Song had social requirements such as footbinding in women’s fashion which lead them to have a lower statues in the Song than in the