Preview

Commerce Clause: Federal Government Influence In The US

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
241 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Commerce Clause: Federal Government Influence In The US
The Commerce Clause is where Congress’s broadest powers are derived (Melvin, 2015). Courts are highly regardful to congressional action in fields that impact interstate commerce. The constitutional power is to regulate (1) official routes of interstate commerce like railways and highways, (2).vehicles utilized as a part of delivery, and (3) the items moving in interstate business are in the hands of Congress. Notwithstanding for business activity that is absolutely intrastate. Congress has the ability to control the action inasmuch as it has a generous financial impact on interstate trade. For instance, an administrative demonstration was passed in the territory of Illinois requesting that business trucks driving must be outfitted with a specific sort of mudguards previously getting through the state. …show more content…
This is illicit in a few states was costing the truckers additional cash and time. In the historic point instance of Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, 359 U.S. 520 (1959), Even, however, the law connected to trucks just in Illinois the U.S. Incomparable Court found that the extra weights of lost time and expenses of establishing considerably influenced interstate trade. This significant impact exceeded the insignificant extra wellbeing gave by the mud guard's utilization. The two-fold point of this article is the immediate source of the Federal Government control in peacetime and the Fourteenth Amendment is the most important limitation forced by the Constitution, which comprises of due process and equal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    It is about whether the statute is constitutionally valid under the Dormant Commercial Clause (DCC). The State argues that all trucks must be equipped with certain types of protective devices to promote safety on the roads. The cost of the safety devices is approximately $1195 per truck. The Plaintiff, BBT, alone owns 89 trucks in its fleet. The regulation like this would impose a significant financial burden on the company like BBT as well as would put a hindrance on the trucking industry…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    States don’t have the authority to substantially inhibit the flow of commerce and where the need for national uniformity in laws.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/421 Final

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3) The state of Kansas has enacted a new law requiring all commercial trucks driving on Kansas roads to have special mud flaps installed. These mud flaps have been proven to make driving in the rain significantly safer due to reduced mist created by trucks driving in the rain, although data regarding accidents and injuries has not yet been determined. Any truck entering Kansas must have these flaps installed or will be subject to a significant fine and delay. The cost for purchase and installation of these flaps is $1,000 per truck. In short, trucks must have these flaps or go around the state. This Kansas law…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Applicable Law(s) or Legal Principle(s) The Commerce Clause is found in Article. I, Section. 8 of the U. S. Constitution and states that “Congress has the power “to regulate Commerce among the several States.” Trucks carrying goods is “commerce” and trucks that travel between states are in “interstate commerce.” Section 8 also states that Congress has the power “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing Powers”. In court decisions, the U. S. Supreme Court has interpreted the Commerce Clause to include any activity that “substantially affects” interstate commerce.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that the word commerce comprehended navigation, and that it had the power to regulate navigation. Secondly, the Supreme Court held that navigation involved the control of navigable waters, and included the power to keep them open and free from obstruction, and to make improvements. Thirdly, the Supreme Court concluded that under the commerce clause Congress had the power to authorize improvements in waters within the limits of a state…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cilvil Rights Movment Dbq

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Boynton v. Virginia The supreme court said the interstate passengers were protected by the Interstate Commerce Act…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP US DBQ

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Congress doesn’t have the power to ban commercial trade between the United States and any foreign country without two thirds of the vote in both houses.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question three. The Commerce Clause is one of the enumerated powers in the Constitution. It is granted to the Congress in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. Today, the scope of the commerce power is left largely to Congress, “often pitting the power of Congress to advance its national agenda against judicial constraints that favor business or state interests (text, p. 324).” The Constitution states that, among other enumerated duties, Congress had the power to “regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes (text, p. 325).” Prior to the Commerce Clause, the Continental Congress held no power to raise revenue or to regulate commerce among the states. Its power to conclude treaties with foreign countries meant little to nothing, unless it could control commerce coming into state ports (text, p. 324). Furthermore, the intense issues between the states and various business transactions led to the necessity for a stronger federal government in order to effectively control internal disputes.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, the State of New York “…gave individuals the exclusive right to operate steamboats on waters within state jurisdiction. Laws like this one were duplicated elsewhere which led to friction as some states would require foreign (out-of-state) boats to pay substantial fees for navigation privileges,” as retrieved from www.oyez.com. In this case, the New York law violated federal law by giving in-state operators the monopoly on the coasting trade.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises; all duties, imposts and excises must be uniform throughout the United States. To borrow money. To coin money, set it’s value, and punish counterfeiting. To raise and support an army and navy and make rules for their governance. To declare war. To establish a post office. To establish rules for becoming a citizen and bankruptcy. To issue patents and copyrights to inventors and authors. To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court. To define and punish piracies, felonies on the high seas, and crimes against the law of nations. To exercise exclusive legislative powers over the seat of government and over places purchased as federal facilities.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial branch of government interprets laws and administers justice. The judicial branch of government was established by Article lll of the Constitution along with other Federal courts created by Congress. This branch came about when statesmen who met in Philadelphia were followers of Montesquieu's concept that powers in politics should be balanced. John Locke's writings supported and made this principle stronger, this led to the judgment that there needed to be three equal branches of government, the executive, legislative, and the judicial branch.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American government instituted a protective tariff which raised the cost of imports, which made more citizens buy from local merchants. Alexander Hamilton also chartered the Bank of the United States, which led to branch offices in eight major cities. However, James Madison destroyed the BUS which made the government’s support change to state, rather than national. Transportation improvements became a major focus in the nation's new political economy. Roads, bridges, and Canals were built, including the most famous the Erie Canal, to help aid in the transportation of goods across the U.S.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on a number of important principles the U.S Constitution aimed for prevention of the abuse of power. The people did want the government have too much power. Americans were afraid of their rights not being protected. These principles were according to which state or organization is governed. These principles are written down in different documents which go in the constitution.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commerce primarily means to traffic or transport goods across state lines for revenue (2). The Constitution of the United States itemizes specific powers for the federal government as conveyed in the Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8 and Clause 3) of the United States Constitution (1). The Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes (5). On the contrary, the Tenth Amendment confers that any powers that are not delegated to Congress by the Constitution are reserved for the states (1). The construction of the Commerce Clause was initially displayed to restrict state power rather than to make it a source of national power (2). As a result, Congress…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With Britain’s growing debt from the war that was accumulated from protecting and fighting for the American colonies, Parliament was put in a difficult place. If the Parliament had tried to gain this taxing consent, I feel that the colonists would have been less resistant with Parliament. During this time many American colonist like Patrick Henry, who was part of the House of Burgress did try to find a resolution, which ending up only upsetting the British government. The First Continental Congress only really wanted to limit the power of Parliament, determine their rights as American colonials and ways to resist the Coercive Act. The Coercive Act, basically gave the British the authority over the colonies causing even more issues and resistances against the British government. In 1774 the American colonies where not ready for independence, they truly just wanted a say for themselves.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays