Preview

Commerce Clause: One Of The Enumerated Powers In The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
504 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Commerce Clause: One Of The Enumerated Powers In The Constitution
Question three. The Commerce Clause is one of the enumerated powers in the Constitution. It is granted to the Congress in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. Today, the scope of the commerce power is left largely to Congress, “often pitting the power of Congress to advance its national agenda against judicial constraints that favor business or state interests (text, p. 324).” The Constitution states that, among other enumerated duties, Congress had the power to “regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes (text, p. 325).” Prior to the Commerce Clause, the Continental Congress held no power to raise revenue or to regulate commerce among the states. Its power to conclude treaties with foreign countries meant little to nothing, unless it could control commerce coming into state ports (text, p. 324). Furthermore, the intense issues between the states and various business transactions led to the necessity for a stronger federal government in order to effectively control internal disputes.
The scope of the Commerce Clause reached the Supreme Court in Gibbons v. Ogden, as various discrepancies involving a power struggle between the federal and state governments emerged. In 1824, a New York state law permitted individuals the exclusive right to operate steamboats
…show more content…
Board of Wardens followed the framework of Gibbons v. Ogden, where the majority opinion determined that a Pennsylvania law requiring all ships entering or exiting the port of Philadelphia to employ a local pilot did not violate the Commerce Clause. Although the inclusion of navigation in the Commerce Clause has now been clearly defined, the “mere grant to Congress of the power to regulate commerce, did not deprive the States of power to regulate pilots…but to leave its regulation [of pilots] to the several States…(text, p. 331).” It was within this particular case that the Supreme Court granted power to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Applicable Law(s) or Legal Principle(s) The Commerce Clause is found in Article. I, Section. 8 of the U. S. Constitution and states that “Congress has the power “to regulate Commerce among the several States.” Trucks carrying goods is “commerce” and trucks that travel between states are in “interstate commerce.” Section 8 also states that Congress has the power “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing Powers”. In court decisions, the U. S. Supreme Court has interpreted the Commerce Clause to include any activity that “substantially affects” interstate commerce.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MGT 320 Mastery Exercises

    • 2152 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. The _____ restricts the states’ abilities to regulate commerce, rather than the federal governments.…

    • 2152 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In foreign relations, the government set down by the Articles of Confederation had minimal, if any, control and authority over diplomatic efforts with Spain, France, Britain, and the foreign presences in America. One contributing factor to this was the lack of an executive branch. Congress was the chief coordinating agency of any war efforts and almost every action of meaning. During a disagreement over foreign policy, the argument could possibly have lasted for weeks with no decision or compromise set, leaving the problem standing unresolved. What authority Congress did have over commerce was shown in some unfair tariffs on foreign trade, that consequentially affected foreign relations. There was a marked decline in the estimated market of United States exports to Great Britain; in those, there was a definite per capita drop [Document B]. There was much difficulty with diplomatic efforts with other countries. For example, while negotiating a treaty with Spain that…

    • 927 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Competitors were unhappy and challenged this decision. They argued that the federal government had exclusive commerce power and that power superseded state laws. They took their case to court and Livingston and Fulton responded by attempting to undercut their rivals. They would offer them franchises, which they could still control, and they would buy their boats. It…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cilvil Rights Movment Dbq

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Boynton v. Virginia The supreme court said the interstate passengers were protected by the Interstate Commerce Act…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation the federal government did not have the power to regulate commerce. As a result the government did not receive any money, the states were not taxed. The congress had power to tax the states and could only request that the states donate money for the Nation’s needs. Moreover, none of the states paid any money to congress. According to Document A, where the Rhode Island Assembly pleads to congress to not tax the imports of the states products, it shows Congress’s inabilities to tax the states. In addition to congress’s inability to tax the states, it also lacked the power to regular currency. All of the states were printing their own paper money. This often led to difficulties in trade for merchants, as there were no currency exchanges. As a result, trade between Great Britain declined, while the population continued to increase according to Document B. Furthermore, oftentimes a state printed more money when the economy was in trouble which led to inflation. Congress’s inability to regulate commerce under the Articles of Confederation led to a very unstable economy in the United States during 1981-1789.…

    • 799 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    3. In this trial, the Supreme Court decided that the federal government had ultimate authority in regulating interstate commerce, and that all state commerce laws had to comply with the Federal commerce laws.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision to regulate interstate commerce grew mostly out of the rebate, and long-haul, short-haul discriminations of the railroads. The growing feeling that the business were running their businesses only to end in a monopoly is led the Congress to…

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. The Constitution created a system of dual sovereignty, meaning the federal government has exclusive power in interstate commerce. True…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress lacked the power to control foreign commerce and there was an unfavorable balance of trade under the government. During the Confederation period, exports to Britain had drastically decreased. This was because the British closed the West Indies market to any American ships and also people in the US were buying more products from the Britain rather than exports. Another obstacle was that Spain closed the New Orleans port for American commerce and also they were claiming their boundary in America's territory . John Jay- Foreign affairs minister under…

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The structure of The Articles of Confederation led to the 1787 Constitution by failing to decrease the nation’s debt, decide on rulings efficiently, and enforce acts adopted . Through situations such as Shay’s Rebellion and the obstruction of trade by the Spanish government on the Mississippi River, the federal government demonstrated its lack of authority and coherence. The original strategy for the new nation was to present the federal government with very little power and allow the states to run as they pleased to avoid oppression from a national body. This mindset led to Congress becoming unable to tax the states to help eradicate the debts accumulated during the Revolution. Each state had its own regulations for trade and denied the national government any money. Although pleasing to the individual states, unregulated trading and…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps one of the greatest failures of the Article was the inability to control trade. Trade is a major income and help for the economy as well as a necessity for the common American. Trade brings in products from all over the world that could not be provided nor produced, to the countries that receive the products. According to the Articles, Congress only had the power to control trade with the Native Americans, and even that small amount of power could be argued by the discontent of state representatives. The states passed almost all laws regarding trade whenever they saw fit. The central government was supposed to deal with issues concerning foreign trade but because of the ban of different imports of certain products as well as exports, this too became a struggle. The states having had most of the power did lack the ability to control foreign trade; this created a vicious cycle of states wanting foreign trade, so they passed the issue to the central government that didn’t have enough power because of the states. Each state had its very own trading policy creating no united policy that benefited all of the states as a unit. America was sinking in economic havoc, they had little income and products coming in that were so needed to keep the economy afloat.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    should be preserved by the federal constitution, Jefferson stresses how our country is “too large” to have our “affairs directed by à single government” (doc à). States must preserve the rights they were granted. In his letter to Samuel Miller, Jefferson supports the bill of rights stating “Certainly no power prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in religious discipline”(doc b). He makes it clear how the federal government has no power to change à religion based on his comment. Closing off all trade with foreign countries invited criticism to Jefferson from John Randolph, who preached that the government should be weak and shouldn’t have the power to regulate commerce and equalize duties; both are not granted by the constitution (doc f). As well as Randolph, farmers were not particularly thrilled by this regulation. Jefferson's Embargo Act took away farmers platform to market their crops and enabled their lose of income because merchants turned to smuggling from British goods (doc…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What zinn means by saying the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 “gives away the secret of reform legislation in America is, the act required the railroad rates to be reasonable and just. However it did not empower the government to fix specific rates. The law was the first federal law to regulate private industry in the United States.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    III. The History of the case being appealed to the Supreme Court and the decisions of the lower courts…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays