Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

AP US DBQ

Satisfactory Essays
910 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
AP US DBQ
Elliott Gengo AP US
DBQ Summary 10/7/14

Document A Thomas Jefferson wrote to Gibeon Granger about the powers of the states. Jefferson believes the country is too large to have a single federal government. He believes that the states should have some power too. Jefferson says the Republicans have accepted these rights from the Constitution and the federalists have opposed them.
Document B Jefferson tells Samuel Miller that the Constitution doesn’t give the federal government the power to require any religious activity or accept control in religious activity. This then must be the power of the states.
Document C The turtle or Ograbme represents the Embargo Act of 1807. The Embargo Act was put in place to hurt the British by banning American trade with the British. The snapping turtle biting the American in the pants represents how the Embargo Act actually hurt the Americans. This act devastated the American economy.

Document D Daniel Webster, a Federalist, gives a speech to the House of Representatives about drafting an army by compulsions. He pounces on Madison’s policies to draft an army without a formal right form congress. This went against the Republican beliefs because they believed in a small army and in isolationism. He asks why the government has the right to take men from their families to fight for the government. These men are unwilling to fight. This power to draft an army gives Congress the power to create a dictator.
Document E The Hartford Convention resolved these things:
No new state shall enter the United States by Congress without two thirds of the vote in both houses.
Congress doesn’t have the power to put an embargo on the citizens of the United States for more than 60 days
Congress doesn’t have the power to ban commercial trade between the United States and any foreign country without two thirds of the vote in both houses.
Document F John Randolph speaks about the proposed tariffs. He says that the Jefferson administration is trying to gain more power. They now focus on old Federalism and create in into something called republicanism. Randolph wants Congress to get rid of the tariff because it favors the manufacturers.
Document G Thomas Jefferson writes to Samuel Kercheval that some people look at the constitution hypocritical awe. They think that the constitution can’t be touched. The men that wrote it had more wisdom. Thomas Jefferson thinks as men get smarter and new discoveries made the constitution should also advance and be amended.
Document H John Madison considered the bill for internal improvements, but had to veto it. This bill would set aside funds to construct roads and canals, and improve the navigation of watercourses. Madison is aware of the importance of these things but this power is not given by the Constitution. John Madison believes that the success of the Constitution depends on the division of power between the federal and the state governments.

Federalists
Jeffersonian Republicans
Loose
Strict
Loose
Strict

E
C
A

F
B

G
H

H

Elliott Gengo

During the early 1800s, two dominating political parties started to form, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. Two different interpretations of the Constitution characterized these parties. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in a strict perspective, meaning they should abide the Constitution word for word. The Federalists believed in a loose or broad interpretation of the Constitution, meaning the Constitution can be shaped to their needs. Presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, Jeffersonian Republicans, would often contradict themselves and apply Federalist ideals. The same goes for the Federalists; they also changed their views to Jeffersonian Republican ideals occasionally. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in powerful state governments, a weak federal government and strict judgment of the Constitution in order to preserve it. Thomas Jefferson started to contravene the beliefs of his own Republican party during his presidency when he bought the Louisiana Territory from France. The Louisiana Purchase went against many Jeffersonian beliefs because the Constitution did not give the federal government the power to buy land for the Union. Jefferson again contradicted strict constructionism when he passed the Embargo Act of 1807. This closed trade with foreign nations and made the federal government strong by giving it power to regulate commerce and adjust tariffs. This also goes against the Republican belief of a weak central government. Jefferson supported Federalist beliefs a third time when he wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval stating that the Constitution should be revised to keep pace with current times. Federalists, not Jeffersonian Republicans, believe the Constitution should be changed and manipulated. James Madison also contradicts his beliefs during his presidency by using broad constructionism during the War of 1812. He had to build up the army in preparation for the war, but it went against the Republican belief of a small peacetime army. Getting involved with the war also interfered with the Republican belief of isolationism. James Madison did stick to his beliefs in the vetoing of an Internal Improvements Bill. He vetoed the bill because the power to construct roads and canals was not given to the federal government in the Constitution. Federalists also contradicted themselves and their ideals at the Hartford Convention when they agreed to weaken the central government and give more power to the states. During the time period of 1801 to 1817 both the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists adjusted their interpretation of the Constitution. The Jeffersonian Republicans contradicted their beliefs many times during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    States don’t have the authority to substantially inhibit the flow of commerce and where the need for national uniformity in laws.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World 2006 Dbq

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The flow of silver during the mid-16th century to the early 18th century had a great impact on the social and economic aspects of many countries through trade. It had an effect on the land and on the value of silver. The idea of the Ming Chinese government, that all domestic taxes and trade fees be paid in silver created greater economic opportunities, but also caused a growing social division within China.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the states have no competence in religious matters, government is prohibited from sanctioning any particular religion by codifying its confession of faith into civil law. The first amendment is freedom, do we have that today, school budgeting and finance is not a…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Health Care Mandate

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Commerce Clause according to our textbook is “One of the powers grand by Article I, §8 of the Constitution, it gives Congress exclusive power to regulate international commerce and concurrent power with the states to regulate domestic commerce.” (6, pg G3) The Commerce Clause can be rather broadly interpreted but put simply that means Congress has the power to control trade.…

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “…I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church [and] state.” These words, spoken by Thomas Jefferson in his letter to the Danbury Baptists in 1802, reassured the nation of his support of the First Amendment. The wall Thomas Jefferson illustrates shows the people that our nation’s government will not act against a body of people for their religious tendencies. This statement in the amendment, which the Danbury Baptist Association clarifies as separation between church and state, promotes the positive growth of religion while preserving individual freedoms. By allowing a unilateral practice of religion, the government preserves the people the freedom to express his or her own beliefs. Separation of church and state is rapidly becoming an issue in the school system because faculty and students have been abusing their rights under the First Amendment. Although the First Amendment allows one the freedom to practice whatever religion they choose, choosing when to practice their religion is what effects the purpose of separation of church and state. I firmly support Thomas Jefferson’s position that there is a wall of separation between church and state and that the government provides an equal balance of the two within the public school system.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was defiantly founded on principles of freedom and democracy, both of which are held in the most important governmental document. Since this nation’s conception, the US Constitution has served as a foundation for identifying the separation of powers between branches of the government, and the rights and civil liberties of citizens. In the First Amendment, it states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” (US Const. Amend. I). While this ensures Americans are granted the freedom to follow any religion of their choosing and subsequently…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religious groups should be able to participate in government because the separation of church and state denies them the civil liberty to participate in politics armed with ideas formed from their spiritual values in the public square (Dreisbach). Thomas Jefferson’s…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moot Court

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I do agree that Congress does in fact have the authority to abolish the trade…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America’s democratic claims are also reinforced by the strict separation of powers that is stipulated in the Constitution. The Executive has no direct influence in…

    • 5969 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civics study guide

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    31. Name the group, who opposed the new constitution, because they felt the gov’t had too many powers?…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should any constraint be put on a business if they decide to export commodities which have been banned from sale in the United States?…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chap006

    • 5773 Words
    • 22 Pages

    The US continues to restrict trade in technological and militarily sensitive products as well as in textiles, sugar, and other basic products in response to domestic political pressures.…

    • 5773 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    not be contrary to law, public policy, national economic policy, or in restraint of trade;…

    • 36121 Words
    • 145 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Congress cannot pass irrepealable laws. Since Congress’ powers are plenary, and limited only by the Constitution, any attempt to limit the powers of future Congresses via an irrepealable law is not allowed.…

    • 5055 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays