Wal-Mart is the world’s largest retailer. They are the leading private employer with over 2 million employees. Currently, there are 8,500 stores, across 15 countries. Wal-Mart has a massive economic impact in the U.S and other countries of operation. I will argue that Wal-Mart’s disregard for moral business practices through the lack of their social responsibility has had a negative consequence. Their only interest seems to be in making a significant profit at the cost of sacrificing good ethical moral business practices. I will provide evidence for this belief by showing how “everyday low-prices” are effecting employees, customers, taxpayers, and other countries. I will show the reason for the need for change in their business. Wal-Mart has a powerful impact on the countries that they operate in. I believe that Wal-Mart has a social responsibility to model a successful business through good moral ethics. Wal-Mart has become a popular retailer giant for having the lowest prices and a variety of products. While having low prices noticeably has benefits for consumer, growing evidence from across the country indicates that these benefits come at a steep price for employees earning low-wages, unaffordable health car, and poor labor conditions. Public outcry for Wal-Mart’s lack of social responsibility for their employees is a constant battle. They have the potential to improve their business practices in regards to low-wages, unaffordable health car, and poor labor conditions overseas with out changing their business model of “everyday low prices”. There will be others who disagree with my assessment of Wal-Mart. They might possibly show the benefits of Wal-Mart’s moral business practices; such as, how Wal-Mart creates jobs, new source of tax-revenue and their charity donations to communities.
One of the largest concerns facing Wal-Mart is the poor treatment of their workers. Wal-Mart first unmoral practice is shown through their disregard for their employees. They are only required to pay employees the minimum wage in each state. Low-wage jobs do not assist employees, especially those with families. An average worker makes between $12,000 and $17,000 a year, which is not much (Real Change News ). One of the main reasons for Wal-Mart’s low wages is due to the fact they want to continue offering low prices. “Wal-Mart's ultimate defense is that it offers lower prices and somehow that justifies all sins." (www.usatoday.com) Taxpayers are subsidizing the world’s largest retailer. Wal-Mart typically doesn’t pay its workers enough to live on. They rely on the government to assist their employees through welfare programs. Therefore, we, as taxpayers, pay for Wal-Mart’s cost-cutting tactics (Real Change News ). The Democratic staff of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce estimated a breakdown of the cost for one 200-employee store. On average, $36,000 a year is spent toward free or reduced school lunches. In addition, there would be roughly $42,000 spent on rental assistance. In households with two parents, with two children, there would be $125,000 a year for federal tax credits and deductions for low-income families (Turley). Overall, the committee estimates that a one 200-person store could possibly result in excess cost of $420,740 a year for federal taxpayers (Turley). The CEO of Wal-Mart makes an annual salary of $35 million. Studies have shown that the CEO makes in an hour what the average employee makes in a whole year (Turley). Enough is enough. Wal-mart, which posted an enormous annual profit of around $13 billion last year can afford to increases workers salaries with out changing prices. I think it is a wrongful business model allowing Wal-Mart to pay workers such low wages. I believe that taxpayers need to stop subsidizing low wages. Let Wal-Mart pay their workers a living wage. They need to be forced into improving their wages and benefits for their employees. According to the Center for Labor Research...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document