Preview

Bourgeoisie Vs Proletariat Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
868 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bourgeoisie Vs Proletariat Essay
One basic tenet Karl Marx's defines in his famous Manifesto of the Communist Party is the distinguishing characteristics of two opposing social classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie also known as the “capitalist” are the ones who own the means of production. Because of their wealth, they also have the power to control pretty much everything. The proletariat known as the “workers” do not own nor have any control of the means of production but earn money from the bourgeoisie by providing their labor for very little money. How is the proletariat held in subjugation? Well the bourgeoisie has ownership of the mean of production, class consciousness because the proletariats worked too hard that they had no social relationship …show more content…
The use value is a direct relationship between you and a product. For example, a cup holds water so you can have a drink. The exchange value is anything that has a direct value and can be exchanged for other commodities. For example, diamonds have very little usefulness but have a high value in trade for other commodities. The surplus value is the total cost of a manufacture product minus what it costs to produce it. For example, a company makes a car for five thousand dollars but sells it for twenty thousand even though it only cost them five thousand to make it When it comes to use value of labor, exchange value of labor, and surplus value it helps us understand the exploitative nature of capitalism because you can reduce the cost of production by reducing the proletariat pay, increase the speed that the proletariat produce, or cut their hours and benefits. Basically all these things are manipulated by the bourgeoisie.
Karl Marx believed that there are five aspects of proletariats alienation that occur in a capitalist society. The product of labor, the work process, co-workers, species-potential, and themselves are the five specific aspects of alienation that occur in a capitalist

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the communist manifesto, Marx divides society into two main classes, the bourgeoisie, who are the owners of the means of production and employers of wage labourers, and the wage labourers themselves, the proletariat working class. The bourgeoisie, he claims, by their very capitalist nature, exploit the proletariat workers by unfairly controlling the wealth and means of production, thus forcing the proletarians to sell their only real asset, their labour in order to survive. Marx then goes on to argue that the proletarians must revolt against the capitalist society that treats them so unjustly in order to equally distribute the wealth and power. He reinforces this by saying, "Not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons-the modern working class-the proletarians." (Ref. 2) and "Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product."(Ref 3) These statements would indicate that Marx regarded the proletarians to be the only revolutionary class under capitalism. But why does Marx regard them in this way?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Marxism theory, the proletariat are being exploited by the bourgeoisie as they own the means of production which indicates that they are the basis of the whole society and they control everything in it including the family. This kind of system could be seen as a capitalist society which means it makes the rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the books introduction, Engels, one of the manifesto’s co-authors, defines the bourgeoisie as the class of the capitalist who controls means of production in society. Likewise, he considers the proletariat to be the working majority, which sells its labor to support a system it has no control over (7). Marx, on the other hand, works to apply moral judgments to these two classes, allowing for him to write on more than just a class struggle. His bourgeoisie is exploitative, manipulative, and inherently evil, while he sees the proletariat as the masses destined to rule itself (10, 17) .…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his writing of Estranged labour, Marx considers labour to be a conscious act, not just a physical. He compares the situations under feudal and capitalist societies. Through labour Marx believes, human beings perform three funcions: derive their subsistence and survival; establish a relationship with their product; use the productive labour in their lives. (sidvents, 2013)…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They took power from these people and finally the society is divided into two separate classes directly facing each other; bourgeois and proletarians. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 2) Now, according to Karl Marx, it's the time for the proletarians to take power from the bourgeois and create a new world order. In the document, Karl Marx also argued that in the process of doing their job in wiping out the feudal system, bourgeois created the system that will lead to their own collapse, which is full of exploitation and unequal distribution of wealth. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 4) Hence, like every time when there is a strong divide between classes in the society, it is the time for a revolution to occur. It is the necessary step for the society to progress further, and it can only be attained by "the forcibly overthrow of all existing conditions." (The Communist Manifesto, p.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl characterized two main conflicts between class, the capitalist (upper class) who owned the means of production and proletariat (working class) who work but does not owns the means of production but sell their labour power to bourgeoisie (middle class) in return for wages.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Societies evolve and become more complex. As they do so, the means of production change, as do the relations of production.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The proletariat are the workers in society and the bourgeoisie are the ‘affluent’ business owners and doctors and lawyers of society. Karl Marx, who was a Marxist and started the movement, said that society has two classes of people and they are the two which have just been mentioned.…

    • 335 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This quote communicates to the reader that the Bourgeois don't want to lose the Proletariat physically but in fact, they are losing them because the work the Proletariat are doing is making them become extinct in terms that they are no longer becoming human. The little things a person does at home like spend time with his family, perform hobbies during his leisure time, maintain his home, etc. which makes him human, is no longer part of the person's life as he becomes a worker, a Proletarian, the class in society that is mistreated and looked down upon. Marx has pointed how a worker loses his life and himself to the product of his creation and even becomes estranged from his own class but in essence, his life, himself, and his whole social class is what makes them a culture. However, the Proletariat, although a human species, no longer become a species as their work removes their culture from inside of each…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will outline the emerging difference between the very rich (Bourgeoisie) and the very poor (Proletariat) . In the Communist Manifesto, it describes these classes as one being superior over the other, or in other words, one class acting as the oppressor and the other acting as the oppressed. In society through the ages, it was classes fighting amongst themselves, but nowadays, its two classes separating further apart. The Bourgeoisie are simply, bosses, owners etc. They are earning buckets of money. On the other side, the Proletariat, are the poor people who are barely able to make a decent pay and somewhat are struggling to survive. They are working class people, but as new machines are being developed in the workplace, they are struggling to keep their jobs. I am going to reference my work from books and the internet as that they will be the assets in writing this essay. In today’s world, the Bourgeois would be like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx believed that there are four aspects of a man's alienation that occur in a capitalist society. The product of labor, the labor process, our fellow human beings, and human nature are the four specific aspects of alienation that occur in a capitalist society.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to understand Marx a few terms need to be defined. The first is Bourgeoisie; these are the Capitalists and they are the employers of wage laborers, and the owners of the means of production. The means of production includes the physical instruments of production such as the machines, and tools, as well as the methods of working (skills, division of labor). The Proletariat is the class of wage-laborers, they do not have their own means of production, and therefore they must sell their own labor in order to survive. There are six elements to Marx’s view of class struggle; the first is that classes are authority relationships based on property ownership. The second is a class defines groupings of individuals with shared life situations, thus interests. The third is that classes are naturally antagonistic by virtue of their interests. The fourth is that imminent within modern society is the growth of two antagonistic classes and their struggle, which eventually absorbs all social relations. The fifth is that political organization and power is an instrumentality of class struggle, and reigning ideas are its reflection. The sixth is that structural change is a consequence of the class struggle. The following is a summary of The Communist Manifesto which demonstrated the above details.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx Alienation Essay

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For Marx, alienation involved both a description of certain features of capitalism society and a value judgment that they are fundamentally wrong. Although it is not easy to tell which features he is criticizing. He was not totally condemnatory of capitalism: he acknowledged that it leads to a great increase in productivity. Marx believed that capitalism is a necessary stage through which society has to go, but he thought that it will be surpassed.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Class , Karl Marx

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Marx’s view, “There are two main social clusters: a subject class and a ruling class” (Haralambos and Holborn: 37), a ruling class is the bourgeoisie and a subject class is the proletariat. The bourgeoisie has more power, the proletariat has less power and there is conflict interest between them. The reason of the conflict interest it is, because the bourgeoisie have opposing interest to the proletariat.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    commodity

    • 1636 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Commodities are objects that satisfy human needs and wants. Commodities are the fundamental units of capitalism, a form of economy based on the intense accumulation of such objects. The basic criterion for assessing a commodity’s value is its essential usefulness, what it does in the way of satisfying need and wants. This usefulness is its use-value, a property intrinsic to the commodity. Commodities also possess an exchange-value, the relative value of a commodity in relation to other commodities in an exchange situation. Unlike use-value, exchange-value is not intrinsic to a commodity. Exchange-value allows one to determine what one commodity is worth in relation to another commodity, for example how many units of corn one might exchange for a given unit of linen. In a complex market, all sorts of different commodities, although satisfying different needs and wants, must be measurable in the same units, namely money.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays