Preview

commodity

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1636 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
commodity
Commodities are objects that satisfy human needs and wants. Commodities are the fundamental units of capitalism, a form of economy based on the intense accumulation of such objects. The basic criterion for assessing a commodity’s value is its essential usefulness, what it does in the way of satisfying need and wants. This usefulness is its use-value, a property intrinsic to the commodity. Commodities also possess an exchange-value, the relative value of a commodity in relation to other commodities in an exchange situation. Unlike use-value, exchange-value is not intrinsic to a commodity. Exchange-value allows one to determine what one commodity is worth in relation to another commodity, for example how many units of corn one might exchange for a given unit of linen. In a complex market, all sorts of different commodities, although satisfying different needs and wants, must be measurable in the same units, namely money.
Exchange-value as monetary value is what one means when one says a commodity has “value” in a market. Marx poses the question of where this value comes from. His answer is that universal measure for value, expressed in terms of money, corresponds to the amount of labor time that goes into the making of each commodity. Labor time is the only thing that all commodities with different use-values have in common and is thus the only criterion by which they are comparable in a situation of exchange. This is Marx’s labor theory of value. This theory implies that commodities have a social dimension because their exchange value is not intrinsic to them as objects but instead depends on the society’s entire division of labor and system of economic interdependence, in which different people produce different products for sale on a common market. Exchange-value allows this market to function. As an expression the amount of “congealed labor” in a given commodity, the value of that commodity, measured in monetary terms, always refers to the system of social and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Traditionally when discussing value we refer to the economic systems three variables; Exchange value, utility value, and intrinsic value. In simplistic terms, this is basically the value of the object, what the object is used for and the personal experience gained from…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    terms of jsis 200

    • 9460 Words
    • 15 Pages

    used as a means of exchange. This creates a de facto gold standard, where the value…

    • 9460 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern political economic theory and philosophy can be greatly attributed to the works of two men who seemingly held polar opposite views on the subject. Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher, published his most well known work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776 and is most often associated with the ideas and principles of the political economic system known as Capitalism. At the other end of the spectrum is Karl Marx; the German philosopher most often associated with Communism and the author (or co-author) of The Communist Manifesto. This paper seeks to discuss the core differences in their respective political economic philosophies with regards to what economic value is and what the role of government should be in their versions of political economy. This will conclude with the argument that while Smith's work had laid the foundation for modern economic philosophy, it was Marx who would ultimately leave the most significant impression upon the world with his revolutionary ideas.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, Karl Marxl reasoned that workers would be broken by any capitalist, or factory owners, because he believed that a capitalist system provides an advantage for the rich and a disadvantage for the poor. The rich would get richer and the poor would get poorer. Furthermore, the “capitalist” is always in a better position to negotiate a low wage for his workers, he argued. One of his notable and more arguable theories claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Interestingly, Karl Marx also had his own drastic, political ideas that were far away from those of Adam Smith’s.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This progression has afforded capitalist leaders the ability to achieve social control over the masses. Marx, in the essay Fetishism of Commodity, criticizes capitalism for exploiting people for their labor. A commodity, according to Marx, can have a use-value because it satisfies a person’s need or it can have an exchange-value, because it has value in relation to something else. Regardless, all commodities are a result of an infusion of labor.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commodity Fetishism

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his works, Carl Marx distinguishes the user-value of commodities from their exchange-value. The user value is the use that the commodity has to the labourer or the creator of the product whereas the exchange value is the use the commodity has to the fetishized value that they have as commodities.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx defines a commodity as “an external object, a thing which satisfies through its qualities human needs of one kind or another” (Marx). The value of said commodity, does not come from its use value, but in its exchange value or what it can be traded for. A commodity can also have sign-exchange value, which refers to the elevated social status the commodity gives to its owner (Tyson, 62). Marx states in his book Capital Volume that, "The common substance that manifests itself in the exchange value of commodities, whenever they are exchanged, is their value. That exchange value is the only form in which the value of commodities…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, a commodity is a good or service that is actively produced for sale in a labour process. A commodity can result from peasant, petty commodity, state production, cooperative production, or social enterprise as well as capitalist production – what matters is its production for sale (Polanyi 2001, 71). Fictitious commodities as for instance labour are things that were not originally produced to be sold on a market. Even though under certain conditions labour can transformed into commodity (Polanyi 2001, 71).…

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donors

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While the similarity with ordinary commodities was clear when I examined responses to changes in income and prices, it is less so when I wanted to determine what motivates individuals to make such a purchase or contribution. What is it that individuals get in return from these transactions? What tradeoffs…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith to Durkheim

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Smith saw two kinds of value: the value in use and the value in exchange. The value in use is the amount of use that a product has, water for example has a great value in use. The other one is the value in exchange, which is the amount of value a thing has that allows a person to exchange it for another or to purchase another. The measure of this exchangeable value consists in the labor that was spent on it. There are of course, two kinds of labor as well. The labor content and labor commanded. Man his self interest goes into labor and the labor content is that amount of labor which allows him to supply himself. With the arrival of the division of labor, the effort man places in supplying himself is lessened…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Commodity Exchange

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages

    An entity, usually an incorporated non-profit association, that determines and enforces rules and procedures for the trading of commodities and related investments, such as commodity futures. Commodities exchange also refers to the physical center where trading takes place.…

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a capitalist economy, production of a commodity is decided by the forces of demand and supply. As the production of a commodity depends upon its demand and supply,…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Commodities

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - how the fact that the commodities flow globally affects their value to people in different places;…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics