Preview

Outline and Evaluate the View that the Nuclear Family plays a Negative Role in Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
496 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Outline and Evaluate the View that the Nuclear Family plays a Negative Role in Society
According to the Marxism theory, the proletariat are being exploited by the bourgeoisie as they own the means of production which indicates that they are the basis of the whole society and they control everything in it including the family. This kind of system could be seen as a capitalist society which means it makes the rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer. In addition, Zaretsky(1976) sees the nuclear family as a contributing factor to the capitalist system for a number of reasons. For example, the family consumes the commodities produced by capitalism that helps the bourgeoisie to make profits, but this is negative for the proletariat family as they spend their money to help the ruling class. Another example is that the proletariat produces future generations of workers who will go on to make profits for the bourgeoisie which makes them even wealthier. Lastly, the family socializes its children into norms and values which supports the position of the ruling class through obeying the authority and unquestioningly accept inequality as ineitability of life. This si negative of the subject class as they will continue to serve the ruling class, but it is positive for them as they get a lot of generations of worker. These views are supported by David Cooper(1972), who sees the family as 'an ideological conditioning device' in which children learn to conform to authority to become cooperative and easily exploited workers. Furthermore, Engels(1884) sees that the family structure controls female sexuality so that men could be certain of the paternity of children, with marriage allowing them to control women's sexuality. Moreover, Marxism highlights that the family benefit some groups more than others. It highlights the importance of economic influences on family life and it raises the possibility that the ruling class benefits more that the subject class. It also see that the family provides comfort to alienated workers to enable them to carry on working

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Each group in society has a different idea on what the main role of the family is. As Item 2B says, “Marxists see all social institutions as serving the interests of capitalism.” This includes the family, and they say that it serves the interests of capitalism by maintaining and justifying class inequality and exploitation by the rich. Other groups, however, have different opinions, such as Functionalists who think that the family performs essential needs of society. Marxists and Functionalists opinions are completely contrasted, as Marxists think that we live in a Capitalist society based on unequal conflict between the classes, whilst Functionalists see society as based on “value consensus”, where everyone agrees.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many sociologists (e.g. Goran Therborn) argue that the typical nuclear family has disintegrated due to many different reasons, for example, the rise in feminism and women gaining more independence; higher diversity of relationships for example higher divorce rates, higher number of families co-habiting. his is because families aren’t like what they used to be. In the nuclear families today, the roles of the mother and father are no longer segregated conjugal roles. In the nuclear family today roles are changing and developing into integrated conjugal roles. Partners are becoming more egalitarian which is leading to the nuclear symmetrical family. Due to the symmetrical family developing socialists believe the idea of the ‘new man’. A man that shares housework and the responsibility of the children.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Murry – underclass, sponging of the welfare state, defined by underclass by benefit system and is likely to have low morals…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Engels believed that during the early stages of human evolution, property was collectively owned and that the family did not exist. The community itself formed the family and there was no limitation to sexual access. However, with the emergence of private ownership of property and the idea of having heirs who were to inherit the property…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murdoch (1949) claimed the family was a universal institution. He studied 250 societies and found the family, in some form, was present in all of them. This suggests that families are necessary in some way, whether it be for societies to survive, for individual well-being or indeed both.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology 24 marks

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, Engels argued that the family developed so that males were sure to have paternity, we see this through how marriage allows control over a woman’s sexual role. Some functionalists would say that the family provides key functions for society but the Marxist might be ignoring the benefits of some of these functions.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxist feminists argue that the nuclear family functions to benefit the capitalist’s ideology and the patriarchal ideology. Marxists feminists argue that the focus on women as mothers puts considerable pressure on women to have children and to take time out of the labour market to bring them up. This pressure can make women feel oppressed which can be beneficial to capitalists and men as it stops women from rising up against them and trying to break the model of the stereotypical ‘housewife’ role.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Families Comparison EssayA family is a most precious identity a person can have. An individual from a noble, average or poor family can be distinguished by the character, acts, behavior, and living style. A person spends most of his time in life with the family and thus the family contributes the most in an individuals growth, thinking and behavior. When we think of a western family, the standard nuclear family comes to mind, working father, stay-at-home mom and a flock of children. This is no longer the case, in the past 50 years the family has changed significantly and continues to change. These changes are greatly due to the equalization of women's rights and the massive expansion of available communications technology. In many families nowadays both parents work and when the children are young are put into daycare services that just were not around in the past. It is now worthwhile for both parents to work since many companies provide the aforementioned daycare for free. Women also have greatly increased earning potential since they are just as educated and will now make the same amount of money as men for doing the same job. Women are hired these days to do other jobs than to be secretaries and nurses. The families of 1950s are considered as ideal and are also known as nuclear families. It consists of a working husband, a housewife and their children mostly two in which the elder one is boy and the younger one is girl. The families of 1950s and mine have a lot of differences because of the change of culture in the society. They include the structure, role, values of education and outlook on future.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asses the Marxist view that the main role of the family is to serve the interest of capitalism.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In their prediction of the downfall of capitalism and the victory of socialism and eventually, communism, Marx and Engels conducted a historical analysis of the contradictions between the proletariat and bourgeoisie. The proletariat is a class that evolved out of the societal and economic conditions of the Industrial Revolution. The proletariat is defined in the Manifesto as "a class of laborers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists believe that in the family the dominant interest is of capitalism. Children plead with their parent’s for new and stylish items, the parent’s give in and allow the child to have the item, and this is a typical example of capitalism.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Engels would say that monogamy became more important so that the children of the capitalist classes would be able to inherit their parent’s property, companies and wealth. He argues that Capitalism depends on the patriarchal monogamous nuclear family. As women were becoming wives to working, successful husbands, they then became designed directly to do housework and socialise the children. A criticism of this would be that Marxists ignore other family types, such as single-parent families and same-sex partnerships. Also that Marxists ignore things such as domestic violence within a household.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As Sociology

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (e) Using material from Item 2B and elsewhere, assess the Marxist view that the main role of the family is to serve the interests of capitalism. (24 marks)…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Using material from Item 2B and elsewhere, assess the view that the nuclear family is no longer the norm. (24 marks)…

    • 2071 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays