Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Widening Gap between Bourgeoisie and Proletariat

Good Essays
665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Widening Gap between Bourgeoisie and Proletariat
The widening gap between Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.

In this essay I will outline the emerging difference between the very rich (Bourgeoisie) and the very poor (Proletariat) . In the Communist Manifesto, it describes these classes as one being superior over the other, or in other words, one class acting as the oppressor and the other acting as the oppressed. In society through the ages, it was classes fighting amongst themselves, but nowadays, its two classes separating further apart. The Bourgeoisie are simply, bosses, owners etc. They are earning buckets of money. On the other side, the Proletariat, are the poor people who are barely able to make a decent pay and somewhat are struggling to survive. They are working class people, but as new machines are being developed in the workplace, they are struggling to keep their jobs. I am going to reference my work from books and the internet as that they will be the assets in writing this essay. In today’s world, the Bourgeois would be like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg. The Bourgeoisie has created massive cities, has greatly increased the urban population when compared to the rural, and has therefore rescued a considerable part of the population from the madness of rural life. For the Bourgeoisie, it must change constantly in the present in order to exploit the modern markets. As a result of their actions, every business if pressured into globalization, and if this is not done, then they fall behind. As a result, the Bourgeoisie ‘create the world after their own image’ (Karl Marx , 84). The proletarians are themselves commodities and are likewise subject to the changes of the market. And as with any other service, businesses want to minimize their cost of production, in this case, the wage that must be paid in order to make use of the worker's labour power. As slaves to their bourgeois superiors, the proletariat is in a constant state of resentment with the bourgeoisie. However, since there is so much of these workers, the rebellions that can be caused are terrifying the Bourgeoisie. However, since the Bourgeoisie is so powerful and since it provides the Proletarians with wages and working skills, their ambitious efforts of trying to destroy the Bourgeoisie prove unworthy. As a result it ensures the continuation that the Bourgeoisie are far more superior than their counter-parts. And as Karl Marx says "What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable" (Karl Marx, 94). During a lecture which was run by Kieran Keohane, we got to know the ‘Forbes’ rich list. But what was astonishing about this list was that there are more billionaires in the world then what there are very poor people. This just proves the point that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Unfortunately, as a result from, there is less money available for the working class people. This also means that the recession is hitting them harder than that of the Bourgeoisie. The proletarians are now struggling to make ends meet and also struggling to keep money coming into the family, which inevitably results in the loss of homes or in worst cases, the loss of families. However, just to show how dominant the Bourgeoisie are, the recession is nowhere near affecting them as badly as the Proletarians. Unfortunately, the gap is getting wider and wider between the Bourgeoisie and the Proletarians. As we can throughout the world, and this country included, the modern day Bourgeoisie are saving vast amount of expenses by hiring foreigners. For example, by providing numerous jobs for the Polish and Latvians in this country, as well as the Irish receiving plentiful jobs in the U.S. and Australia. Again, as a result, the ordinary working class people are suffering. The dole cues are expanding each day and it’s such a sad fact to see especially since there are so many wealthy businesses’ out there.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The bourgeoisie, as Marx has described them are not revolutionary simply because it is in their best interest for things to remain as they are. For the workers, both socially and geographically divided; a gap that is constantly fluctuating in modern times, to compete for smaller and smaller wages that are losing their…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As described in the Communist Manifesto, there was a division of classes that were between the proletariats that were the wageworkers and were used for labor purposes, and the bourgeoisie who were considered the capitalist class and the ones who were at fault for exploitation of the proletariats. The writing in the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, after many years has a form in which it resonates in contemporary society. Having different types of social and working classes has become more relevant throughout society and has caused for issues to arise. Although the ways they are perceived and named have changed throughout the years in different locations, the existence of these classes is still consistent throughout. There…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the books introduction, Engels, one of the manifesto’s co-authors, defines the bourgeoisie as the class of the capitalist who controls means of production in society. Likewise, he considers the proletariat to be the working majority, which sells its labor to support a system it has no control over (7). Marx, on the other hand, works to apply moral judgments to these two classes, allowing for him to write on more than just a class struggle. His bourgeoisie is exploitative, manipulative, and inherently evil, while he sees the proletariat as the masses destined to rule itself (10, 17) .…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution, factory workers received little pay, worked long hours, and never saw improvement in their living and working conditions. In the mean time, the middle class was emerging. They were rich because of the enormous amounts of money created in the country because of the Industrial Revolution. Marx thought that the capitalist system would eventually fail. He described communism as “a form of complete socialism in which the means of production--all land, mines, factories, railroads, and businesses—would be owned by the people” (649). He also thought all goods and services should be shared equally.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Flsa Analysis

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to improve their living conditions, the proletariat of the capitalist countries fought a long battle against the…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United State Labor History

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When one considers the effect that the Industrial Revolutions of the 19th and early 20th century, the workers whose backs bore it are seldom reflected upon. It becomes ponderous whether the revolution was a boon or a malediction upon the working class and if they were truly aided by the great rise in standard of living that hallmarked this time. Those who would defend the period would cite pre-Industrialization scenarios, toiling under feudal lords with no future beyond death and an unmarked grave. An opponent of this idea, such as the renowned Karl Marx, would state, 'The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over the superior socioeconomic system has gone on for over 100 years, and there seems to never be any consensus. In fact, the debate has become so heated that wars have been fought in order to prove supremacy—i.e. the Cold War fought primarily between the USA and the USSR. On one end of this debate lies the communist party that’s goal is to eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor by creating social and economic equality between classes. The opposing party is the capitalists, who strive to for free market economy and individual enterprise. Socialism is the middle ground as it is a mix of both private corporations and government run facilities.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This created a disparity between the rich and the working poor. This stage in society separation, known as socialism and marked by unequal pay for the work performed, is the intermediate stage between capitalism and communism, according to German philosopher and revolutionary socialist Karl Marx’s theory “The Communist Manifest”. (“Karl Marx” 2011) Marx described Communism “as a society in which each person should contribute according to their ability and receive according to their need”. (“Karl Marx” 2011)…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, many philosophers have discussed the issue of class struggle. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both developed theories of the unequal distribution of wealth a long time ago; however the only Carnegie’s ideology could apply to American society today. In “The Communist Manifesto”, Marx first introduces the two main social classes: bourgeois (the upper class) and proletarians (the lower class or working class). He points out the revolution of industrialism has made changes of Capitalism to Communism. He suggests that the rich should redistribute property evenly because the proletarians have put a lot effort contributing in the revolution. In contrast, Carnegie analyzes in “The Gospel of Wealth”, the unequal distribution of wealth is a natural consequence of civilization. Both Marx and Carnegie present the problem within society because they want to contribute their own experiences from various views to resolve the tension between the rich and poor efficiently.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx is an economical and philosophical ideology that is centered on communism. Specifically, it is centered on the redistribution of wealth so that everyone in a specified nation or State is completely equal in wealth for the “betterment” of the society. This in theory eliminates the class system and as a result is intended to eliminate the oppression that comes along with the class separation and wage gap. Thankfully, for me this literary piece’s brilliance does not come simply from Marx’s economic ideals but instead it comes from the simple fact that it exists at all. What challenges me and forces me to strive towards betterment is that the Communist Manifesto serves as a reminder to me that it is…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, a divide has always existed between the rich and poor in society. However, during the Industrial Revolution in Victorian England, this rift reached its peak. The working class labored for long hours and received miniscule wages, whereas the bourgeoisie grew abundantly wealthy through the labor of the working class. Published in 1848 and 1854 respectively, Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto and Charles Dickens’ Hard Times both comment on these troubles. While Hard Times is a novel which tells a story and The Communist Manifesto is a short publication which tries to bring about social change, both writings offer a sharp critique of the class antagonism brought about by capitalism at the height of the Industrial Revolution.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx wrote in 1848, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles"; it still holds true today. Feudal society gave way to democracy, yet the class stratification only intensified. As Marx states "Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps…the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat," or in today's terminology, the have and have-nots. The growing middle and lower classes in America cannot compete with the "old wealth" of the upper class. Some entrepreneurs, who were in the right place at the right time, have managed to climb the social ladder and enter the bourgeoisie. An individual born today is more likely to move down the ladder rather than up. Marx addressed that possibility by stating, "What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave diggers." The bourgeoisie gain strength through political advances at the expense of the proletariat.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socialism In 1800s

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1800s Britain, the Industrial Revolution resulted in the development of a new class society. Change in the definition of societal classes is often credited to class feeling, defining society based on a common source of income (Perkin, 176). In the relevance of socialism, it is important to understand the most crucial class in economic and political change: the working class.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl characterized two main conflicts between class, the capitalist (upper class) who owned the means of production and proletariat (working class) who work but does not owns the means of production but sell their labour power to bourgeoisie (middle class) in return for wages.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As businesses develop and technology advances, the need for the proletariat in the workforce reduces, for example, in the past ten years, automated shopping centre checkouts have flooded large retail outlets. This initial large cost of setup sees a worthwhile overall return as it means fewer employees that they need working in their store at the checkouts. This being motivated by a businesses biggest priority being to make money, not to keep employees working for them. This is not only isolated to retail; factories, farming and car parks have all progressed to automated systems. Because of this automation the proletariat are subsequently let go from their jobs by the bourgeoise.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays