Preview

Analysis of Phaedo by Plato

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1319 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis of Phaedo by Plato
Critical Analysis of “Phaedo” by Plato

Much of the Phaedo by Plato is composed of arguments for the nature of the physical world and how it relates to the after life, for example, the way our senses perceive the world and how indulging in those senses has negative consequences in our after lives. These arguments find basis in scientific analysis of the time as well as the mythos of the his age. One of the key talking points within the story is the theory of forms. The aforementioned theory is formed from two beliefs, the first of which is that our senses deceive us and that there 's an existential plane where perfect beings exist and the perfect ideas of the physical things in the world are there too. All of these concepts are intricately intertwined through out the story although Plato doesn 't explain all of them in great detail. That leaves one to question whether he writes them to justify his life or if perhaps he 's figured something out that we as the readers have not. Despite how questionable some of Plato 's hypotheses are there are a couple that provide an interesting perspective on our world.

The theory of forms spans the entirety of the book and is the most important argument in the Phaedo. This theory is the basis for the classic cave metaphor as well as one of the most referenced beliefs through out the text. The theory of forms comes from the belief that there are two planes of existence consisting of the world we can see and that world that is “beyond” ours. Within the latter plane there are the perfect forms of all the things that we know. A “form” in the Phaedo is a perfect representation of the physical objects and ideas of our world they are also “divine, deathless, intelligible, uniform, indissoluble, always the same as itself.”[1] For example, the form of a table is the perfect idea of what a table should be while an actual table is just the imperfect physical representation of that form. According to Plato it 's not possible for us to



Bibliography: Eva, Brann, Kalkavage Peter, and Salem Eric. Plato 's Phaedo. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing. Roland, Jon. The Constitution, "Plato 's Phaedo." Last modified 2012. Accessed October 30, 2012. http://www.constitution.org/pla/phaedo.htm. --------------------------------- [ 1 ]. . Eva, Brann, Kalkavage Peter, and Salem Eric. Plato 's Phaedo. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing. [ 2 ]. Roland, Jon. The Constitution, "Plato 's Phaedo." Last modified 2012. Accessed October 30, 2012. http://www.constitution.org/pla/phaedo.htm.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The theory of the Forms suggests that there are two worlds in which we live, one is through reality (world of Forms), whilst the other is accessed through our minds (world of Particulars). He highlights that there is only one of each Form while there are many copies of that Form, however, they all share common factors to the Form allowing them to be recognised and compared to. Plato describes the Forms to be perfect, eternal and un-changing whereas the Particulars are imperfect, finite and changing. This can be related to Plato’s conflicting ideas about education in his era, as he believes that the world of Particulars is based on opinion rather than knowledge and so does not approve of this world- the theory of the Forms and the Form of the Good allowed him to express these views showing how the Forms portray the creation of a better, conceptual world. Additionally, Plato describes the Forms to be intelligible, rational and non-corporal which means that his world of Forms cannot be accessed physically and so disproved. This therefore shows the Particulars to be material and corruptible which became a strong ground for us to relate to his theory as the imperfection and continuously changing world…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato thought that there were two worlds: the everyday changing world in which we exist, the world of becoming, and the unchanging world of eternal truths, the world of being. In this world of being Plato illustrates that the eidos, or forms, define what a substance truly is and that each and every thing has a Form on which it falls under. For example, we know the Form of a human so any human we come into contact with, regardless of size, shape, or color; we know to put them in the category of human because they fit the eternal Form. Depicted in his allegory of the cave, Plato comes to the belief that our everyday world is thought not to be an illusion but more like a “set…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prince, Brian D. "The Form of Soul in the Phaedo." PLATO, The electronic Journal of the International Plato Society (2011. ): 1-3. Accessed 23 August 2013.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Plato uses the forms to discuss almost everything. Forms are general concepts that are used to classify different physical concepts. The forms are non physical, mental concepts. Plato utilizes the forms to prove mind-body dualism. The forms are real things, they exist, and are considered to be more real than physical things. It refers to things that are eternal, perfect, unchanging, and universal. The mind is also eternal, not the brain. Forms are concepts or ideas that help categorize objects. The essence of the Forms is concept and this makes it different from physical objects, and for this reason makes it endless. The senses are not the basis of true knowledge, as they are physical, because they are temporary, changing,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato introduced the ‘Analogy of the cave’ to try and illustrate that human being live and only understand a realm of shadows. Within this explanation Plato used many objects as symbols or metaphors to describe the true meaning of forms, for example, The sun is seen as the Form of Good.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As mentioned before, Aristotle has different theories than Plato. He suggests that the forms can be discovered through a examination of the world being natural. Now, Plato believes that forms are farther than what humans can understand, it is way beyond.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay Question: Compare the Characteristics of the true guardians, as described by Plato (Republic, bk VII, pp.158 – 61, 484b – 487e) with the characteristics of the rulers, as described by Machiavelli (The Prince, ch.15, pp. 47 – 49 and ch. 18, pp.54f). What is the most important difference between the two accounts? In your view, which account is better, and why?…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Let’s skip it [fences],” (273) suggested Julian to his mother in Flannery O’Connor’s short story “Everything That Rises Must Converge.” What authoress says herself is “that the good novelist expresses feelings in symbols (qtd. in Paulson 156)”, and that is exactly what she uses in this story. By writing about fences she suggests us to jump over the differences which divide us and let us live on the same side of the fence. This poses one, very significant, question – are there enough similarities between races to raise them high enough and converge? Are we ready to skip the fence or we will rather trip over it?…

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, contained within the Realm of the Forms is the perfect version or copy of everything in the world, and everything in the world is just a copy of the perfect version in the Realm of the Forms, hence the Realm cannot teach us about any physical objects in the world if the object in the Realm is different to all the others on Earth. For example, in the Realm of the Forms will be the perfect version of a chair so, according to Plato, all the chairs in the physical world are copies of the perfect version so the perfect chair cannot teach us anything about a physical chair in the world that we know.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato was from the time of approximately 400BC and stated that the human body with all its parts must owe it’s origin to a creator. Plato was a Pagan and believed in numerous Greek gods. In his work The Timaeus he suggests that a cosmic craftsman (‘the Demiurge’) may have brought together the materials of the universe to make it orderly and beautiful. Plato’s theory of forms (or ideas) lies at the heart of his philosophy. It follows on directly from his allegory of the cave and understanding reality. This theory suggests that a realm of forms exist, perfect ideals of which things in this world are but imperfect. The world that we see around us, according to this theory, is but a pale shadow of the ultimate reality. Things may appear beautiful, or just, insofar as they imitate the form of Beauty and Justice. But the imperfect and changeable world cannot capture the glory of the eternal and immutable…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato was born in 429 B.C.E. and died in 347 B.C.E. he was one of the classical Greek philosopher who was also mathematician. He was one of the most dazzling writers in the Western literary tradition one of the most penetrating, wide-ranging, and influential authors in the history of philosophy, Kraut (2004). Plato travel for many years studying under his teacher Socrates learning from him. He wrote dialogues between Socrates and the other explores who traveled with them. Around the middle of the dialogues is Plato 's Republic. It begins with a Socratic conversation about the nature of justice but proceeds directly to an extended discussion of the virtues, courage and moderation in individual human beings and in society as a whole (Kemerling, 2006). The Dialogues of Plato were the recorded teachings of Socrates. Plato also went to the trial of Socrates and he recorded the speech in the Apology. The Apology was one of the three works that tells us about Socrates last days.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Principle of Specialization

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Plato, Desmond Lee, and Melissa Lane, The Republic, (London: Penguin, 2007), 369d. Plato, The Republic, 374a. Plato, The Republic, 369d. Plato, The Republic, 369e.…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Plato, a perfect society is a society that is organized in a superlatively efficient way, a society, which some scholars consider as an aristocratic government (Phylosophypages, 2001). Plato had it that such a society is made up of the rulers, the soldiers, and the people. In this perfect society, Plato claimed that the guardians of the state are supposed to be people with skills to lead. He was however, incredulous by the fact that this may not be achieved in the future of the perfect society. To this fact he gives an ingenious riposte, such societies will be under the guardianship of the offspring of the current guardians. That means what the future society will be under the guardianship of a not skill but the benefits of inheritance. In such a society, dissatisfaction is possibly the way of the day. Plato maintained that for dissatisfaction an understanding of the nature of the human being is the answer. That is, people are naturally different and they have where they fit in the society (Philosophyprofessor). In such a situation, they will be able to rule the society.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do You Know Yourself?

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout time great philosophers have pondered the question of what knowing your self is. Philosophers like Socrates, Plato, and Alcibiades have somewhat of a similarity when it comes to identifying one’s self. However, there are the differences that lead up to the explanation and what individuals believe the self is. Socrates focused on the ‘good life’ and stresses the fact that to know how to live we need to know who we are. Under Socrates, the founder of philosophy, is the student Plato. He adapted many of Socrates’s ideas, but interpreted them differently. He says, “And I thought that I had better have recourse to the world of mind and seek there the truth of existence” (Phaedo). Alcibiades elaborates with what life is, and how to achieve a full life. He believes that you cannot be the only one to tell yourself who you are, but by the opinions and knowledge of others you can ultimately know yourself, which was argued by Socrates later on. There are multiple aspects that could make up the self. To establish what makes you who you are, we must know what the self is: mind, body, soul, or a combination of them all. I feel that all of those make up the self. Nonetheless, it can be harmful if you know yourself too well. Your mind gives you thoughts, the soul, has a moral foundation, and the body performs tasks. All parts of us are needed to shape who we are.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays