The Design Argument Analysis

“With such signs of forethought in the design of living creature, can you doubt they are the work of choice or design?” (Socrates). The word ‘Telos’ is Greek for purpose. The Teleological argument thus argues that the universe is being directed towards a telos, an end purpose, and the posteriori evidence of an apparent intelligent design in the world. A posteriori argument is based on observations and/or experiences. Furthermore, the teleological argument is based on the character of the world and the universe. For example, our world is a place of such extraordinary interlocking complexity that the only rational explanation is the presence of an intelligent designer. There are two main arguments within the design argument; the first is an
Plato was from the time of approximately 400BC and stated that the human body with all its parts must owe it’s origin to a creator. Plato was a Pagan and believed in numerous Greek gods. In his work The Timaeus he suggests that a cosmic craftsman (‘the Demiurge’) may have brought together the materials of the universe to make it orderly and beautiful. Plato’s theory of forms (or ideas) lies at the heart of his philosophy. It follows on directly from his allegory of the cave and understanding reality. This theory suggests that a realm of forms exist, perfect ideals of which things in this world are but imperfect. The world that we see around us, according to this theory, is but a pale shadow of the ultimate reality. Things may appear beautiful, or just, insofar as they imitate the form of Beauty and Justice. But the imperfect and changeable world cannot capture the glory of the eternal and immutable
In trying to clarify these elements, advocates of the design argument are focused on dismissing an obviously simple clarification: possibility. The elements of request and reason, suitability for human life, even the opportune way of the universe, could all be clarified as a consequence of one tremendous fortuitous event, likened to taking a million six-sided dice and with a solitary toss turning up six on every one of them. The outline contention looks to show that the sensitive equalization of the universe is such that the likelihood of it happening by chance is excessively remote to be even a fractional, not to mention a complete clarification. As an a posteriori contention its utilization of inductive thinking that draws on proof that is all around accessible what's more, this gives the contention enduring