Preview

Machiavelli Plato Rebuplic Prince Comparison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli Plato Rebuplic Prince Comparison
Haþim Cihan Demirköprülü, 20303433

Essay Question: Compare the Characteristics of the true guardians, as described by Plato (Republic, bk VII, pp.158 – 61, 484b – 487e) with the characteristics of the rulers, as described by Machiavelli (The Prince, ch.15, pp. 47 – 49 and ch. 18, pp.54f). What is the most important difference between the two accounts? In your view, which account is better, and why? For centuries, every ruler created their own principles and rules and somehow they ruled millions of people and controlled their future. In this essay, I will try to compare the characteristics of two types of ruler, one is Plato’s true guardian where he mentions in the Republic and the other one, Niccoló Machiavelli’s ruler image in his writings The Prince and state my view whether a true guardian or a harsh ruler is suitable for the mankind.
First of all, it is important to clarify that Plato pays attention to create a utopian world. His idealistic approach aims to provide the perfect society, mostly concerning with how things should be. However, Machiavelli is not concerned in imaginary societies where everything is in an ideal state. He is a realist thinker, interested in how things were in everyday reality not how things could be if the world was perfect [Selected Political Writings, The Prince, ch. 15, p.48].
According to these approaches, the definition of the true guardian of Plato and the ruler of Machiavelli differ from each other. Firstly, Plato signifies that, a true guardian because they are also philosophers, should be impatient for all kinds of learning and acquirement whether large or small, more precious or less so [Republic, p.159, 485b]. This impatience for knowledge arises from true guardian’s philosophical nature. Next, Plato considers the importance of the trustworthiness of a ruler and remarks that “they must be without falsehood – they must refuse to accept what is false, hate it, and



References: - Plato, republic, tr. G.M.A Grube, revised by C.D.C. Reeve, 2nd edition, Hackett (1992) - Niccoló Machiavelli Selected Political Writings, The Prince, ed. And tr. David Wootton. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Niccolo Machiavelli magnificent ideologies for leaders of the world. First Plato’s dialogue Allegory of the Cave described what would happen if prisoners were chained to a wall and could only see the shadows before them. The shadows were visuals on the wall from the fire blazing behind them. Plato stated a quote about what would happen if those prisoners were to be released out of the cave? His reasoning for this was to produce what the human natures method is of gaining knowledge. Then, Niccolo Machiavelli described in The Prince why qualities are essential in succeeding as a prince. He stated that “qualities bring either blame or praise (Machiavelli). Therefore, it is significant to suppress negative qualities and let the positive…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Machiavelli, no matter how extreme, violent at times, rigorous, and blunt he may come across, by setting examples and guides structured around the utilization of ruthlessness and egocentric cunning as the process of gaining political power, showed what a clear mind he had on what it takes to be an awe-inspiring leader, master of the art of winning a battle, and conquering lands. In this paper, by comparing the two, human nature and political potency, through the use of different ideologies of both, Plato and Machiavelli, corroborated that they were very powerful, unparalleled influences in the philosophy of human nature and the processes of political power as theorist of their…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli on Government and Those Who Govern Machiavelli, in “The Prince” and Lao-Tzu in “”Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” have very opposing views. In their writings, they differ on topics such as qualities of a leader, functions of government, and human nature and the world around them. Here I will describe each of their views and compare the differences. Both Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu are philosophers writing in regard to Government, giving advice in ways that they feel people should be governed. Although they both composed their writings long ago, some of the advice given can still be put to good use in our modern world today. Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu are both very intelligent men, and have very clear perspectives on the topics they write about. On the topic of “Qualities of a leader”, Machiavelli has such strong opinions as to how a ruler should carry himself. He writes about whether it is best to be loved or feared, ultimately coming to a conclusion that a leader must be feared in order to govern his people. In his opinion, a leader who is loved is not doing his job. Machiavelli is almost demanding and has a strong need to control. He advises to be a stern leader, obtaining and maintaining power. He seems very power hungry. He discusses trustworthiness, good and bad reputations, and being knowledgeable in history and military. He believes that a leader needs to be perceived and strong and powerful. Machiavelli takes credit for all good in the government. To Machiavelli it is important to not appear weak to others, especially the people. He does not trust his people, and his role is a dictator. Lao-Tzu’s opinion on the qualities of a leader is very different than that of Machiavelli’s. His idea of a leader is compassionate, modest and moral. He believes that a leader should be loved by his people. It’s important to him to be content and confident, stating, “Because he…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's the Prince

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "The state is the highest achievement of man, a progressive and elaborate creation of his free will. The individual, the leader, the people, cooperate in maintaining it." This idea of state was put forth by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, which was in essence a ruler's handbook to governing and maintaining his land. Machiavelli conjured his theories for government by basing his ideas in his belief that men, especially men in power, tend to follow the same directions, and therefore by looking at past leaders and their follies we can better determine how to run a state. "Men are always the same and are animated by the same passions that lead them fatally to the same decisions, acts, an results…. That one can foresee the course of political development by mediating upon the cycles and phases of historical events, and that essential to a statesman is not only the experience of modern events and constant study of the past. But also the ability to exploit this knowledge in actual political actions."…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He talked of ways that a prince could maintain his political power once he has acquired it. This was a new way of discussing political theory because in the past it was about how anyone who was a philosopher would be ruling due to the wisdom and knowledge that could allow him to lead. With a prince, he is born into the family and gains the title of prince through that. Machiavelli takes a family of whom the prince is struggling and basically writes this entire book because of them and presents new ideas of how a prince could stay the way he is and not have to necessarily worry about he or his family being rebelled against. This goes against Plato and Aristotle in more ways in one, but in general, it just goes against their ideas that the philosophers should be the one to rule compared to just one prince. Of course, there are many specific situations in which Machiavelli and Plato/Aristotle differ, but this is just the general idea and was a different viewpoint for many readers and philosophers of Machiavelli's time who knew and respected Aristotle and Plato's…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the assigned passage, Machiavelli reveals that there are particular qualities to being an effective leader, one of which is how a ruler keeps his word. A ruler must acquire trust within his state and among his people in order to be a successful leader. This is done by keeping his word and remaining honest when possible, but more importantly, adapting to his environment and appearing to be honorable when holding his word becomes unpractical. In this paper I will argue in agreement with Machiavelli that the survival of a successful state is dependent upon a ruler’s ability to adapt and maintain his reputation.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Notably, Salman Rushdie who in the chapter is cited as calling Machiavelli a “democrat” and “messenger.” Although Klosterman writes “that’s a different argument for a different book,” (he is more concerned with the immutability of the negative connotation of “Machiavellian” we are nonetheless persuaded to consider this possibility. Perhaps Klosterman included this aside because it parallels his unconventional admiration for Newt Gingrich and in a like manner, although Machiavelli is "culturally unlikeable,” unconventional wisdom suggests the opposite. That is, society only views his mistake of “consciousness” but ignores what’s beneath the villainous veil—ambition, which is admirable (Klosterman…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Far from being a Utopian, Machiavelli analyzed history from a human perspective, separating himself from the Christian view of history seen as providential. He tried to discover how to bring the most good to society in spite of what he considered humanity’s inherent tendency to evil. This view, seen from a historical perspective, goes in defense of freedom, since those who follow the path of pure reason, and often claim to have found the Platonic truth of how we should live our lives, are more than often ready to coerce the rest to conform to it.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli in his book “The Prince” seems to sap the very foundations of morality and stops at nothing short of capsizing the entire edifice of religion. His thoughts resonate with a loathing of true virtue and propagate corrupted politics. Actually, today the term Machiavellianism is used to refer to the use of deceitfulness to advance one’s goals or desires. In ‘The Prince”, Machiavelli breaks from the classical view of virtue as represented by his philosophic predecessors Plato and Aristotle. Whereas his predecessors held virtue in an ideal environment (idealism), Machiavelli defined virtue in a real environment where one is judged by his actions and not by the way his actions ought to be (realism). [pic][pic]…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    While other texts in the wisdom tradition – Plato’s Republic and Aurelius’ Meditation, for example – emphasize the importance of a ruler being “good” and “just”, Machiavelli concerns himself solely with practicality, dismissing the philosophical tradition of holding rulers to moral perfection. Under the light of comparison then, it is easy to dismiss The Prince as an aberration in the history of classical philosophy; after all, it never came to be read by a ruler and Machiavelli himself saw little political success in his life after writing it (Machiavelli, p. 9).…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He did praise those honest Princes but he immediately indicated that it is very important for a Prince to have the know-how of deception. Another very crucial difference between ancient writers and Machiavelli’s The Prince is regarding religion. In ancient writings, religion seems to be the forefront of their writings. Machiavelli believes that religion is the most important thing for a prince too, but he does not focus on it as much as his colleagues did during their time. It is shockingly alarming how a novel titled the Prince is not as involved in the political matter as one may expect it to be given the title of the novel. There is little to no mention of war, except a mention of the need for a Prince to protect his land. Ancient writers give a lot more power to the royalty. Machiavelli believes in the rights of the govern to do what they please. As a matter of fact, Machiavelli’s ideal Prince is probably slightly more powerful than Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of Her Other Realms and Territories. This is something unheard of at the time he wrote The Prince. Plato, in Plato’s Republic, said a ruler must do as he ought to while Machiavelli believes a prince must do what he wishes to do to successfully preserve his…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Securing power and order of a state has been the focus of ancient political philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli’s writings. His most famous writing “The Prince” fortified his untraditional views on how to successfully rule a state. He recognizes through his realist views, that human nature causes a need for any degree of violence required to maintain power, and order in a state. This paper will expose how Machiavelli viewed violence as a necessary, yet moderated tool in order to rule a successful state. The paper will prove this by examining Machiavelli’s approaches to acquiring, maintaining, and defending a state, in his book “The Prince.”…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle and Plato have debated about the Rule of Law. Barker writes about Aristotle's viewpoint and how being ruled by a constitution & rotation of office provides everyone with the same rights and worth, rather than being ruled by a king judging in accordance with his/her own feelings & thereby, not having a 'neutral' mind when exercising authority.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays