Preview

Abortion-Noonan

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abortion-Noonan
Jessica Bratsch
Ethics-Paper 2
“An almost absolute value in history” by John Noonan
“A defense of abortion” by Judith Thomson
“On the legal and moral stance of abortion” by Mary Anne Warren
According to John Noonan, human beings should not be aborted. He discusses whether or not an embryo or fetus is considered a human by society often lies on certain aspects of the developing human and at what stage conception turns into a person with rights. Among them is viability, experience, quickening, attitude of parents, and social visibility. All of these he denies as making one human. Ultimately, John Noonan believes that conception itself should be viewed as the “moment of humanization” (pg. 218) due to the fact that a new genetic code is created and that life should not be taken. His views are that a human is a being with human code and therefore possesses a potential future should not have its rights infringed upon. He validates his views using Christian beliefs to “love your neighbor as yourself” (pg.219 consider the potential human being in place of the neighbor as well as theological comparison of not injuring fellow man. In these cases, abortion is never right except in self-defense.
John Noonan uses the concept that a genetic code creates a human being and therefore it is a human being. I still fail to see how a potential human being is actually a human being. A genetic code is not a person, it is just simply a plan to create a human being. Without development of an actual human by this plan it is nothing more than a potential human being. I would say that this is along the same lines of a seed being a seed and a tree being a tree because clearly a seed is not a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Warren’s thesis is that fetuses are not persons and since only persons have full moral rights and person-like beings have a right to life in particular, fetuses do not have a right to life. She argues that fetuses are not persons because they lack the basic qualifying traits of personhood or moral humanity. She also believes that the rights of persons will always override the rights of potential persons and that there should be no restrictions on when an abortion must occur by. Her argument is a direct response to Noonan’s thesis which is that fetuses are humans and therefore have human rights.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question between whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been talked about for years and no common ground has been made. Judith Thomson, a believer in Pro-choice, argues that abortion is not wrong because the mother should have a choice of what happens to her body. In response to this, Donald Marquis who is against abortion believes every fetus is a human with a right to have a future like ours. Each Ethicist gives examples and theories as to why abortion is wrong or right. In this essay, I will attempt to show that abortion is okay in some cases, and Donald Marquis’s views and arguments are broad and incorrect.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Glover, in his article Matters of Life and Death casts dispersions on both pro-abortion and anti-abortion debates citing them as too knee-jerk emotional reactions diminishing the inherent complexity of the other side (1. Glover, CC2006, p. 0110). Glover comprehensively addresses the key points of both sides of the abortion debate and evaluates their inherent virtues, especially for those who hold these opinions, then methodically points out its flaws. Ultimately, Glover comes to the conclusion that though a fetus is a human at the moment of conception, the right to abort lies with the mother and her own self-determination.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion John T. Noonan

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John T. Noonan makes the argument that the jump in probability for a fetus' coming to term, at a specific point in the development of the fetus, has an important implication for the humanity (personhood) of the fetus. He bases this argument on the reasoning that "life itself is a matter of probabilities, and most moral reasoning is an estimate of probabilities." He goes on to state that his argument in which a fetus has an implication for the humanity of the fetus is strictly an "appeal to probabilities that actually exist." To demonstrate his point concerning probabilities he uses an analogy. The analogy he uses is of a man who shoots into the bushes because of movement in the bushes. If the chances of this movement in the bushes being a man were 200 million to one, then no one would think anything of him firing away into the bushes. However, if the chances are 4 out of 5 that the movement is a man, then you would not be justified in firing into the bushes. He uses this analogy to relate it to the development of a baby. When a male ejaculates he emits about 200 million spermatozoa. Of these 200 million, only one single spermatozoon has a chance to develop into a zygote. Noonan says that therefore, if one spermatozoon is destroyed than you're only destroying a being that had a one in 200 million chance of ever developing into a reasoning being. This would be similar to the case of shooting into the bushes when there is a one in 200 million chance that the movement is that of a man. On the other hand, if a fetus is destroyed, then you're terminating a being that had "an 80 percent chance of developing further into a baby outside the womb who, in time, would reason." This would be similar to shooting into the bushes when the movement has a 4 out of 5 chance of being that of a man. The probability of the baby becoming a full being of reason drastically changes from a single spermatozoon (1 in 200 million) to a fetus (4 out of 5). This probability change…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debate about abortion focuses on two issues; 1.) Whether the human fetus has the right to life, and, if so, 2.) Whether the rights of the mother override the rights of the fetus. The two ethicists who present strong arguments for their position, and who I am further going to discuss are that of Don Marquis and Judith Thomson. Marquis' "Future Like Ours" (FLO) theory represents his main argument, whereas, Thomson uses analogies to influence the reader of her point of view. Each argument contains strengths and weaknesses, and the point of this paper is to show you that Marquis presents a more sound argument against abortion than Thomson presents for it. An in depth overview of both arguments will be presented in the paper, as well as a critique of both the pros and cons that stem out from the question-begging arguments.…

    • 3100 Words
    • 89 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Noonan is an abbot supporter of the pro-life movement and in his essay, How to Argue About Abortion, he provides many arguments to support his theory that abortion is nothing but the destruction of a living, breathing human being. Noonan attempts to prove his point by first showing counter arguments to many of the traditional pro-choice themes that have been brought up over and over in support of abortion. He then goes on to mention many arguments that he feels can clearly illustrate the logical reasoning of the pro-life movement.…

    • 2088 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the beginning of this article, H.Skott Brill summarizes the main idea of Why abortion is immoral by Don Marquis. The main idea is “if a fetus has a right to life then nearly all abortion are immoral” (Brill, 419). However, it does not mean that stopping “the means necessary for the continuation of the fetus life” is wrong (419). Brill continues providing the support for McInerney’s “personal identity objection” and addressing the issue of a fetus…

    • 2214 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judith Thomson’s argument through her article, “A Defence of Abortion” is one that adopts the premise that the fetus is a human being from the moment of conception. By doing this, Thomson is distancing her argument from the various theorists who maintain the moral view that it is wrong to kill another human being, such as (Marquis, 1989). This ultimately allows her to assume various hypothetical situations in which the cognitive status of the fetus is otherwise not considered. This is important. It helps the case she develops to detach itself from the focal points considered in the 'common argument', which illustrates that the development of a human being from conception through birth into childhood and then adulthood is continuous, and to draw a line where abortion is acceptable is futile. Thomson’s argument that contrasts a “right to life” against a “right to decide what happens in and to one’s body" is based on what Finnis describes as “confusing the issue” (Finnis, 1973). Throughout the article, her various thought experiments are presented in order to support and help the reader identify situations in which the permissibility of abortion seems just. This essay will scrutinise the effectiveness of Thomson’s ideas, and whether they have led to a more definable understanding when defending abortion.…

    • 2736 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral," Don Marquis argues against the morality of abortion on the premise that the value of a fetus' future is so great that it is immoral to take that potential future away from it. Essentially, he contends, abortion is tantamount to murder: killing an individual is prima facie wrong because the loss of the goods of one's future is the worst loss a human can suffer. He calls this potential future a "future-like-ours," which is the basis for his contentions. In the next few pages I will delineate the general progression of his argument, and later, will evaluate the plausibility of said argument. Though Marquis makes both logical and compelling claims, there are several concerns and weaknesses that arise from his argument that must be considered.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Activisim: Abortion

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the reading “Julia ‘Butterfly’ Hill,” Stephen Browning talks about a young environmental activist who fought hard to save redwood forest trees. Julia Hill had an accident in August 1996, which almost got her killed. When that accident happened, Julia realized and said to herself “There’s got to be something more.” After that accident, Julia became a famous environmental activist. Julia Hill succeeded in saving one of redwood biggest trees “Luna” by living there for two years and eight days. Julia did not stop trying to protect the environment. In fact, she went to Ecuador to try and stop an oil pipeline company from cutting down trees, but she did not succeed.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the past quarter century, abortion has joined race and war as one of the most contentious subjects of controversy in the United States. It discusses human interaction where ethics, emotions, and law collaborate. Many have contemplated upon the meaning of abortion. One argument is that every child born should be wanted. The people in lieu of this theory are often referred to as Pro-choice activists. The opposing argument is that every child conceived should be born, this theory epitomized by Pro-life activists. A public consensus exists that when human personhood starts, that the law must protect person. Many religions, organizations, and individuals have fervently held conflicting beliefs about when this transpires. This naturally leads to differing policies on whether a woman should have access to abortion or not.…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson - Abortion

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the article ‘A Defense of Abortion’ Judith Jarvis Thomson provides an argument that abortion in some cases is morally permissible, because all persons have a right to life. Thomson defends the case by the premise that life begins at the moment of conception; therefore a fetus has the right to life. At the same point Thomson argues that women with unplanned pregnancies that occur from acts of rape have the right to decide what happens to their body. Yet Thomson suggests the unborn child’s right to life should outweigh the mother’s right to autonomy. As a result, the fetus may not be killed. According to Thomson an abortion should not be performed in any circumstance, unless the mother’s life is at risk. In that particular case Thomson grants the mother’s right to life to be greater than the fetus.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    defends that abortion is a morally sound action. Don Marquis, in his essay An Argument that Abortion is Wrong, takes the opposite stance. He claims “that abortion, except perhaps in rare instances, is seriously wrong”.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The topic of abortion has brought about a series of debates, controversy, and activism. People often choose a position when it comes to abortion based off of their values or beliefs. Not only do ones beliefs pertaining to morality, responsibility, and the role of the government in public policy affect one’s view on abortion, but so doe’s religion. In many people’s lives, religion plays the most importance when making decisions. Some religions discourage abortion which in turn heavily affects the debate on abortion’s legality. In the United States, those that are against abortion or for heavier restrictions refer to themselves as pro-life. Those that are against legal restrictions on abortion describe themselves as pro-choice. The issue of abortion tends to be complicated because some groups focus on the morality of abortion while other groups focus on the laws permitting or restricting abortion. The philosopher known as Mary Anne Warren gives an example of a possible view on abortion. In her case “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion,” she argues for the idea that abortion is morally acceptable. Mary Anne Warren’s argument also coincides with the Utilitarian idea of happiness.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The real question regarding all of the varying opinions and controversy, is what is a human embryo, and what is human life? Other questions include the morality of embryonic stem cell research and is bearing children a right given to us by society? Further discussion of these question will entail why in vitro fertilization has a wide range of ethical and moral consequences.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays