University of Alberta Department of Mathematical & Statistical Sciences Math 125 Lecture S1 - Linear Algebra I Winter 2013 Instructor: Christopher Marks Office: CAB 581 E-mail: chris.marks@ualberta.ca Office Hours: MWF 12:30-13:30‚ and by appointment ------------------------------------------------- Lecture Room & Time: TL B2‚ MWF 11:00-11:50 ------------------------------------------------- Course Web Page: E-Class (Moodle) - login with your CCID and password Course Description:
Premium Final examination Linear algebra Academic dishonesty
amount of resources to choose from‚ there are hundreds of trade books on hundreds on topics across all grade and reading levels. Although this may seem like a brilliant idea at first‚ there is currently a growing awareness of the truthfulness and misrepresentations within these trade books. They are all different containing different amounts and types of information‚ so how do we know what is really true or most important? Elementary teachers are required to use multiple informational for this reason‚
Premium
TABL1710 Contract law Contract- AGREEMENT concerning PROMISES between 2 or more parties LEGAL RIGHTS & OBLIGATIONS Elements for legally binding contract: Intention- must have evidence to INTEND to make legal contract ‘Subject to contract’ NOT in final form MASTERS V CAMERON (no contract until conditions met) Implied intention: Social (friends)‚ family‚ domestic‚ voluntary NO INTENTION BALFOUR V BALFOUR (husband & wife- no agreement) COHEN V COHEN WAKELING V RIPLEY (seriousness- big sacrifice)
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all‚ I would like to say thank you express to all the lecturers for the course of Master of Science (Construction Contract Management)‚ especially my supervisor – Encik Norazam Othman‚ for their guidance during the writing of this master project. Without their supervision and advice‚ this project could not be completed on time. Secondly‚ I would like to express my gratitude to my dearest parents and brother for their support and advice during these few months. Not
Premium Contract Common law
* IPAAC * Issues e.g. whether there was a breach of duty * Principles e.g. Breach if burden of harm was not great * Authorities e.g. Woods v Multi sport holdings ltd * Applications e.g. The burden of using helmets was significant * Conclusion e.g. there is no breach Law of Contract Terms of the contract * Express terms * Terms stated and agreed to by parties * In simple cases‚ terms stated in offer * Eg‚ $ reward for cat
Premium Contract Tort
Accountant liability law varies across states within the United States. Clearly‚ accountants are liable to their clients for any mistakes that they make within their realm of work. However‚ the liability becomes questionable when dealing with third parties. A company may have many affluent stakeholders relying on their financial statements in order to make important decisions‚ which may have monetary impacts. Therefore‚ an auditor’s precision is imperative. There have been many proposals in which
Premium Tort Accountant Audit
to obtain an expression of agreement. -Undue Influence: using a position of trust or authority to dominate another party. -Misrepresentation: untrue statement is one if fact or there is active concealment (PUFFERY). -The statement is material (and important fact) to the transaction. -The victim reasonably relied on the statement. -Fraud: misrepresentation plus: -Intent. -Cause injury. COMPETENT PARTIES Competent Parties: -Legal capacity to contract. -Contractual Capability:
Premium Contract
Case Study You arrange to meet your boyfriend at the Patio Hotel on Saturday night. Your best friend witnessed the two of you making the arrangement. It is to celebrate your birthday and you buy a new dress‚ shoes and accessories for the date. He does not turn up and does not text you with an explanation. Can you sue him? If so‚ why? If not‚ why not? She would be unable to sue him as this is a social agreement which is unenforceable by law. Neither party has entered into a legally binding
Premium Contract
Case 5.3 Assumption of the Risk: Lilya v. The Greater Gulf State Fair‚ Inc. o Strict Liability • Ch. 6: Strict Liability and Product Liability o Introduction to Strict Liability and Product Liability o Negligence and Misrepresentation o Strict Liability • Landmark Law: Restatement of Torts Definition of Strict Liability o Defective Product o Defect in Manufacture • Case 6.1 Defect in Manufacture Shoshone Coca-Cola
Premium Tort
A. Introduction Joe (“J”) is attempting to sue Dazzle Dry Cleaners (“D”) for compensation for the loss occurred due carelessness of D. D will defend itself likely by proving exclusion clause as a part of the terms of its contract with J. In order to advice J it necessary to determine whether the clause has a contractual effect. Secondly it is necessary to determine the terms of the contract and analyse if creation of such clause protects the party relying on it from the consequence of breach
Premium Contract Contract law