hampers the judicial process or it has overcome the rhetorical method of getting justice by court. Finally to understand the requirement of judicial accountability‚ does it violates constitution or it is incapability of politician who are judging the judges? INTRODUCTION India is a developing country and in a way of becoming a developed country and therefore it has to strengthen its resources‚ infrastructure and every other department to even become comparable with other
Premium Judge Separation of powers Law
CROATIA I. Historical Background Croatia first appeared as a duchy in the late 8th century and then as a kingdom in the 10th century. From the 12th century it remained a distinct state with its ruler (ban) and parliament‚ but it obeyed the kings and emperors of various neighboring powers‚ primarily Hungary and Austria. The period from the 15th to the 17th centuries was marked by bitter struggles with the Ottoman Empire. After being incorporated in Yugoslavia for most of the 20th century‚ Croatia
Premium Judge Police Sergeant
case to answer‚ but the learned trial Judge held that there was‚ and called on the accused to enter his defence; whereupon his counsel announced that the defence did not wish to call any witness. b. On the application by the defence‚ the judge in High Court referred the matter to Federal Court. The case was stated as a special case and remitted to Federal Court under sections 48 and 49 of the Courts of Judicature Act 7 of 1964 (Revised 1972)‚ Act 91. c. The judge in High Court had stated three questions
Premium United States Constitution Constitution Judge
11-11-11 By Huang Jie MOOT COURT TRAINING 1 HOW TO LAWYERING IN FRONT OF JURY AND JUDGES? 11-11-11 ¢ 1. Know your audience: age‚ gender‚ occupation‚ what will appeal to them‚ what will offend them‚ put yourself into your audience’s shoes to consider what they will want to hear ¢ 2. A strong opening statement: summarize the case in a compelling way 2 By Huang Jie CALDER V. JONES SIFT Law Jie Huang 3 ¢ 3. Have a theme: Simple‚ easy-to-understand‚ and
Premium Audience theory Audience Jury
trial‚ Céleste is called to testify about Meursault’s character. “He said‚ ‘The way I see it‚ it’s [the murder] bad luck is. It leaves you defenseless… He was about to go on‚ but the judge told him that that would be all and thanked him… he stated he had more to say” (Camus 89). When Céleste provides an answer that the judge does not deem appropriate‚ he is quickly asked to stop speaking. Society expects Céleste to condemn Meursault’s actions and try to seem as disconnected from him as possible. Camus
Premium Judge Prosecutor Franz Kafka
Judicial Affidavit Rule: Three reforms to speed up justice To speed up the delivery of justice‚ three significant reforms were instituted recently: (1) the “Judicial Affidavit Rule‚” (2) the filling up of all judicial vacancies‚ and (3) the stabilization of judicial compensation. Judicial affidavit. To ease case congestion and minimize delays in the trial courts‚ the Supreme Court promulgated on Sept. 4 (to take effect on Jan. 1‚ 2013) the Judicial Affidavit Rule. Under this new system sponsored
Premium Court Judge
brought to justice and it’s done all within one hour. Then there are civil court shows like Judge Judy and Judge Mathis‚ where you can see what actually happens in a court of law when someone is sued. All in all‚ when you watch these shows you never get the full effect of the roles each person in a courtroom plays to bring a person to justice. Some roles are more important than others‚ but people like Bailiffs‚ Judges or even Jurors all share an amount of responsibility in making sure that justice is served
Free Jury Judge Law
made by judges in trials (Precedents) Origin of Common Law: William the conqueror took power in England in 1066 Judges were sent out on circuits visiting villages and hearing cases From time to time‚ the judges would meet and discuss the cases they heard The idea of precedents developed Judges should be consistent when hearing similar cases; this is seen as just and fair. In the 14th Century 1. Another court was set up to hear people’s appeals who thought that their original judge had made
Premium Law Political philosophy Common law
India S. P. Bharucha‚ when he grieved over the rampant corruption in the higher judiciary and brought to notice that around 20 percent judges of the higher judiciary are corrupt. Now the question remains; can the judicial accountability be trusted upon any more? Does the judiciary hold the same value‚ as it had earlier? Is the judiciary abusing its freedom? Can judges be permitted to do anything in the guise of ‘independence’? These are the questions which still remained unanswered. Judicial Corruption
Premium Judge Judiciary Court
courtroom work and the rolls and responsibilities of each person. Courtroom Standards Analysis The Role of Judge The judge’s role in the justice system is complex. This is because there are a number of tasks that must be performed
Premium Law Judge Jury