Compare and contrast Durkheim‚ Weber and Marx within the structure-agency and conflict-consensus frameworks. Alexandra Jonsson Student number: 15010580 Tutorial timeslot: Tuesday‚ 9:30-10:20 Tutor: Ashleigh Sociology is based on two frameworks‚ namely structure-agency and conflict-consensus. These frameworks center around three founders of sociology‚ Emile Durkheim‚ Karl Marx and Max Weber. This essay will attempt to demonstrate which author explains sociology
Free Sociology
Contents Defining terms 2 Research topic 2 Application of research philosophies 2 Bibliography 4 Defining terms Positivism and interpretivism are epistemology research philosophies. They demonstrated the research in different ways to fit researcher’s research. Positivism advocates quantitative research data while interpretivism is qualitative. More academic saying ‚ Positivism works observable social reality rather than impressions‚ value-free in the process ‚ research product is law-like generalisation
Premium Research Scientific method Quantitative research
positivists‚ the occurrence of crime is explained by reference to forces and factors outside the decision making ability of the individual – a reason why often the classical and positivist theories are seen as being directly opposing. Biological positivism became popularised through the work of Cesare Lombroso‚ who attempted to explain criminal and deviant behaviour by differentiating different types of human individuals‚ and then to categorise them‚ based on their racial and biological differences
Premium Criminology Sociology Crime
and other people of everyday society‚ as horrid and unnecessary. Emile Durkheim believes that crime is normal and it isn’t possible for it to not exist. If crime is everywhere and in no area has crime ever been successfully eradicated then we should assume it is there for a reason. According to many books written by Emile Durkheim‚ such as Suicide‚ and The Division of Labor‚ society plays a large role in our actions and Durkheim explains that reasons to which why crime is executable. Experts in the
Premium Sociology
social theorists‚ Michel Foucault and Emile Durkheim. In the opinion of Foucault‚ he believes in using punishment as a political tactic. On the other hand‚ Durkheim believes punishment reaffirms the moral order. Comparing the two‚ the trend of supermax prisons for long-term solitary confinement is much better supported by Foucault than Durkheim. Foucault views this as an effective means of punishment towards those who broke the law. On the other hand‚ Durkheim would believe that long-term solitary confinement
Premium Prison Crime Penology
Nedum Aniemeka SOSC 12100 February 17th 2014 Collective Thought vs. Individual Thought: Discussing the Categories of Understanding When discussing the use of symbols in both Durkheim and Strauss’ works‚ it is important for us to look at how both thinkers talk about the categories of understanding. In Elementary Forms‚ Durkheim believes the categories of understanding are grounded in the social‚ using Australian totemism to explain how the primitive mind used symbols derived from collective thought
Premium Psychology Mind Human
Future of Modernization Paper * * As I analyzed the different modern theorists from Chapter 16‚ Social Change: Modern and Postmodern Societies‚ (Macionis. 2011) which are‚ “Ferdinand Tönnies: The Loss of Community‚ Emile Durkheim: The Division of Labor‚ Max Weber: Rationalization‚ and Karl Marx: Capitalism‚” and based upon the supplied information‚ I think the United States has manifested modernization in society through the theory described by “Emile Durkeim: The Division
Free Sociology
There are two sides to crime and deviance that help with the functioning of society. Firstly the positive side‚ this helped society change and remain dynamic. Durkheim believed a certain amount of crime was necessary for any society‚ (shared norms and values were important). This includes guiding our actions. There are three elements of the positive aspects‚ including reaffirming the boundaries; this re-affirms
Premium Sociology
individual selfishness would cause social disintegration. For functionalist‚ what makes order possible is value consensus – a set of shared norms and values for people to follow. Durkheim argues that religious institutions play a central part in creating and maintaining value consensus‚ order and solidarity. For Durkheim‚ the key feature of all religions is a fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane. The sacred are things set apart and forbidden‚ inspiring feelings of awe fear
Free Sociology
a phenomenon that contributes to social order. Throughout the book‚ he stresses on how the division of labor creates interdependence between and among individuals—which in turn fosters solidarity. Defining Social Solidarity Despite this‚ Durkheim did not give a direct and exact definition of social solidarity. He first labelled it as a complete moral phenomenon-- that is its occurrence conforms to the rules of right conduct (Random House Dictionary. Moral. (14‚ October 2010) Retrieved from
Premium Sociology Max Weber Karl Marx