Advanced Placement United States History Summer Assignment 2010 Paul Johnson and Howard Zinn are both famous historians whom are great and entertaining writers. Beside the facts that they see the beginning of America with different views. Howard is extremely honest about his radical bias while Paul Johnson believed that the world was well managed by a few superb individuals. Here are some of their points of views. Howard Zinn covers early Native American civilization in North America and the Bahamas
Premium United States Americas Indigenous peoples of the Americas
The “Bad History” of Howard Zinn and the Brainwashing of America By Mary Grabar America’s Survival‚ Inc. 443-964-8208 1 www.usasurvival.org CONTENTS I. II. III. IV. V. VI. A History That No Self-Respecting Marxist Historian Would Consider Reinventing the Wheel The History of the Scottsboro Case as Prelude Reshaping Humanity for Utopia For Kids: The Radical Historian as Super-Hero Zinn’s Real Scholarship 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Although Howard Zinn denied membership in the Communist
Premium United States History Howard Zinn
telling us that it is necessary to kill millions of people in war and it is necessary for billions of dollars to be spent on weapons. Not many people have questioned authority and plead for justice and if they had not very many of us have heard of it‚ Chapter 11 is ultimately about achieving justice without massive violence using dissent. P-1) Dissent is the ultimate power. P-2) Nonviolent direct action is an example of dissent. Therefore‚ nonviolent direct action is the ultimate power. The argument
Free Nonviolence Civil disobedience Martin Luther King, Jr.
What is Gordon S. Wood’s argument and what is Howard Zinn’s argument on the nature of the American War for Independence and what evidence do the two historians present to support their interpretations? Who do you think presents the better case? Howard Zinn Howard Zinn’s argument on the nature of the American War for Independence was the war for independence was not a social revolution. Instead‚ he argues the colonial elite used the war for their own personal gain in power and status. The wealthy
Premium United States Declaration of Independence American Revolution
1. In a nutshell‚ Professor Howard Zinn’s purpose for writing “A People’s History of the United States” was to offer a history of the United States (from the first settlers all the way to the mid1970’s at the time of publishing) that did not outright lie or “sugar coat” our country’s past. Furthermore‚ Zenn seeks to avoid manipulating our history as a means to calm the reader‚ albeit causing controversy when his book first debuted. Additionally‚ in the word’s of the author himself‚ “If history is to be creative
Premium Slavery Howard Zinn
Howard Zinn challenges the American identity by suggesting that America is just as bad as Great Britain in that the countries are both incredibly elitist. Going back to the founding fathers‚ the U.S. has an uneven distribution of wealth‚ and the founding fathers wanted to oppress the lower class. Once the lower class realized this‚ riots were held against the elites. Zinn argues that the American Revolution merely shifted the elite tyranny from one leader to another. The founding fathers that are
Premium United States Social class Working class
Zinn: Chapter 11 Courtney Sever Period 2 Chapter 11: Robber Barons and Rebels Main Ideas - Businessmen monopolized the markets (railroads and steel are two good examples) in exchange for “economic stability” to ensure that they had control over the full market. They would then change prices as they pleased to drive out their competition. - Many workers in the South organized strikes‚ asking for higher wages. Most of these workers were black or members of the Knights of Labor. These strikes were
Premium William Jennings Bryan Populist Party Populism
contact is the side of the story from the victims. H. These atrocities are absent in many texts because historians try to preserve morality and not let out all the immoral things that happened in America’s history. Zinn compares it to radioactive wastes being buried in containers. I. Zinn means that historians
Premium Native Americans in the United States United States Colonialism
Howard Zinn A Peoples History of the United States Chapter 1: Columbus‚ the Indians and Human Progress Can historians avoid emphasis on some facts and not others? Historians are selective‚ they simplify and they emphasize what they believe is important and gloss over other things they view as less important. “This distortion
Premium Slavery
southern states in return for the admission of the Mexican war territories (California‚ especially) into the Union as non-slave states. The Act made it easy for slaveowners to recapture ex-slaves or simply to pick up blacks they claimed had run away” (Zinn‚ A People’s History of the United States). This clearly portrays the government’s concern with national unity and power over slave emancipation. These actions also support Zinn’s assertion that "Such a government would never accept an end to slavery
Premium Slavery in the United States Slavery