BlackBerry v. Co-Founders After announcing open for purchase‚ BlackBerry has already agreed to a non-binding offer from Fairfax. Before the deadline (Nov.4) of Fairfax’s offer‚ BlackBerry can still accept higher offer from others‚ thus co-founders of BlackBerry‚ who own 8% shares of BlackBerry‚ are running a bid. Negotiation Environment Number of Parties: Two Parties. One is the rest 92% of BlackBerry’s shareholders (represented by the CEO and the board of BlackBerry). The other is a potential
Premium Stock market Stock Negotiation
Election of 1896 Why the election of 1896 is considered a watershed moment in American politics? The year of 1894 would transpire to be the highest of the populist influence; however that would only develop well-defined in remembrance. In the presidential election year of 1896‚ the split set up a fascinating political election season. The candidates of the 1896 election has a campaign that determines the course of politics for decades; one that is particularly unforgettable‚ or that develops into
Premium Great Depression United States Franklin D. Roosevelt
Bàitập 1 – Chương 1 HãyđọccácđoạntríchtrongbảnánvàxácđịnhcácnguồnluậtvàTòaánđãsửdụng Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Broderip v Salomon) Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 is a landmark1 UK company law case. The effect of the Lords ’ unanimous 2 ruling was to uphold 3firmly the doctrine4 of corporate personality‚ as set out in the Companies Act 1862‚ so that creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the company ’s shareholders
Premium Corporation
In Keighley‚ Maxted & Co v Durant (1901)‚ A was authorized by P to buy wheat at 44s 3d a quarter on a joint account for A and P. Wheat was unobtainable at this price and‚ therefore‚ A agreed to buy from T at 44s 6d a quarter. Though he intended to buy it on behalf of himself and P‚ A contracted in his own name and did not disclose the agency to T. The next day P ratified the purchase at the unauthorized price but‚ in due course‚ P and A failed to take delivery. It was held by the House of Lords
Premium Appeal Contract
James Leamon Johnson & Wales University Law 2001 Professor Bertron 01 Feb 2014 Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinez Briefly explain the opinion. Which of Martinez’s claims were successful and which were not? Why (what was the court’s legal explanation)? In this case‚ Martinez brought forward three claims. First‚ he claimed strict product liability based on defective design of the tire. Martinez also claimed negligence and gross negligence. In their ruling‚ the jury found that the defective design
Premium Jury Tort Law
referred to as the “Lochner Era”‚ the Supreme Court of the United States protected businesses by rejecting State-regulated economic regulations (Choudhry 2004‚ 6). This precedent was revisited in the 1937 landmark Supreme Court Case‚ West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish‚ which involved‚ Elsie Parrish‚ a chambermaid at the West Coast Hotel‚ who sued the Cascadian Hotel (owned by the West Coast Hotel Company‚) for not having been paid the legal minimum wage (West’s Encyclopedia of American Law). In 1932‚ a
Premium Employment United States Supreme Court of the United States
dividing line between historical periods. The election of 1896 was just that. The depression of the 1890s‚ and President Cleveland’s unwillingness to use federal resources to assist the unemployed‚ alienated irate farmers and workers from the Democratic Party. During the 1892 and 1894 elections‚ Democrats suffered large Congressional seat losses while Republicans and Populists each achieved significant gains. As the presidential election of 1896 drew closer and political leaders worked to define party
Premium President of the United States United States Elections
The Long Depression 1873-1878/1896 & Its Similarities to Today’s Great Recession It is often said‚ “That those who do not study the history of the past are doomed to repeat its mistakes‚” This is of particular interest in examining the causes‚ the issues themselves‚ social reform‚ greed‚ credit‚ high unemployment‚ the labor movement‚ technological growth‚ immigration‚ corruption‚ capital and tax issues along with a multitude of other conditions experienced during the Long Depression of 1873-1878
Free Great Depression Unemployment Business cycle
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.‚ 05-1074 Summary of one or more of the main legal arguments: It seems this class has made me realize how tricky the justice system can be. I have been coaxed into reading more and more about the law and realizing that everything is not as black and white as it seems. For this legal research paper I decided to analyze the law concerning pay discrimination. This is a subject dear to my heart‚ as I believe I witnessed some of this first hand in relation to
Premium Discrimination Supreme Court of the United States
principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.” In Bowles v. Virginia Soapstone Co.‚ the judge ruled: “expert testimony is a useful and necessary adjunct to the administration of justice‚ and a capable expert can often throw much light upon dark places; but the force of expert testimony must‚ after all‚ in large measure depend upon the reasons that the witness is able to give for the opinions which he expresses.” In Bird v. Commonwealth‚ the court found: "All persons who practice a business
Premium Law Jury Evidence law