Preview

Why Are Likert's Participative Mangement Style and Blake and Moutons Managerial Grid the Key Aspects of Human Relations Approach

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
781 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Are Likert's Participative Mangement Style and Blake and Moutons Managerial Grid the Key Aspects of Human Relations Approach
zenith university college | MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT | | LEVE 400, SEMESTER ONE | 2/23/2013 |

Carefully analyze Likert’s Participative Management style and Blake and Mouton’s Grid, bringing out why the two were key aspects of the Human Relations approach |

LIKERT’S PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT STYLE
Likert outlined four systems of management to describe the relationship, involvement and roles of managers and subordinates in industrial settings. The management systems he outlined include Exploitative Authoritative, Benevolent Authoritative, Consultative System and Participative system. The management systems mentioned is briefly explained as follows;
Exploitative authoritative: In this system, managers tend to use threats, fear and punishment to motivate their workers. Managers at the top of the hierarchy make all the decisions and motivation is characterized by threats.
Benevolent authoritative: Under this system, motivation is based on the potential for punishment and partially on rewards. The decision making arena is expanded by allowing the lower level employees to be involved in policy making but major policy decisions are left to those at the top, who have some awareness of the problems that occur at the lower levels.
Consultative system: This theory is very close to the human relations theory. Motivation of workers is gained through rewards, occasional punishments, and very little involvement in decision making and goals.
Participative system: Likert argued that this was the most effective form of management. The system promotes genuine participation in decision making and setting goals through free-flowing horizontal communication and tapping into the creativity and skills of workers.
Extensive research conducted as early as the 1950s and 1960s demonstrated that participative management is particularly well suited to science-based organizations whose key staff are noted for their creativity, intrinsic motivation for



References: Modaff, D.P., Butler, J.A. DeWine, S. (2008). Organizational communication: Foundations, Challenges and Misunderstandings (Third edition) Hall, J.W. (1972), A Comparison of Halpin and Croft’s Organizational Climates and Likert and Likert’s Organizational Systems. Rensis Likert: Management Systems and Styles (2011) Blake, R.; Mouton, J. (1964). The Managerial Grid: The Key to Leadership Excellence Blake, R; Mouton, J. (1985). The Managerial Grid III: The key to Leadership Excellence

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Busi 310 Db 2

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    DISCUSSION: As stated before, Coercive Power is “A form of influence through which the employee obeys, but only because of the presence of threats” (Satterlee, 2009, p. 111). Essentially, a boss could use his or her power to pressure employees to do their work. A boss may force an employee to perform by threatening to use that power against them. A boss could bring up threats such as the possibility of firing the employees or even docking them pay. The article I chose, “The intersection of power, trust and supplier network size: implications for supplier performance,” by Bryan Ashenbaum and Regis Terpend (2012), evaluates the statistics involved when bosses utilize the…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Form of Power Unit 7

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Coercive Power I have seen used before in a larger company were you felt like a number because of the type of power. You had your chain of command if you were down at the bottom of the pole like a new hire it was very confusing at time, because you would have multiple bosses that sometimes felt they had the power. You would have one boss tell you what to do and another boss tells you another thing. Coercive Power management when used right can be effective, but if used wrong can be little an employee. If used right it gets everyone going in the right direction and keeps them on the right track. Legitimate power is when someone in authority complies with orders given to them because they believe that the position or title that the person holds gives him the right to use that power. I see this type of…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The commonality of these four (4) systems is evident, they are all management systems put into place by organizations to increase production, or meet their organizational goals; the difference between these systems may or may not be as obvious. Each has its own set of ideals, and direct their attention to specific areas within their organization based on the system of management used. Sociotechnical and organizational techniques lean more toward the personnel within a business and their happiness or willingness to work together, a…

    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tanglewood Case Study 1

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The organization has a tiered hierarchy with multiple levels of management reporting upward while maintaining a participatory management style even down to the departmental managers having the ability to create methods for running the department.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper I will examine the roles and responsibilities of authoritative managers and leaders in advancement and creating an advantageous authoritative ability in a company. I will additionally differentiate amid administration and administration aural an aggregation as able-bodied as call the roles in which both managers and leaders comedy in creating and advancement an advantageous authoritative ability in a company. I will go on to explain how the arch action of administration supports the conception and aliment of an advantageous authoritative ability in a company. Finally, I will achieve with my recommendations that both managers and leaders can use to actualize and advance an advantageous authoritative ability in a company.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | According to Likert's management continuum, what system would a manager be following if he/she openly placed confidence and trust in his/her subordinates while controlling them through negotiation and communication?…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Reward – This results from one person's ability to compensate another for compliance. Identifying and looking up to a powerful person that motivates people to conform to their wishes.…

    • 4641 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Micro Exam Study Guide

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    - Upward influence – managing the boss (like in the soul of a new machine)…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    7 Bases of Power

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (1) COERCIVE POWER: This stems from the subordinates' perception that the supervisor clearly has the ability to enforce policies and procedures. This power is derived from the principle that there will be consequences if unacceptable subordinate behavior continues.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mostly nursing managers and leaders have positional power, however one person can have more than one kind of power. For example a leader has positional power, charismatic, personal, and expert power, if that leader has qualification.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A classic example of the power of authoritative factors is provided by Stanley Milgram 's study on obedience to authority. College students from Yale University were asked to participate in an experiment to test the effects of punishment on learning. They were willing to continue…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since organizations can be viewed as systems, management can also be defined as human action, including design, to facilitate the production of useful outcomes from a system. This view opens the opportunity to 'manage ' oneself, a pre-requisite to attempting to manage others.…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because organizations can be viewed as systems, management can also be defined as human action, including design, to facilitate the production of useful outcomes from a system. This view opens the opportunity to 'manage ' oneself, a pre-requisite to attempting to manage others.…

    • 8532 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    MODELS OF OB

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3) The supportive model: the supportive model depends on leadership instead of power or money. Through leadership, management provides a climate to help employees grow and accomplish in the interests of the organization, the things of which they are capable. The custodial approach leads to employee dependence on the organization rather than their boss. Employees depend on organizations for their security and welfare. The custodial model emphasizes economic rewards, securities. The productivity is lower under this theory as compared to that under autocratic theory in spite of the fact that employees are happy.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within the following essay, the three main Strategic approaches in Human Resource Management will be named and explained. Due to its complexity giving a detailed definition of HRM would significantly extend the report. Instead, a rather shallower one by D. Torrington, L. Hall and S. Taylor in the seventh edition of their Human Resource Management (2008): They state that “On the one hand it is used generically to describe the body of management activities” and continue that; “Used in this way HRM is really no more than a more modern and supposedly imposing name for what has long been labelled ‘personnel management’.”. They finally argue that; “On the other hand, the term is equally widely used to denote a particular approach to the management of people which is clearly distinct from ‘personnel management’. Used in this way ‘HRM’ signifies more than an updating of the label; it also suggests a distinctive philosophy towards carrying out people-orientated organizational activities”.…

    • 2214 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics