Preview

Untrustworthy Wikipedia Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
115 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Untrustworthy Wikipedia Research Paper
Untrustworthy Wikipedia Wikipedia is known as an unreliable site due to numerous amount of editorial adjustments on each article by unknown editors that may contain errors. The articles should not be used to make critical decisions, because you don’t know who wrote the information, and the source of the data could be false. Individuals can create malicious entries, and people with agendas have significant editing authority which make the site untrustworthy. It’s a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. It lacks reputable sources, the information might seem credible, and may contain many errors. The information on the site is often outdated, and post are made by someone that is not an expert in the field.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apa Research and Bibliography Activity Essay Example
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Apa Research and Bibliography Activity Essay Example

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis Of John Seigenthaler's Essay
    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Rhetorical Analysis Of John Seigenthaler's Essay

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Do Slavery (27 BCE-200 CE)?
    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Do Slavery (27 BCE-200 CE)?

    I think the writer of this piece wrote it because they wanted to make a nice website to help people. I think I can trust this website.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theodore Roosevelt: Progressive Crusader Analysis
    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Theodore Roosevelt: Progressive Crusader Analysis

    Although the pros outweigh the cons on this website, there are some things that aren’t as favorable. For example, the article is rather long for someone who is not interested in an in depth reading of the topic. It’s also just words about the topic. It’s not too fun how some articles can be with pictures or other illustrations. Some people are more visual learners rather than just reading words.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gen499 week 2 assignment 1
    • 255 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gen499 week 2 assignment 1

    The main concerns I have while conducting research, is knowing if the information is accurate for one, and does it really help me in my writing. With sites like Wikipedia, you have to assume they are not the only sites of their nature. While a lot of their information is correct, it may not be accurate or properly cited or documented. Others have to be doing the same thing, like urban dictionary among others. It makes me nervous unless I am on a .org or .gov website. Knowing if the information is truly helping my case, instead of hurting me is the other concern. Things can be taken out of context very easily, and either I, or the reader could mis-understand where I was going with something.…

    • 255 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales
    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jimmy wales

    Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531
    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ldr/531

    Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia; providing facts, advice, and opinions from one or more contributors. Although it provides users with a vast amount of information there is often no citation for the facts, which does not allow the reader to confirm the credibility of the record. The mere fact that anyone can manipulate the content submitted allows some readers to challenge the website information as biased or fabricated. Credentials are an important aspect of research; providing information only on topics in which they publish on their website.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Wikipedia
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Wikipedia

    Wikipedia does not have an apocalyptic view about this because its core audience knows the site very well and it has all the necessary experience to get exactly what they want. The loyal users use internal searches or they head directly to the page they want to see. This somehow works like in the case of the top affiliate networks. People know what they want and where they should go to find it.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Inf 103

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Perfectly Flawed Research Paper
    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Perfectly Flawed Research Paper

    There’s a freshman in one of my classes who always wears thick, dark eyeliner and other excessive makeup. For a couple of days the other week, she stopped. The first time I saw her without makeup, it was weird; I had never seen her without it before. A few days later, she came back with eyeliner and a fresh layer of foundation on her face. I remembered the face I saw just the day before; even though the makeup was pretty, she was pretty without all the extra effects. That same day during class she told me about how there was a guy snapchatting her. They made a bet that she wouldn’t be able to go without makeup for two days. She continued to tell me how that morning, she put on her makeup and sent him a snapchat. He responded…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Philip Lau's Essay The Limitations Of Wikipedia
    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Philip Lau's Essay The Limitations Of Wikipedia

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia
    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia

    In Mark Wilson’s article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”, Wilson argues that despite the legitimacy of Wikipedia, educators should engage and take part in helping shape the direction of Wikipedia. In a test published in the journal “Nature”, articles in Wikipedia are said to be as revered as those in the “Encyclopedia Britannica.” Since the perceived lack of academic authority, Wilson suggests that those with research specialties should enroll as editors of Wikipedia to add, control, and learn from the information being provided. Wilson describes his own interaction with Wikipedia and how he, his students, and other colleagues have benefitted from the use of it. From becoming a Wikipedia editor and a collaborator with other colleagues, Wilson has “in turn taught some people how to properly reference ideas and information.” Wilson expresses his ideas to involve scholars with Wikipedia to make it more useful to students and the public. Wilson argues that Wikipedia is a source that although warned from, students will go to anyway to start projects, look up terms, and go for general information. If Wikipedia is “the largest coherent store of information and ideas” as stated by Wilson, then “teacher and scholars should have been on this train years ago for the benefit of our students and professions.”…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Credible Source Credibility
    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Is Credible Source Credibility

    Today in society, source credibility is becoming a bigger issue. Many people and students now a days find themselves in a predicament where credible sources are needed to help with research projects, essays, books etc. The internet is a big place and is filled with insane amounts of information for societies reach. The question is whether these sources are credible sources or just information filled in by average person with little experience or knowledge in the subject.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Credible/Non Credible Sources
    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Credible/Non Credible Sources

    Each person has their opinion on what they feel about the credibility and reliability of Wikipedia. Some believed that Wikipedia is not a reliable source because anyone can create an account and update information whereas others may think that to be a positive aspect. They feel because anyone can create an account, this gives the opportunity for groups to come together (especially those that are very knowledgeable) and this in turn will develop a common resource of knowledge to be credible. Some will argue that Wikipedia is not reliable because it is not peered reviewed, but then some would say that Wikipedia is backed up with references at the end of the page which links to reliable information. There is an agreement between both sides that Wikipedia can be used as a quick informational page to gain some insight…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Website Credibility
    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Website Credibility

    Gathering information for academic purposes is very different nowadays. We not only have libraries to do research, we now have the Internet. There are numerous sources we can gather information from while searching the Internet, but we have to be careful in choosing a site that has credibility. A credible website is one that will have verifiable facts and credible editors who approve the validity of the facts (also known as gatekeepers); whereas, a non-credible website will have something or lack of something that will make you question its credibility. A non-credible website will also have questionable sources.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics