Preview

Pros And Cons Of Wikipedia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
491 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Wikipedia
The signals are clear: Google started sending less traffic to Wikipedia than it had a few months ago. While Wikipedia’s representatives aren’t very concerned about this phenomenon, the top affiliate networks are not too relaxed about what’s happening. In the last six months, the organic traffic from Google to Wikipedia had declined a massive 40%! Because the difference was hard to ignore, there were plenty of SEO experts who thought that the site had been hit by a Panda penalty (Read more about how Google Panda can affect your affiliate site - http://blog.revenuegiants.com/marketing/can-google-panda-affect-your-affiliate-site/)
Google, Wikipedia and the top affiliate networks
In just three months, Wikipedia received 250 million fewer visitors compared to the same time last year. The officials of the free encyclopedia know about this, but they are not at
…show more content…
SEO and Wikipedia
Wikipedia does not have an apocalyptic view about this because its core audience knows the site very well and it has all the necessary experience to get exactly what they want. The loyal users use internal searches or they head directly to the page they want to see. This somehow works like in the case of the top affiliate networks. People know what they want and where they should go to find it.
In the case of the casual users, they get what they need from Google and follow up with a click to a page if they want more information about the topic they’re interested in. And it seems that Wikipedia is not very interested in these kind of searches, that’s why it’s treating the traffic losses very lightly. After all, Wikipedia is a huge brand on its own and has built its reputation without relying on the help of search engines.
The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is made more appealing by introducing shortcuts. These shortcuts enable people to grasp a short summary of the article, without wasting time by reading the entire text. The advancement of the Internet is comparable to Frederick Winslow Taylor’s model, which broke down jobs into smaller steps to maximize efficiency. Taylor’s ethic is prominent on the Internet, and tries to establish the single most efficient method to carry out “knowledge work”. Taylor’s concept of breaking down tasks is exactly what Google is doing by systemizing everything for the intellectual mind. This goal is evident in Google’s attempt to make vast quantities of information, accessible at a quicker rate, in order to increase the productivity. Google aims to turn their general search engine into an artificial intelligence, which is comparable to HAL from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. They hope to do this, because they believe that if a person has all the world’s information attached to his or her brain, the person would have the capacity to be more productive. The idea of being replaced by artificial intelligence is unsettling, because the human brain is so imperfect, yet a computer can be adapted to meet these…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his article: Is Google Making Us Stupid, the author Nicholas Carr describes how Internet searching influences he and his friends. He states that he became to lose “concentration” on books and long-articles. Therefore, he raises a view that we need to care about the Web information, although it makes human life more convenient. He wrote: “The Web [had] been a godsend to me as a writer. Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes” (Para.3). Obviously, the Internet searching technologies, for instance, Google, it really helps us save times. The Internet searching technology makes human life more convenient and make office works and school paper works more efficient.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Google makes it easier to find the information you need instead of looking for it for hours. Although google makes it easier to find the information a person needs, the person does not actually obtain the information. Carr makes a good point saying “My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles.” (Carr) it shows a person can read something but not actually learn it. Google is a good resource, but because of it we do not actually learn the information we need.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A writer for Wired, a technology focused magazine and website, even states, “Net neutrality is a dead man walking. The execution date isn’t set, but it could be days, or months (at best)” (Ammori). This is assumed quite a bit in part because the court systems that struck down the original FCC rules seems to be heavily in favor of corporations over the public interest. It also doesn’t help that ISPs are currently offering a false compromise with the FCC. The current rules that the FCC is voting on would allow the FCC to tell ISPs that they are not allowed to block sites entire for no reason, but they would be allowed to throttle any website for any reason of their choosing. This is very worrying, because as Marvin Ammori put it, “Once the court voids the nondiscrimination rule, AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast will be able to deliver some sites and services more quickly and reliably than others for any reason. Whim. Envy. Ignorance. Competition. Vengeance. Whatever. Or, no reason at all.” If our internet is controlled by the decisions of corporations we are in for a bleak future. Websites like Wikipedia, which provide a wealth of free information, would have trouble being able to provide their services to the public for free as they would be facing a set of fees assessed by each ISP based off of the amount of users that access their website. Free sites that share information with people…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is one of the most sought out information website. Jimmy Wales, founder says this about his website, “Wikipedia is something special…, it is a place we can all go to think, to learn and share our knowledge with others” (Wikipedia, 2012, p1). This resourceful tool has up-to-date news, press releases, and it provides its users with the convenience to various languages. In this paper team C will debate on supporting arguments for Wikipedia and opposing arguments if it is credible and a valid source of information.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rector, Lucy Holman. (2008). Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles, Reference Services Review, Vol. 36 Iss: 1, pp.7 - 22. Retrieved December 19, 2010, from the World Wide Web:…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia can be beneficial to the academic student as well as the general researching public. Wikipedia covers an immense variety of topics that is continually maintained and updated, relevant, and non-biased in its presentation of information. Wikipedia possess all the qualities a reliable source would have. Wikipedia’s premise is promoting involvement of the general public for inputting information and continually adding into a comprehensive knowledge base.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, just because it has a lot of information doesn’t mean that it is all good information. Academic writing is a very accurate type of writing that can require many unbiased, reliable, credible, and relevant sources. I do not think all Wikipedia articles are held to these standards and so, I do not believe Wikipedia is an acceptable source for academic writing. Wikipedia is largely supposed to be an unbiased source by their own standards. However, not all articles are monitored enough to keep people’s biases from sticking through their writing.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons Wikapedia should be more censored is that Wikapedia sometimes post false information on their website. This occurs because anybody can post forums and other opinions on the website which is not checked to make sure that they are true. This makes it extremely difficult for high school and college students to research accurate information, which can effect themselves academically. This is also a problem for the public in general because there…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays