Preview

Apa Research and Bibliography Activity Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Apa Research and Bibliography Activity Essay Example
APA Research and Bibliography Activity

Part One: Assessing the RELIABILITY and Validity of Sources

IN THE SPACE PROVIDED IN COLUMNS TWO AND THREE OF THE FOLLOWING MATRIX, PREPARE A 50-100-WORD EVALUATION OF BOTH THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF EACH OF THE SOURCES LISTED IN COLUMN ONE.
|Source |Reliability |Validity |
|Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |
| |information can be added and changed by anyone. Many of the sources are not |be misleading. The web site is clear on the information but not necessarily accurate |
| |cited accurately or it only contains one source instead of multiple for the |because anyone with internet connection can modify the page, which may cause problem |
| |amount of information given on the paper. At time the sources given have |if someone is bias on some of the information provided in Wikipedia and decide to |
| |nothing to do with the research information written on the page. |change the information to fit their opinion. |
|American Psychological |The APA (American Psychological Association) is a reliable source. It contains |The APA (American Psychological Association) contains validity information. In order |
|Association Web Site |information written by many different scientists, psychologist and more. The |for information to be posted on the site author have to demonstrate credibility to |
| |website contains many copyrights and trademark. The website demonstrates that |their research. As
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    tma03 part analysis
    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    tma03 part analysis

    Yes the sources are reliable since it is an analysis based on some concrete facts.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robert Jones Case Study
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robert Jones Case Study

    Utilize at least two peer-reviewed articles that were published within the past five years from the Ashford University Library. Your paper and sources must use APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis Of John Seigenthaler's Essay
    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Rhetorical Analysis Of John Seigenthaler's Essay

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Untrustworthy Wikipedia Research Paper
    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page

    Untrustworthy Wikipedia Research Paper

    It’s a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. It lacks reputable sources, the information might seem credible, and may contain many errors. The information on the site is often outdated, and post are made by someone that is not an expert in the field.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Philip Lau's Essay The Limitations Of Wikipedia
    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Philip Lau's Essay The Limitations Of Wikipedia

    The writer wrote this essay to warn fellow college students the dangers of using Wikipedia as an academic research source. No student wants to go through hours of studying and research for a paper and end up using incorrect information. Knowing this, the writer starts by discrediting Wikipedia…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia
    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia

    In this article Wilson reaches out to fellow scholars to part take in improving Wikipedia for the better good of academics. Knowing that Wikipedia is not considered a legitimate source of information, he provides a logical solution to persuade educators, with facts, logic, and personal experience. I feel that Wilson was effective in conveying his message to his peers.…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Wikipedia A Valid Academic Source?
    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is Wikipedia A Valid Academic Source?

    It was interesting to learn their findings in which they found “eight serious errors” in which four came for Wikipedia and four came from Britannica. They also found 162 factual and misleading errors in Wikipedia while only finding 123 in Britannica. Articles chosen for the study varied in subject and were review by field experts; they were not told who wrote the articles. Wales founder of Wikipedia was asked what he thought of these findings and he was pleased with the findings and stated that the “error rate for each encyclopedia was not insignificant, and added that he thinks such numbers demonstrate that broad review of encyclopedia articles is needed” (Terdiman, 2005). The importance of this article was to show that even in a controlled setting there is room for error.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia Is Not A Reliable Source
    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wikipedia Is Not A Reliable Source

    This information could weaken this article as a potential source as some of the information is very off topic…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Wikipedia a Credible and Valid Source of Information?
    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is Wikipedia a Credible and Valid Source of Information?

    Team A debated on whether Wikipedia is a credible and valid source of information. The team was divided into two groups, one side for and one side against. Among the five team members only one (the author) sided for Wikipedia as a credible and valid source. The debate lasted for seven days. Great points were raised by each team members to prove what they sided for.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Wikipedia Inaccurate?
    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is Wikipedia Inaccurate?

    Centuries have passed, whereas man has sought a means to share their stories, some were factual whereas others were simply factually based. In either case, the methods used throughout the years have transformed from cave drawings into endless amounts of data unified through the internet. Taking advantage of technological advances, Wikipedia has arguably become the predominant source for providing information across the globe. However, its success is completely based on its users to add and edit all data presented. Controversially, the information does not go through any real vetting process before worldly presentation, therefor worth no more than cave drawings or old wives’ tales.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Gay Rights and the Social Conflict Theory
    • 2657 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Gay Rights and the Social Conflict Theory

    for the year 1974: Minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of Representatives. American Psychologist, 30, 620 – 651.…

    • 2657 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Clandestine Cultures
    • 8031 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Clandestine Cultures

    A Wikipedia article, or entry, is a page that has encyclopedic information on it. A well-written encyclopedia article identifies a notable encyclopedic topic, summarizes that topic comprehensively, contains references to reliable sources, and links to other related topics. Most articles consist of paragraphs and images, but they may also be formatted as stand-alone lists or tables. These lists or tables are also considered articles for Wikipedia's purposes.…

    • 8031 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Credibility of Wikipedia
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Credibility of Wikipedia

    One of the most popular websites is Wikipedia. Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia, was established in 2001. “It is now one of the largest sites on the web” (2007, Carleton College). The difference between Wikipedia and an encyclopedia is Wikipedia is a collaborative effort with articles written by individuals around the world using wiki software that allows content to be added or changed by anyone. All material can be edited. The issue with this method is the authors of the articles may not be experts on the topics they are writing, leaving a lot of room for error and bias. According to the founder, Jimmy Wales, “Wikipedia may not be a suitable source for academic uses”. He also states, “It is good enough knowledge, depending on what your purpose is” (2007, Carleton College.) This displays evidence that Wikipedia may not be credible because there is a lack of…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Effect of Caffeine Consumption on Academic Performance in College Undergraduates
    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Effect of Caffeine Consumption on Academic Performance in College Undergraduates

    References: American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Verble & Non Verble Communication
    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Verble & Non Verble Communication

    |Uses a wide range of information drawn from other sources (journals, articles, etc) to address |…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More