The Case of the Shipwrecked Sailors- Prosecution

Topics: Murder, Law, Capital punishment Pages: 1 (398 words) Published: February 6, 2006
In the "case of the shipwrecked sailors", three men were marooned after the sinking of an oil tanker. Subject to extreme conditions and starvation, the men drew lots after about twenty five days and decided that the loser would be killed and eaten as food. When one of the men lost the draw, he pulled out his consent, and the other two men killed him anyway, eating him. Five days later, the remaining two men were rescued and ensuing actions incurred their murder charges. This seems to be a simple case over the battle of life and death, and it truly is. The two men, Dudley and Stephens, made a conscious decision to commit not only the crime of murder, but the atrocity of cannibalism. Crime is crime and law is law- when breaks a law and commits a crime, a punishment must ensue.

First of all, the actions committed by Dudley and Stephens were quite obviously illegal. Though not on the mainland, this court's jurisdiction falls in the area of the crime at hand. Laws are still laws in our waters. Secondly, the men decided to kill Brooks with the justification that he "was going to die soon anyway" and they should "get it over with". This type of euthanasia was completely unjustified, based on the fact that Brooks rejected the idea of having the men kill and eat him when his lot was drawn. Though Brooks may have been on his death bed, Dudley and Stephens committed murder by taking his life. Also, the discussion of drawing the lots was in no way contractual, thus making in no way a binding agreement on the obscene act.

On all accounts, this crime is simply wrong and illegal. The morality and legality in "thou shall not kill" is a tenet that all citizens must abide, no matter the circumstances or personal beliefs of the individual. Though the situation of the men was tragic and stressful, a crime was committed and a man is dead. Brooks' life was deliberately taken by Dudley and Stephens, which signifies the punishable crime of murder. I recommend, pending a guilty...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on shipwrecked sailor case

    ...Shipwrecked Sailor Case Opening Statement May it please the court, your Honor, Counsel, my name is Corinne Newbern, counsel for-the prosecution in this action. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, it is my intent to prove to you that during that fateful night in the Atlantic Ocean, Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens selfishly and cowardly stole the life of Mr. Brooks and proceeded to eat him because they valued their own lives over that of a fellow crewmate. Mr. Brooks, Mr. Stephens, and Mr. Dudley were all crew members on a ship crossing the Atlantic Ocean. They would never reach their destination though. Halfway through their journey a horrible storm struck and caused the ship to sink. Mr. Brooks and his fellow survivors, Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens, were all stranded on a small life boat with no food, completely at the mercy of God. Mr. Stephens estimated they could only last 25 days without food. So day in and day out they sat on this lifeboat, waiting for a ship to come. Eventually Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens grew desperate. The facts will show that exactly 5 days before they were rescued by a passing ship, Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens killed and engaged in a ruthless act of cannibalism by eating Mr. Brooks in an attempt to prolong their survival. Witnesses will provide evidence to show that the remains of Mr. Brooks were found inside the stomach of the accused. Mr. Dudley and Mr. Stephens also confessed when questioned...

    Read More
    685 Words 3 Pages
  • Regina V Dudley and Stephen: Case of the Shipwrenched Sailor Essay

    ...Good Afternoon, Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury. When the judge read the indictment to you in the beginning of the case, you all had some pretty strong feelings. That’s understandable murder is a serious crime. It’s very unfortunate that a life had to be lost, but I’m here to tell you Dudley and Stephens should not be prosecuted or charged for the murder of Richard Parker. Dudley and Stephens are the victims of a failed government. Their acts were an act of survival, when all other alternative were tried. We must ask ourselves why we owe allegiance to our government in the first place. The very reason given by Thomas Hobbes is the social contract, the agreement between the people and their government by which the government protects and promotes the interests of the people, receiving loyalty and support from the people in return. Where was the government when the four seamen were lost at sea? The government failed to find these men and protect their lives and liberties. These men knew without government state of nature was inevitable, total chaos, and disorder. This is why these men had to create their own government. For clarification there are certain things that are not in dispute. Richard Parker was killed by Dudley and Stephens. Dudley, Stephens and Brooks participated in consuming Richard Parker’s dead body. These men consented with pulling a straw to nominate a sacrificial victim. Which Parker lost and later reneged on the agreements. These...

    Read More
    737 Words 3 Pages
  • Prosecution Essay

    ... Prosecution The prosecution used many forms of communication in order to convey their case to the jury. They used verbal communications of course when they made opening and closing statements, questioned witnesses before and during the trial, had objections, and when they put their case together. Before they went to trial they had to use multiple means of communication to gather evidence to present to the jury. They had to speak to the police investigators to even know if there was a case to try, and then they had to speak with investigators in order to gather all the evidence necessary to go to trial. They also had to get police reports, witness statements, and warrants to proceed further in the case. This was a form of written communication that was utilized by the prosecution. Once there was a case to prosecute, the prosecution had various legal documents to peruse through to make their case against the defense. Some of the legal documents included police reports, warrants, witness statements, and statements made by the defendant. There are also records of police interviews with Casey Anthony, both written and tape recorded. There are also written transcripts of recorded jail conversations between Casey and her family. The prosecution must also prepare its witnesses for the stand and the defenses...

    Read More
    272 Words 1 Pages
  • "Of Mice And Men"

    ...Looking at the gaps and silences in the novel written by john Steinbeck, we realise that George was responsible for Lennie's Death. This court case occurs after the end of the book, as a possibility of what George's outcome would have been. I took the side of the prosecution. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, in opening, I told you that we would prove that Mr. George Milton is guilty for the murder of Mr. Lennie Small. We have verified this - from disproving the credibility of Mr. Milton's testimony, by Candy Stone and Slim Burring's statements and by understanding the horrific way in which Mr. Milton constructed and executed the murder of Mr. Small. Jurors, when Mr. Toldson made his opening statement, he promised to prove to you three things. Just four hours ago, he told you that he would prove (1) that Mr. Milton was not entirely responsible for the murder of Mr. Small.; (2) that Mr. Milton was only acting in the best interest Lennie; and (3) that Lennie was simply a danger to society. As you have witnessed today, Mr. Toldson has not kept his word to you. Not only have these points been discredited, but disproved beyond reasonable doubt. Through both statements given to you today by hardworking labourers, it is evident that George wanted Lennie dead. It couldn't have been anymore obvious when Slim Burring friend to George, confessed to George saying, I quote "[Got him] Right in the back of the head...I just done it" Did Mr. Milton have the...

    Read More
    891 Words 3 Pages
  • Case Essay

    ...registered at the Ministry of Justice practice (particularly in Vietnams Ministry of Finance). Socially independent auditors have no common interests, no relationship with the audited firm. The work of independent external auditor Check the legality and validity of the documents, accounting data, the execution of policies, accounting practices, financial statement. Check and confirm the level of honesty and reasonableness of the financial statement by the accounting units created. Check and confirm the value of the equity of the joint venture parties, shareholders, verify the truthfulness, accuracy and completeness of the accounting data and financial statement of joint venture, dissolution, merger, split, equitization, bankruptcy and other cases prescribed by law. Assess finance , accounting and consulting services to financial management, accounting and tax at the request of customers The role of independent external auditor Financial statements are used for a variety of purposes and decisions. For example, financial statements are used by owners to evaluate managements stewardship, by investors for making decisions about whether to buy or sell securities, by credit rating services for making decisions about credit worthiness of entities, and by bankers for making decisions about whether to lend money. And the auditors responsibility is to express an opinion on whether management has fairly presented the information in the financial statements. In an...

    Read More
    9606 Words 25 Pages
  • Prosecution Attorney Misconduct Case Study Essay

    ...the intended good that results (conviction) outweighs the possible negative consequences (misleading the jury, undermining the adversary process, and possible erroneous convictions). An example given in the book is the case Miller v. Pate, where the prosecutor concealed from the jury that the pair of underpants with red stains on it were stained by paint, not blood. Another example is when the prosecutor said in his summation, the defendant and his lawyer “are completely unable to explain away their guilt.” 2. From the book, why might a Defense attorney act unethically? Provide a few examples? According to the book some defense attorneys may act unethically because they merge their professional life with their personal life and they get seduced by the power and the influence of the individuals by the ambition and aspiration for wealth, prestige and recognition clouds their judgment. For example, Frank Rogano used the representation of Santo and Jimmy of the Teamsters Union was a shortcut to success and then to become intimate friends with these infamous clients. Also, Rogano started to think like them and to rationalize their aberrant behavior. The proper role of a defense attorney is to represent a defendant in an honest way that seeks the truth in the case. 3. From the book, why might a Judicial Officer (Judge) act unethically? Provide a few examples? A judge can act unethically when in the time of sentencing the judge does not focus...

    Read More
    348 Words 2 Pages
  • Essay on The Witness for the Prosecution

    ...Where Is the Irony? I read the story “The Witness for the Prosecution” by Agatha Christie. Christie began writing during World War II. She earned the title of “a master of crime fiction” after the publication of her book “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd” in 1926. Also in 1926, Christie created a mystery of her own life when she disappeared for ten days. She was found checked into a hotel under a different name, suffering from amnesia. This incident actually increased the sales of her books (Great British Stories 273). The most visible literary element that Christie uses to make this story unique is the use of Irony. This story, told in third person limited, is about a young man, Leonard Vole, getting accused of murdering Ms. Emily French. Mr. Vole’s lawyer Mr. Mayherne, also called the solicitor, is trying to push a confession out of him, but he is not confessing because he is innocent. Mr. Vole explains how he does not know anything about the murder. He explains how he would never hurt Ms. French because she was like a second mother to him. Mr. Mayherne soon gets on Leonard side and tries to help him. The case that is built up against Leonard is pretty strong; Ms. French’s house keeper says some things that made him look like he was the one who had murdered Ms. French, so he has a slim chance to be proven innocent when he actually is. Mr. Mayherne gets Leonard’s alibi that he was at home with his wife who is “devoted” to him at the time of the...

    Read More
    747 Words 3 Pages
  • Medea Prosecution Essay

    ...When it comes down to murder, what difference does it make whether or not she felt justified? From what we can see, Medea clearly killed not only Creusa and Creon, but her own children. Good judge, I implore that you pay close attention to the horrible deeds that this woman has wrought on these innocent people. We can see that she had planned these murders out, and, despite knowing the evil she would soon unleash, continued with them with only the goal of hurting Jason. Medea hated Jason, and hate was also one of the overpowering motives of the murders. We know Medea killed them, and we know that she is completely guilty of over 5 murders. What man in his right mind would call this woman innocent? Medea couldn’t be innocent, for everything she did was done with the motive of hurting Jason. She even said it herself, “I’d still be joyful to know that every bone of your life is broken; you are left hopeless, friendless, mateless, childless, avoided by gods and men, unclean with awful excess of grief—childless—“ (II, 286-287). She killed her two sons, the king of Corinth, and the princess that Jason was marrying all to see him a broken man. If this isn’t guilt, then I do not know what could possibly be considered so. Medea broke every piece of happiness Jason had, and it was all carefully planned out. The evil woman knew, before actions were made, that in the end Creusa and Creon, and even her own sons, would be dead. She knew because she wanted Jason to feel hopeless....

    Read More
    518 Words 3 Pages

Popular Essays

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free