Preview

The Case of the Shipwrecked Sailors- Prosecution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Case of the Shipwrecked Sailors- Prosecution
In the "case of the shipwrecked sailors", three men were marooned after the sinking of an oil tanker. Subject to extreme conditions and starvation, the men drew lots after about twenty five days and decided that the loser would be killed and eaten as food. When one of the men lost the draw, he pulled out his consent, and the other two men killed him anyway, eating him. Five days later, the remaining two men were rescued and ensuing actions incurred their murder charges. This seems to be a simple case over the battle of life and death, and it truly is. The two men, Dudley and Stephens, made a conscious decision to commit not only the crime of murder, but the atrocity of cannibalism. Crime is crime and law is law- when breaks a law and commits a crime, a punishment must ensue. First of all, the actions committed by Dudley and Stephens were quite obviously illegal. Though not on the mainland, this court's jurisdiction falls in the area of the crime at hand. Laws are still laws in our waters. Secondly, the men decided to kill Brooks with the justification that he "was going to die soon anyway" and they should "get it over with". This type of euthanasia was completely unjustified, based on the fact that Brooks rejected the idea of having the men kill and eat him when his lot was drawn. Though Brooks may have been on his death bed, Dudley and Stephens committed murder by taking his life. Also, the discussion of drawing the lots was in no way contractual, thus making in no way a binding agreement on the obscene act. On all accounts, this crime is simply wrong and illegal. The morality and legality in "thou shall not kill" is a tenet that all citizens must abide, no matter the circumstances or personal beliefs of the individual. Though the situation of the men was tragic and stressful, a crime was committed and a man is dead. Brooks' life was deliberately taken by Dudley and Stephens, which signifies the punishable crime of murder. I recommend, pending a guilty

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic that has existed since the beginning of civilization. The death penalty, and capital punishment are interchangeable terms that provide legalized murders at the hands of the government. This form of killing is permitted in approximately 38 states (Capital Punishment, 2011). The death penalty has been a way for humans to control one another throughout history. The death penalty is a chancy way of instilling justice. In addition, there is no guarantee that the person sentenced to death is completely innocent. For many years, the death penalty has been the cause of many innocent and untimely deaths. The death penalty is a final decision to a possible mistake. Also, the death penalty infringes on…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “the moral arc of the universe bends at the elbow of justice.” In the short story, “Gentlemen Your Verdict”, twenty men and their captain become trapped in their submarine after an explosion. Their captain, Captain Oram, then unjustly sacrifices fifteen of his men to save five others. He takes it upon himself to make a life or death decision for fifteen innocent men. Justice is important to regulating actions and preserving virtue in society. In some cases murder can be justified (such as self defense), but in the case of Captain Oram, fifteen accounts of first-degree murder cannot. Captain Oram’s cowardice hasty judgment, and no one’s right to play God caused the death of these men. Captain Oram is not justified for the deaths of fifteen of his men.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    justice is a very important part of a view from the bridge and on the waterfront. justice comes in two forms, kazans view of true american justice which encourages the fight to free the distressed, the other form of justice does not follow morals but is driven by feelings of love hate and fear. In on the waterfront the dock workers are more slow and unwilling to follow the law, they fear justice will cause more trouble and not lessen the domination of the mob, the community does not seem to have much confidence in the law. In the view from the bridge loyalty is valued more than the law, this is shown when eddie ruled by his feelings betrays the community and becomes an exile in his own town. The law does not satisfy eddies desire for justice…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the state court case verse Roger “The Dodger” Smith and Jack Merridew was a very intriguing case. I have decided that Roger “The Dodger” Smith is guilty for both accounts of murder. In addition, Jack is also guilty, for the murder of Simon, but not the murder of Piggy. Murders should never be taken lightly, even if its accidental, you must fully investigate what happened on that day.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court of Missouri had a national consensus and people were against the execution of the mentally ill. Simmons had challenged if it were really right to give capital punishment to those who commit crimes as juveniles. This case was argued on October 13, 2004 and was decided on March 1, 2005. Simmons received the punishment of life in prison with no chances for…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Penalty of Death

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is very much one of society’s necessary evils, one that can never be clear cut…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before making the final decision the court considered the following factors, length of delay, prejudiced to the accused, explanation for the delay, and Waiver of Appellants. The Supreme Court then concluded that the delay of 2 years after the appellant's preliminary trial was unreasonable. The Crown did not justify the institutional delay and did not prove that the delay prejudiced the delay of the accused. Therefore, their final decision was to set the four men free as the delay was excessive. I agree with the court's decision because the Crown did not justify the reason for the 2-year delay, which was a violation of the men's charter rights. The men were also held in custody for 6 months before being proven guilty. This to me was the right ruling of the case because no serious crime was committed when the incident occurred, and the two-year delay was not appropriate for this type of…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Harvey Lee Windsor and Lavon Gunthrie were charge of the offense of robbery and murder of Rayford Howard in his store in St. Clair County. The appellant appealed the conviction and sentence to the Court of Criminal Appeals. The court reversed the conviction and remanded for a new trial, holding that the prosecutor had improperly referred to Windsor’s failure to testify at trial and holding that the circuit clerk’s practice of excusing potential jurors to whom jury service would prove burdensome constituted reversible error.…

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When looking at the case of The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens and the punishment that the two men face after conviction is one that requires a lot of thought (Brody and Acker, 2010). These two men were faced with a difficult situation that due to their being in a position of making life threating decisions that would determine if they all lived or if they all died with the sacrifice of one saving the other three men. These two men’s fate, after their criminal conviction, should be evaluated with the circumstances of the crime of murder with the intent of the two men to survive while stuck in the middle of the ocean with no way out (Gollwitzer and Keller, 2010).…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of brutal murder, your culture's pratices should not excuse you from taking a life. To do so without reason or to not use it as self defense is a horrific act.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Movie: Twelve Angry Men

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An innocent man is wrongly executed whilst a man who raped and murdered a mother and her thirteen year old daughter spends the rest of his life with three meals a day and cable television. Which of these is the bigger injustice? The use of the death penalty to punish serious crimes is a very controversial topic and there is much debate surrounding the issue. This paper will briefly discuss arguments supporting and against the use of the death penalty.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The worse scenario of a crime as seen as ethical is killing someone is self-defense. The debate of someone's life being more important than the attackers has several pros and cons. The person could be facing extreme punishments. Not only could it have legal punishments but mental punishments as well. Since the person would be abnormally violent, it could leave emotional damage. Taking someone's life into their own hands is a big decision and some people will argue that it is not worth it.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spel Case

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When presented with the crucial decision of life or death, people should do everything in their power to survive, no matter the cost. While on an excursion of spelunking, four friends find themselves trapped in a cave with limited amounts of food and water. In order to increase their chances of survival, one of the friends suggest drawing straws to see who will be killed and eaten for the benefit of the group. After killing the friend who was left with the shortest straw, the remaining spelunkers are rescued a couple weeks later and shared their story with their community. The friends are soon met with charges of homicide and disapproval from the public for their lack of moral awareness. This essay will argue that murder is justifiable when the reality of grim conditions exists. Consequences from such an action do not come to mind when decisions are based solely on emotions and not made with morals and ethical obligations set by society.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: Nine young black boys riding in an open train car were involved in a fight. When the fight ceased, two white women claimed the black boys raped them. Once the boys got off the train in Scottsboro, Alabama, police picked them up and placed them in jail. The men appeared in court, frightened, and unrepresented. The defendants were charged with a capital offence and therefore had the right for counsel to be appointed to them by the court. However, the court decided to call on the lawyers from the surrounding area. Of course no lawyer came to their defense. The day before the case, on April 6, a lawyer took their case. Because he was not able to prepare an adequate defense 8 of the 9 defendants were convicted and sentenced to death.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays