Preview

Gentlemen Your Verdict Essay; Justified

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gentlemen Your Verdict Essay; Justified
Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “the moral arc of the universe bends at the elbow of justice.” In the short story, “Gentlemen Your Verdict”, twenty men and their captain become trapped in their submarine after an explosion. Their captain, Captain Oram, then unjustly sacrifices fifteen of his men to save five others. He takes it upon himself to make a life or death decision for fifteen innocent men. Justice is important to regulating actions and preserving virtue in society. In some cases murder can be justified (such as self defense), but in the case of Captain Oram, fifteen accounts of first-degree murder cannot. Captain Oram’s cowardice hasty judgment, and no one’s right to play God caused the death of these men. Captain Oram is not justified for the deaths of fifteen of his men.

Captain Oram was a cowardice leader who led to the deaths if fifteen innocent men. He was weak and cowardice because he wasn’t a communicative leader. He kept his crew in the dark about his plan to sacrifice them for the “greater good”, “Have a drink served all round, please, Mr. Paull.” He said “And send four bottles forward to me. When everyone has had their drink, sen the five married men to me.” Captain Oram did not give his crew the information and the right to discuss and possibly come up with a solution. This was not only egotistical but also illogical. Killing himself out of sheer fear of what would happen to him if he survived, also makes him a cowardly leader. “I am going to join the others. Good-bye sir.” Captain Oram’s cowardice blindly led fifteen innocent crewmembers to their deaths. But it wasn’t only cowardice that led to their deaths, it was also Oram’s hasty decision making skills. Hastily decided actions are another reason Captain Oram is unjustified in the deaths of fifteen men. The captain was a hasty decision maker. In the story he spent only a few minutes deciding the fate of these fifteen unknowing men. Captain Oram came up with his plan in the matter

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I believe that Captain Oram had to make a decision, and he had to make it fast, as the air in the submarine was being quickly depleted. This justified his actions because if he did not make a quick decision they all would have died from asphyxiation. It was his responsibility, as the commander of all…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Odysseus A Good Leader

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First, Good leaders never ignore other teammates’ opinion and don’t make their team to be endangered. Odysseus ignored his crew’s opinion and that made them run into danger. In Book 9, line 253-259, his crew suggests to go back to their swift. However, Odysseus didn’t go back and he stayed there for polyphemous’ gift even though there is no certainty that polyphemous will give a gift. As…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American justice system is intended to be fair and unbiased. It is founded on the ideal that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty, and ensures the duty of proving a dispute charge rests with the prosecution. However this system has inevitable flaws as every individual’s beliefs, values and morals are affected by their own experiences and factors. While such factors could potentially be the systems weaknesses, they could also be its biggest strength bringing experience and understanding to the courtrooms. It is this contradiction that Reginald Rose aims to explore through his portrayal of jurors in his play “Twelve Angry Men.’ The play presents the possibility that some jurors are driven by prejudice, while others self-interest motives can jeopardize the rights of the defendant through aspirations to speed up the case. However Rose portrays a voice of reason through the ethical juror 8 and the unbigoted juror 11, these jurors help to represent Rose’s view that a fair trial can be held in a jury room full of flawed human characters that symbolize the spectrum of society.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    death was a result of failed accountability by his Squad leader, platoon sergeant, and his OIC.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine having to decide a young boy’s fate who is accused of murder in the first degree. This is the case in “Twelve Angry Men”, the prize-winning drama written by Reginald Rose. Some jurors address relevant topics, while others permit their personal “judgments” from thoroughly looking at the case. After hours of deliberation, the jurors reached the decision that the boy is not guilty, due to the fact of reasonable doubt. While few jurors are motivated by their respect and determination for the justice system, Juror 10 is motivated by his personal prejudice.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Several minutes later Lieutenant Calley returns and says “How come they aren’t dead?” The soldiers then turn to kill them although some seemed apparently uncomfortable and unwilling to do so. The situation in which the soldiers are left alone with prisoners display a similar behavior as witnessed with Why My Lai 1st semester project 46 the subject in the above mentioned experiment. After leaving the soldiers alone with the orders to “take care of them” they show subtle sympathy towards the gathered prisoners in “sparing” their lives rather than shooting them right away. This of course can be interpreted in the individual soldiers’ sense of moral ethics towards his fellow man, but under the circumstances of this specific, somewhat chaotic and brutal event one could just as much assume they are meant to kill the prisoners instead of simply guarding them. Comparing this situation with the experiment we encounter a slight problem when taking the concept of consequence into consideration. For the participant in the experiment there was no immediate consequence in not being obedient to the experimenter and raising the shock level when required. However, for the soldiers in the mentioned situation, they faced an authority figure which during the massacre was known to be life threatening towards the soldiers if they did not do what was ordered. The results of the experiment and the mentioned example differ as we look closer at a situational perspective; nonetheless we see similarities of the two when looking at the result of the given order in the absence of authority. The soldiers involved in My Lai were all part of an institution larger and more powerful than any of those used in the Milgram…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what degree should people follow orders of superiors due to their authority? A Few Good Men is a movie where the moral difference between right and wrong is very unclear in the name of following authority. Professors of sociology, Kelman and Hamilton worked together on “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” where they tried to apply reason to the soldiers who committed a massacre of unarmed women and children during the Vietnam War. Theodore Dalrymple is a physician who wrote “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” by analyzing Milgram’s electric shock torture experiment to shine light on when is right to obey to authority, while he emphasizes not to follow authority blindly. These pieces can be used to understand how Marines were able to kill a fellow Marine in Rob Reiner’s A Few Good Men.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gentlemen, Your Verdict is a story that teaches us that sometimes in life we have to kill, or let someone die to ensure the survival of others. In this story Lieutenant-Commander Oram (who’s in charge of the submarine) is forced to play god when his submarine goes down. There is only enough air for two days and rescue won’t come until five days after their oxygen supply will run out. Lieutenant-Commander Oram would rather let some of his crew survive than have them all die. But he has a hard choice to make: who will be the ones to survive, which I believe is also a part of the theme. He makes a solemn choice to kill sixteen men, including himself, to save the lives of the five married men on-board; because they have a wife and possibly even children that would live sorrowfully if their father was gone. This statement is turned around in Always a Motive, where a father loses his son and wife and is forced to live a miserable life alone.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Twelve Angry Men, a play by Reginald Rose, was written in 1955 at a time when America was involved in a cold war with communist countries. It shows the strength of a deliberative process that enables individuals, who have “nothing to gain or lose,” to reach a verdict. In the American jury system “everybody deserves a fair trial” and in Twelve Angry Men the defendant gets a very fair trial. All the jurors have their own opinions on the case but in the end a decision is made. The jury, and the audience, never discovers if in fact the defendant did murder his father. His guilt or innocence seems to be almost irrelevant. At the beginning of the play the vote was 11-1 in favour of guilty but the 8th Juror convinces the others to have another vote. As the play progresses more and more jurors being to change their vote and by the end of the play the vote was 11-1 in favour of ‘not guilty.’ The defendant does get a fair trial because throughout the play there was enough “reasonable doubt” for him to be guilty. The 10th juror had no intentions on giving the defendant a ‘fair trial’ and just wanted him to be sent to the “electric chair.” By the play’s end all twelve men had agreed to a “not guilty” vote. The 8th Juror had managed, by simply pointing out “sometimes the facts that are staring you in the face are wrong!” to convince even the strongest advocates of a “guilty” verdict that reasonable doubt exists and therefore the defendant gets a fair trial.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odysseus: A Good Leader

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the traits that makes Odysseus a good leader is his caution. Without his caution he and his men would have died right away. An example of this is when he entered Polyphemus’s cave. [“Why not take these cheeses, get them stowed, come back, throw open all the pens, and make a run for it? We’ll drive the kids and lambs aboard. We say put out again on good salt water! Ah, how sound that was! Yet I refused. I wished to see the caveman, what he had to offer no pretty sight, it turned out , for my friends.”{900}] Another example of this is when they approached the Sirens. Odysseus ordered his men to put beeswax in their ears so they won’t crash the ship. The last and best example might be when he got home to Ithaca. He didn’t rush home right away, but stayed back and thought of plan. If he would have rushed home he would have been killed by the suitors. Without his caution, Odysseus and his crew would have been pressed into more dangerous situations and died. Odysseus is very cautious and he would not have proceeded without a plan.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the comedy epic, The Odyssey by Homer, Odysseus is not a good leader because his arrogance caused his crew members to pass away and the lack of trust from his crew made him unable to control his crew.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Captain Oram’s dilemma is that he has to make a decision who decided about life and dead. He knows that not everyone can survive; but if he decides that five man survive,…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It all began most recently when I was asked to prosecute a case for the crown, involving Lieutenant Harry Morant and the whole British Empire. Lieutenant Harry Morant was charged for the killing of the Boer prisoners. He claimed that Sir Lord Kitchener had ordered him to leave no prisoners alive. Harry was known as a fantastic poet and horse breaker hence the name “breaker” Morant. However war is a terrible teacher where good men are asked to do unspeakable things. This case offers another pit fall. Sir, Breaker Morant in any other situation would be seen as a good soldier. What I don’t understand is how can those in trusted with defending the crown be sentenced to death for killing when their job is to kill, It doesn’t make sense. I felt ashamed of myself during the trial, prosecuting innocent men, It made me want to throw up. Also knowing that no matter what evidence the defence gave, in the end Lord Kitchener would have the final say. Even if I was for or against the…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Justice and Injustice are Sometimes Synonymous Introduction • Start out with a basic summary of the characters and preconceived ideas in “The Warden” • Transition into ideas behind how society, religion, and subjective ideals alter what individual ideas of “justice” are o Consider how the different actions perceived as “justice” in The Warden actually had consequences others could consider unjust. • Thesis: Despite many good intentions in the world, often, actions taken in the name of justice result in more injustices than intended, leaving one to wonder; how much do individual factors affect someone’s idea of “justice”, or right and wrong? Body • Reveal more plot information, particularly the information about Harding’s kindness and willingness…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice In Billy Buddd

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is seen as the right thing to do is not always the lawful thing to do. This concept as a whole is explored deeply in the conclusion to Herman Melville’s novel Billy Budd, Sailor, as Captain Vere executes foretopman Billy Budd for what seems like a justifiable crime to the reader, under an undiscriminating law. The idea of capital punishment for laws that do not take into account anything but pure facts has long been debated on moral and ethical grounds, and Melville explores both sides; the side of justice, which would have let Billy live, and the side of the law, which condemned Billy to death. Through the character of Captain Vere, “Billy Budd, Sailor” reveals the conflict between law and justice, and how Billy’s execution by Captain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays