Preview

Summary Of The Film 'Hydraulic Fracking'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Film 'Hydraulic Fracking'
The central argument of the film is that there is a risk caused by contaminated drinking water from ground water sources which tends to be a result of hydraulic fracking. All water is connected so if an individual or company pollutes an area where the water is, the water will inevitably become polluted over time as well.
This argument is effective mostly due to the fact that the film showed that the government and large cooperations were getting away with being responsible for causing health concerns for both humans and animals. Additionally, this documentary used the stories of real people that were living through terrible situations. What gave the fracking industry the upper hand is that oil and gas industries were exempt from abiding by
…show more content…
When it comes to hydraulic fracking, of all the water that is pumped into the ground only about half of it comes back up so there is a lot of water that has the ability to get into the water table causing contamination. Companies cannot monitor water conditions until they know what to monitor. Residents of Dimock complained of issues with their water but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said their water was just fine and safe for consumption. The residents never had a problem with their water but once drilling started taking place in their area then they started having problems with their water. It is not just a few people in the area having an issue with their water, it is everyone having the same problem of not having drinkable water. Some people were even able to light their water on fire which should not be able to be done. In one instance, a gentleman turned on a sink in his garage and light a lighter next to the water and it ignited fairly quickly and it produced a large flame. Even news stations broadcasted on air that people in the community had unsafe groundwater and that it was tested and said to have been contaminated due to natural gas. People repeatedly …show more content…
In particular, even though I appreciate that real people and events were used in this film, not all of the sources were credible especially one family in particular. One family did not want to talk to the media about their water being able to be lit on fire and when Josh Fox wanted to interview them they let him in but would not let him tape their faces and did not share much information with him initially. They later called him back and said money is not worth it and that their health is more important so he was given a sample of their water in a jar to find out what was in the water. Another instance that seemed odd was when Josh Fox was asked by an individual he was interviewing if he had a message he was trying to get across with his film and he did not give an answer to the gentleman he just said “um.” Actual government representation was not present in the documentary to point out what they may or may not be doing wrong with the issue of hydraulic fracking. It was only a few people who work for higher up government companies that were brave enough and know what they are doing as a company is wrong and they cannot stand for it any

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fracking occurs when “water wells become plugged up with sand and other minerals. A machine is brought in to inject water into the well at extreme pressure to blow out the tiny cracks and fissures in the rock through which the water flow.” (Fracking Threatens Everyone) Completely harmless. Or so it seemed at that time. Today dealing with increased pollution, it contaminated this ‘wonderful’ thing. “Fracking injects large quantities of water under great pressure with sand and many toxic chemicals mixed in. Many of these are can cause cancer…Unfortunately, when fracking goes wrong, sources of drinking water ca be ruined and all different types of pollution can happen in a second.” (Fracking Threatens Everyone) Just like that, in a blink of an eye, something wonderful was turned around and causes more problems than we can…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Methane can likewise prompt ground water bringing about a genuine danger to individuals' wellbeing, something that must be more controlled and checked upon. As indicated by Dictionary.com, a narrative is a motion picture, or a TV or radio program that gives a verifiable record or report, comprising official pieces and sources. There are constantly two sides to a story and afterward there is a truth. "Gasland" is a narrative film by Josh Fox specifically exploring into the residential common gas industry and its overwhelming effects on the earth and human wellbeing. Then again, "Fracknation" is a narrative film that assaults claims by the counter fracking film "Gasland" whose movie producers pulled in national regard for water quality worries by setting faucet water ablaze. Rather, they go more top to bottom attempting to get the genuine accurate answers of the circumstances and end results hydraulic fracking prompts. A narrative is a film that must be demonstrated accurate, be that as it may, as indicated by "Fracknation": a great deal of the data observed in "Gasland" is turned out to be false…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: There is major debate both for and against using the fracking method to extract natural gas from the ground, but I propose that the federal government establish, monitor, and regulate environmental and health risks, and then create a minimum standard which the states are required to follow. Background: In the 1940’s the Halliburton Corporation developed a process to revitalize well production and prolong the life of wells nearing the end of their production cycle. The fracturing process, called “fracking”, pumps a mixture of water and sand, along with some chemical additives, at high pressures to create additional fractures in the sedimentary rock.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gasland Film Analysis

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the documentary Gasland Josh Fox talked about how people's properties were being invaded by fracking industries which is "hydraulic fracturing" which is drilling into the ground for natural gas as Josh Fox explained in this documentary. All of these people had been suffering with the water portion of it because with the oil drilling there water pipes were mixed in with the oil which there water faucets water came mixed with oil which meant that the water is not drinkable that’s why Fox went into a little adventure so he can personally see this and get evidence from all of these people with high oil underground. By visiting all of these people that were high in oil which most of the industries offered money for their land which was not enough…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘ Spills, accidents, improper disposal and poor well construction can lead the toxic chemicals in fracking fluid entering drinking water; more than 1,000 cases of water contamination near drilling sites were documented nationally’ according to the Food and Water Watch group. This adverse pollution of groundwater cannot be reversed and it may be difficult to detect and address all the problem sources because Fracking Companies do not need to disclose what is used in the process. Fracking can also lead to droughts as water is sometimes extracted from already water-deprived communities. Only a tiny percent of water is regained and stored in pits, and still ends up being hazardous to living things around them. There were many reports of illnesses in livestock that were exposed to these waste water pits, and according to the results of an experimental study every tree exposed to fracking…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaslands Part II

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Obviously, polluting groundwater that people use to drink breaks many environmental rules set by the government and the Environmental Protection Agency. The people of Dimock and other areas (Pavillion, Wyoming, parts of Arkansas, and multiple places across Texas were the spots highlighted in the movie) had water that was not only undrinkable because of such high toxin content, but could be lit on fire because of the extreme amounts of gas in it. When the EPA was brought in to evaluate however, they declared the water “clean”, even though they had results that were released afterwards that obviously said the water was extremely dangerous to drink. The operation was just too profitable to make the oil companies stop. The control over the EPA was a…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gas Man Cometh

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The documentary, “Gas Land”, by Josh Fox, is a film about the problems with contaminated groundwater due to excessive and unregulated natural gas extraction across the country. In the film, Fox travels all over to talk to many people who have rented out their land to natural gas companies, only to get contaminated water and no help from any company or organization with the problems that ensue. Fox uses many techniques in his film to get across his point that America should not be subjected into a wasteland because of poor industry ethics and unregulated polluting of our water sources. By building his appeals, especially to ethos, as well as arranging many elements of the film, Fox creates a very staunch argument.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The environmentalist/anti fracking point of view shown in the documentary “Gasland” is a very informative, and important documentary that people everywhere should watch. The narrator, Josh Fox offers several valid and intelligent points about the possible dangers of fracking, and the many chemicals used in it. However, Fox is a very biased narrator, and at several points offers invalid evidence. For example, Fox attempts to instill fear in the viewer, in his controversial scene, detailing the many chemicals used in fracking fluid. While these chemicals are carcinogens, in the movie “Frack Nation,” it is explained by a UC Berkeley professor, that these chemicals are not harmful to humans. The professor states that millions of the chemicals in our daily lives are classified as carcinogens, but don’t give humans cancer in the doses we are exposed to. Some of his comparisons to chemicals giving cancer are almost as rash as saying one cigarette will give you terminal lung cancer. This is evident as even experts such as Alan J. Krupnick of Resources For the Future describe his documentary as an “Unabashed and one-sided bashing of the oil and gas industry... The relatively esoteric issue of fugitive methane gives way to some really outrageous statements." It seems as though Fox’s main goal was not to express the truth about the oil and gas industry, but his wild claims were more directed toward creating drama. John Hangar of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection was quoted as saying that “This movie certainly contributes to more public misunderstanding.” Another key citation is the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission stating “Gasland incorrectly attributes several cases of water well contamination in Colorado to oil and gas development when our investigations determined that the wells in question contained biogenic methane that is not attributable to such development.” Fox is clearly not a reliable source. Also Fox’s main examples in the movie…

    • 897 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pennsylvania Act 13 of 2012 is an act that imposed stronger environmental standards and authorized local governments to adopt impact fees, and build upon the state’s efforts to move towards energy independence as unconventional gas development (hydraulic fracturing) continues. Some of the act’s provisions include increased setback requirements for hydraulic fracturing; enhancing the protection of water supplies; and strong, uniform, and consistent statewide environmental standards.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking in North Texas

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fracking requires up to 5 million gallons of water per well and perhaps even more in which case, the tons of water used would create a huge demand of local water supplies (Dong). Unlike agriculture or domestic water uses, gas drilling does not return the used water back into in the ground (Myers). The water can not go back into the ground because the returned water not only has added chemicals that helped with fracturing but also has about 40,000 gallons of chemicals that were previously added (Dong). Sometimes, the used water can leak out in surrounding lakes and rivers. Those lakes and rivers supply the surrounding communities with water but now since fracking, the water is polluted. The chemicals that are in the water can cause serious illnesses and possibly be life threatening since most chemicals are poisonous.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern environmental justice movement began in the mid- 20th century, when the country realized that the environment needed help. This movement throughout the last several decades has evolved from protecting woodland areas from deforestation to protection against the gas industry. Hydraulic fracturing is the process by which natural gas is extracted from the earth’s shales. The process begins with drilling through several layers of the earth, like the freshwater aquifer. Next, water with “fracking fluid” is injected into the drilled area to crack the shale. This water comes back up to the surface and is put into a pit to evaporate. The natural gas flows up, and is then stored. The process is simple enough, but so are the consequences. Hydraulic fracturing has detrimental environmental consequences and should be banned.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One good effect that fracking has had and Gold noted, is that fracking has significantly improved our economy by creating more jobs for people. For many years our economy had suffered with plummeting unemployment rates, but about 10 years ago when fracking came about it was like a savior had come because fracking provided more jobs and in turn lowered the unemployment rate. In some ways fracking is a better alternative for the environment. Burning coal is very hazardous to the environment because of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. Fracking does not produce CO2 emissions because it is natural gas that is being produced and thus it is technically cleaner…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While fracking accidents are mostly harming the animals, fracking also pollutes the water, consequently people are noticing a huge change in water quality. Fracking contaminates the water in a very obvious way. Fracking could had been done only using water and clean sand. However to make the job easier and cheaper, the process includes many other 596 or more chemicals, many were harmful and some were unknown. Even though the fluid used in the process is pumped out after doing its job, it's impossible to get it all out. People found black grease, odors, methane, a gassy taste, and black sediments in their drinking water after the…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently in an article titled “Fracking, 2013,” it was reported that potentially toxic chemicals – including cancer-causing benzene – have been found in the air near fracking sites. (Polsen) Regions containing many drilling rigs have high levels of smog as well as other airborne pollutants, including potential carcinogens, which are substances directly involved in causing cancer. Benzene and other chemicals that irritate eyes and cause headaches, sore throats, or difficulty breathing were found in the air near the wells as well. Many people have become incredibly sick because of where they live. When these residents look to the government for help, the only answer they receive is to simply move out of their homes. Some people have resided in the same home their entire lives and refuse to leave, thus becoming…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people are uninformed about fracking. Some believe that fracking causes cancer. This is untrue, and has been disproven by highly qualified epidemiologists, such as David Risser. Others are convinced that fracking contaminates groundwater, thus polluting our drinking water. This, however, has been investigated. So far, experts from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have not definitely linked the contamination to fracking. It could be caused by any number of outside pollutants. There are still more claims that fracking has caused cattle to die. However, these claims have also been proven false. Yes, cattle died in several areas where fracking was in progress nearby. No, these deaths were not caused by fracking. In every case, the cattle's deaths were caused by unrelated occurrences. The backlash that advocates for fracking are experiencing is caused by those who have not bothered to check their facts, or insist upon disputing any statement or conclusion that opposes their beliefs.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays