Preview

Gasland And Fracknation: Film Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1474 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gasland And Fracknation: Film Analysis
"Gasland" and "Fracknation" are two documentary films based off hydraulic fracturing. Hydraulic fracturing as indicated by dictionary.com is the forcing open of fissures in subterranean rocks by introducing liquid at high pressure, especially to extract oil or gas. Hydraulic fracturing started as a trial in 1947. It is a technique where a high weight of liquid (more often than not chemicals suspended in water) is infused into a wellbore to make splits in the profound rock arrangements through which regular gas, petroleum, and salt water will flow all more freely. Other than the United States, hydraulic fracking happens in New Zealand, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Fracking has been proven gainful and additionally unbeneficial to numerous …show more content…
Methane can likewise prompt ground water bringing about a genuine danger to individuals' wellbeing, something that must be more controlled and checked upon. As indicated by Dictionary.com, a narrative is a motion picture, or a TV or radio program that gives a verifiable record or report, comprising official pieces and sources. There are constantly two sides to a story and afterward there is a truth. "Gasland" is a narrative film by Josh Fox specifically exploring into the residential common gas industry and its overwhelming effects on the earth and human wellbeing. Then again, "Fracknation" is a narrative film that assaults claims by the counter fracking film "Gasland" whose movie producers pulled in national regard for water quality worries by setting faucet water ablaze. Rather, they go more top to bottom attempting to get the genuine accurate answers of the circumstances and end results hydraulic fracking prompts. A narrative is a film that must be demonstrated accurate, be that as it may, as indicated by "Fracknation": a great deal of the data observed in "Gasland" is turned out to be false

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When watching the documentary "Gasland" by Josh Fox , I have had no prior knowledge of what Fracking truly was. I have to say though as this documentary was in full swing I couldn't keep my eyes off the screen. As I couldn’t believe after watching this film what fracking was. I thought fracking was insanely harmful to not only animals , humans and the property they both live on as well. It did two very different things when it came to animals and humans. When it comes to the animals they were the ones that had no choose but to drink it so they were not only dying because of it but they also had hair lose, and are unable to eat be as well. This is terrible for the farmers cause they now cannot breed this cow or this pig , they now cannot…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Frack or Not to Frack

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” is the process of drilling and injecting fluid into the ground at high pressures in order to release natural gas from shale rocks by fracturing them. It takes an abundance of resources to create just one fracking well. Each gas well needs on average four hundred tanker trucks to carry water and supplies to the site. Fracking uses a great deal of water. Each fracturing job requires one to eight million gallons of water to complete it. Hydraulic fracturing has a huge effect on the environment primarily due to all the harmful chemicals used in the process. Some people don't want to ban fracking because it reduces imports of natural gas to america and it creates jobs, but many of these workers are being injured from working on the fracking site. In addition to poisoning its workers and the environment fracking is actually more expensive than traditional drilling.…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    gasland analysis

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the beginning, the narrator Josh finds out a hydro-fracking rig has opened near his house. He is afraid that it will pollute his water source, so he starts documenting the effects of hydro-fracking on his neighbor's waters supplies. He goes on a trip to personally document the effects of hydro-fracking on people’s homes. When he goes out west, he discovers the government has turned a blind eye to the drilling process and the harmful effects the chemicals can the water supply. Through his documentary he discovers that not just water can be affected. He encounters a woman named Ms. Blackburn and discovers that her father who had been documenting this for years had died two months after a rig had been installed near his house due to pancreatic cancer. Similar cases had developed throughout every sight josh visited. The film concludes with the case between the Environmental board and the drilling company in which the company was not able to defend themselves. This was partly due to Josh and the samples he collected.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gasland Film Analysis

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gasland did a great job of convincing us as audience by teaching us about natural gas which all of the natural gas is found underground according to google.com "Flammable gas, consisting largely of methane and other hydrocarbons, occurring naturally underground (often in association with petroleum) and used as fuel." People should watch gasland documentary because people don’t have the knowledge about what fracking…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is nothing fictitious about the arguments in fracking. Hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, is a way of obtaining oil and gas through the practice of cracking open rocks at high pressures using water, sand, and various chemicals (Jackson, 2016, para. 1). All over America, numerous interest groups participate in a continuous debate on the ethics of this procedure. Two prominent documentaries that circulate the media are FrackNation by Phelim McAleer and Gasland by Josh Fox. Each documentary presents its view of pro-fracking and anti-fracking, respectively through a series of various logical fallacies. FrackNation efficiently refutes the claims of Gasland through the effective use of logical fallacies.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gasland Josh Fox Analysis

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gasland is a documentary written, produced and directed by founder and artistic director of international WOW Company, Josh Fox. The film won six awards including Special Jury Prize in 2010 Sundace Film Festival and was also nominated for an Academy Awards for best documentary in 2011. The film shows effects of natural gas drilling on water sources and the environment. It also shows the influence of big businesses on legislatures that leaves the very own people who elected them to represent, unheard, ignored, misrepresented and hopeless. It is the best work of Josh Fox so far. The film makes good effort to convince us that fracking is contaminating drinking water sources…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking, or Hydraulic Fracturing is the process of pumping a high-pressured fluid (consisting out of water, sand, and other chemicals) into shale rocks to widen the fractures (Fracking). This releases the pockets of gas or petroleum inside the rock, and making them accessible to the human (Hyder, Joseph).…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hydraulic Fracturing or fracking was first introduced in 1940s and has then been a key provider of natural gas and oil worldwide. Despite its expansion and customary use, fracking still poses many health and environmental concerns. During fracking, pressurized liquids are injected into drilled wells, which cause the surrounding rock to crack open allowing gas and oil flow through the fissures. Millions of gallons of water are used and a similarly large volume of waste water is generated. Most of the water is never restored and the stored waste water and fracking fluid can adversely affect the animals and vegetation around it. Along with the water, other chemicals are injected into the ground as far as 10,000 feet below the surface and enter groundwater, polluting drinking sources for many. Fracking may be a key provider of oil but this expensive, polluting, low energy-return process is not worth the loss of wildlife habitat, natural land and innumerable water resources.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaslands Part II

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie Gaslands: Part II highlights the many problems with fracking for natural gas in the United States. It starts by showing the support of politicians and President Barack Obama himself. Gradually, the movie starts to show the wrongs that the oil companies are committing while fracking. The natural gas is so profitable that the injustice seems like a minor setback in the quest for the end results. Throughout the movie, it shows how families are affected, and just how spread out these families are throughout the country, which goes to show the extent to which the country is affected.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I knew that fracking was a contentious issue to say the least, and I have always held some degree of disdain towards big oil companies so I cannot say I was unbiased at the outset. My initial perception while watching Gasland was that this industry might actually help the communities mentioned in the film, however, I changed my tack very quickly when I began to think about how fracking makes inequality even worse, a sad truth, but an evident one. In that way, my perception of communities affected by fracking was unjustified and wrong. Though my perception of fracking communities was wrong, my perception of oil companies was galvanized further. It is obvious that these massive corporations are only out for profit, which is an obvious truth, but one that is hugely important. They do not care about who they are driving out of their homes, what they are doing to vulnerable communities or what happens when they leave. The bottom line is the only thing that matters and if worsening inequality is the price, then they have no problem paying it. My perception of people paid off by these companies is harmful because my initial thought was that this was a good thing for less fortunate people, when it clearly is not. The mistake in my perception of big oil companies is that the damage caused cannot be reversed, and that they are unstoppable, when the power to stop them is very much in the hands of the average person. The environmental effects are no doubt horrible, but I feel as though the social effects must be discussed more in order to make the changes necessary to put an end to…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Fracking Is Bad

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is fracking, Fracking is the process of drilling down into the earth before a high-pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which allows the gas to flow out to the head of the well. The process can be carried out vertically or, more commonly, by drilling horizontally to the rock layer and can create new pathways to release gas or can be used to extend existing channels. The term fracking refers to how the rock is fractured apart by the high pressure mixture.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fracking Pros And Cons

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hydraulic fracturing, also termed hydrofracturing, hydrofracking, or simply fracking, is hotly debated for its economic and environmental impacts. Fracking is the process by which rock is fractured by a pressurized fluid containing water. chemicals and sand to access natural gas, petroleum and brine from great depths of the Earth’s surface. Fracking produces the economic benefit of more accessible hydrocarbons, not to mention the 2.5 million fracking related jobs that were recorded in 2012 worldwide, one million of which were in the United States alone (FracFocus: ECHO-EPA Violations). However, many fear the environmental effects. Risks include ground and surface water contamination, air and noise pollution, and an increase in seismic activity. Hazards to public health and the environment are yet to be discovered, because the first commercial application did not begin until the late 1940’s; however, hydraulic fractures have been recorded naturally throughout time (The Truth about…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, is the process of injecting a combination of sand, water, and chemicals with very high pressure into deep rock formations such as coal beds, shale, and tight sandstone to break up the rocks and release natural gas, an affordable energy source that helps to meet the continuously growing need of the world for power. This procedure has been being performed for decades ultimately causing some controversy about the benefits vs. the dangers. Some of the supporters might say that fracking in our home lands will mean cheaper fuel and less outsourcing to other countries, while the anti-fracking groups may argue that it is unsafe to our surroundings because of the hazardous chemicals possibly leaking into our tap water and that fossil fuels are a limited resource. I honestly believe that it will be beneficial to our country to continue with this process because the pros are outweighing the cons.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hydrofracking is a new development in natural gas extraction. In addition, hydrofracking refers to hydraulic fracturing, a technique in which large amounts of water, combined with smaller amounts of chemicals and sand, are pumped under high pressure into a drilled gas well. However, concerns have been raised regarding with this is the fact that the drills can hit water sources and contaminate our water. Between hitting water sources and releasing greenhouse gasses, the process of hydraulic fracturing can be and often is harmful to both our environment and health.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Literature 20review

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fracking is the process of drilling down into the earth before a high-pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which allows the gas to flow out to the head of the well. Most of the oil and gas which is being fracked comes from sedimentary shale rock. This rock is made of clay and other minerals. In the past many layers of shale rock were inaccessible which is why hydraulic fracturing was so inefficient, however with today’s technological advancements we are now able to drill horizontally and have access to much larger forms of shale rock. Instead of drilling deeper oil companies can now drill sideways and pass through the shale, shoot them with highly pressurized liquid to crack the sediments open and release the fuel. When collecting oil out of the ground, air is pumped through the shale instead. This…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays