Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Fracking

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Fracking
Thesis: There is major debate both for and against using the fracking method to extract natural gas from the ground, but I propose that the federal government establish, monitor, and regulate environmental and health risks, and then create a minimum standard which the states are required to follow.
Background: In the 1940’s the Halliburton Corporation developed a process to revitalize well production and prolong the life of wells nearing the end of their production cycle. The fracturing process, called “fracking”, pumps a mixture of water and sand, along with some chemical additives, at high pressures to create additional fractures in the sedimentary rock. This process releases hydrocarbons into the wellbore where it gathers in small pockets
…show more content…
They are concerned that millions of gallons of contaminated wastewater are produced from fracking methods and that there are currently no facilities operating to remove these pollutants. When separated by a mile or more from groundwater sources and the earth’s surface, the ancient marine waters along with naturally existing toxic compounds are not an issue, but “Fracking disturbs, distributes, and carries upward with the fracked gas ‘produced waters’ containing radioactive materials, heavy metals, hydrocarbons such as BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and toluene [sic.]), bromide, highly concentrated salts, and many other organic and inorganic compounds that, when exposed to our environment, are dangerous health hazards—many are known as carcinogens and toxic to biological life” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). Which brings up the question of why can’t they use less toxic chemicals in the fracking process? Tracy Carluccio, the Deputy Director of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, continues by stating, “even if companies were to switch to ‘green’, ‘non-toxic’ fracking fluids, drilling and fracking in these deep formations will always deliver potentially deadly chemical hazards, even in a perfectly regulated world” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). The cement and steel casings used in combination with the methods for sealing post-production gas wells do not confine the methane along with other dangerous gases and contaminated fluids that are pressurized within the aquifer. Challengers feel any economic benefits from using the fracking process would be short-lived and would be ignoring reports of risks to public health, air quality, weakening of ground stability, contamination of groundwater, permanently altering the local ecology, and the use of vast amounts of water

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Fracking has become a nation wide debate and one that doesn’t seem to have an end. The state of North Carolina is one of the most involved areas of the fracking process. “North Carolina is sitting on top of large natural gas reserves (WRAL 1).” For this reason, many natural gas companies come to North Carolina for business. This helps the states economy because it produces more income and creates more jobs. The only problem is that the hydraulic fracking process has a reputation of contaminating local drinking water. This causes controversy with the citizens in cities such as Raleigh. Many cities welcome fracking while others try to completely ban it. The worst problem with fracking is that there seems to be no alternatives for it. Fracking is the only current process that can supply the efficient amount of natural gases. Therefore, fracking must not be banned but corrected so it can obtain natural gases in a safe manner.…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hydraulic Fracturing or fracking was first introduced in 1940s and has then been a key provider of natural gas and oil worldwide. Despite its expansion and customary use, fracking still poses many health and environmental concerns. During fracking, pressurized liquids are injected into drilled wells, which cause the surrounding rock to crack open allowing gas and oil flow through the fissures. Millions of gallons of water are used and a similarly large volume of waste water is generated. Most of the water is never restored and the stored waste water and fracking fluid can adversely affect the animals and vegetation around it. Along with the water, other chemicals are injected into the ground as far as 10,000 feet below the surface and enter groundwater, polluting drinking sources for many. Fracking may be a key provider of oil but this expensive, polluting, low energy-return process is not worth the loss of wildlife habitat, natural land and innumerable water resources.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the process of fracking using thousands upon thousands of gallons of water, we can run the risk of polluting the water table below our home area. There are issues with property being de-valued because of “mandatory pooling” (nofrackohio.com). One could assume that no one wants to have a huge pool of hydraulic fracking waste sitting about their land and potentially being the reason for ruining the wells and creeks nearby. What about the animals? I am sure if the creeks and creek beds are affected, then the life of the animals there must be devastated as…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the U.S., there are more than 500,000 active natural gas wells. Each of these wells requires 400 tanker tucks in order to carry water as well as supplies to the site where fracking will occur. For each of these individual fracking jobs, 1 to 8 million gallons of water is used. About 40,000 gallons of chemicals (per one fracturing job) are used and mixed with the water to create the "fracking fluid." What people do not know, is that up to 600 different chemicals are used in this "fracking fluid," including known toxins and carcinogens such as lead, mercury, uranium, ethylene glycol, radium, methanol, hydrachloric acid, and formaldehyde. These chemicals are known to cause cancer and other health problems. 72 trillion gallons of water and 360 billion gallons of these cancerous chemicals are needed to run our current gas wells.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oil Fracking

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My name is Santiago Arellano, and I am a resident of Broomfield Colorado. I would like to present my opinion on the North Park Hydraulic Fracturing. Hydraulic Fracturing is a very ingenious way of removing oil from the deep Shale, which we have been unable to reach. This method, also known as Fracking, is also very small. It starts out with a drill rig and a holding tank for the first 3 months, but then once the well is dug, it looks like another oil drill, and will continue to draw oil from the ground for the next 20-30 years. Fracking involves the use of radioactive materials, explosives, and hazardous chemicals. I believe that, as Fracking becomes more popular, and less scrutinized, the watch over it will become less strict, and these materials will leak into groundwater, or into our rivers and lakes.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking, when not carried out safely has been known to contaminate our groundwater due to leakages of the chemicals used in the procedure. Fracking has also been linked to cause small earthquakes in nearby areas where fracking is taking place. Some people also fear fracking because of the BP incident that happened back in April of 2010 where millions of barrels of oil were spilled into the Gulf of Mexico. In his chapter, “Ghost Ridin’ Grandpa,” Gold explains what the problem was for BP and how it could have been avoided The BP oil spill was the result of not performing the tests needed to make sure that the cement used for the well formed a solid seal. The cement did not form the proper barrier that was needed and as a result when BP’s drill bit arrived at the targeted site, combustible natural gas mixed with petroleum, and they ignited as they pushed up to the surface causing the well to spill an uncontrollable amount into the Gulf of Mexico. This accident could have been totally avoidable had the proper tests been taken and the proper tools for the well had been used. It is at this point when Dr. Claude E. Cooke Jr., otherwise known as a legend of hydraulic fracturing, invented a new tool for oil wells that will make drilling for oil safer. Cooke’s tool functions as a thermometer as it takes measurement of temperatures within a well and by looking at these temperatures companies can make sure that their wells are in a…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, is damaging our watersheds and for some of us, fracking sites are in our own backyards. The Environmental Protection Agency seems to have a few holes in it, as you will see in my research. First, we need to understand how fracking works. It is a means of extracting natural gas and oil that lies within a shale rock formation thousands of feet below earth’s surface. When a well is drilled, millions of gallons of water, sand and all different chemicals are injected under high pressure, into the well. With all the pressure, it causes mini earthquakes, fracturing the ground and allowing natural gas to flow more freely. These wells are in locations that were previously inaccessible, ruining our beautiful countryside and being drilled below our reservoirs and water systems. Horizontal fracking uses a mixture of up to 600 different chemicals along with water. Some of these chemicals are known carcinogens and toxins including lead, uranium, mercury, ethylene glycol, radium, methanol, hydrochloric acid and formaldehyde. Let’s do the math; 500,000 active gas wells in the U.S, multiply that by 8 million gallons of water, multiply the 18 times a well can be fracked. That comes to 72 trillion gallons of water, 360 billion gallons of chemicals needed to run current gas wells. (dangersoffracking.com)…

    • 1987 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While fracking accidents are mostly harming the animals, fracking also pollutes the water, consequently people are noticing a huge change in water quality. Fracking contaminates the water in a very obvious way. Fracking could had been done only using water and clean sand. However to make the job easier and cheaper, the process includes many other 596 or more chemicals, many were harmful and some were unknown. Even though the fluid used in the process is pumped out after doing its job, it's impossible to get it all out. People found black grease, odors, methane, a gassy taste, and black sediments in their drinking water after the…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking has become more popular of the last 50 years but ever since then people have become aware of the fact that it is hazardous to not only our health but also to the environment. Studies have shown that people who live near fracking site are more at risk to getting diseases such as cancer and having babies that will be born with birth defects. According to the results obtained from the survey more than 70% of people don’t know that 25% of the chemicals used during fracking are cancer causing. Only 15% of people knew that fracking can cause infertility and birth…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Research Paper

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, “Up to forty thousand gallons of chemicals are used in each fracking operation, containing a toxic bath of 600 chemicals like mercury and uranium.” (Salmon City Post 35). After, “the shale rocks surrounding wells are fractured, methane gas and toxic chemicals flow into nearby ground water.” (Salmon City Post 35). Some studies show that the methane concentrations in drinking water wells are over 17 times higher near fracking sites. (Salmon City Post 35). Among, not only hurting the people, but hurting animals by taking their homes, polluting their water supply, and taking down their food supply.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Argument Essay

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fracking has been a worldwide talk for a couple years on whether it is efficient to get the oil and gas from the Earth or non efficient. A way that it would be non efficient is that it has many negative effects against the Earth. Especially to the environment and people’s health. Many people have taken notes of these effects, and are now nervous or not on board with the concept. A solution that would get people on board with fracking is to make sure that it is done in a clean and efficient way.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fracking Issues

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    No Side – The no side of this debate is led by Deborah Weisberg who argues that fracking causes huge threats to the environment and people. The industry of fracking needs to have stronger regulations to keep water sources from becoming polluted by the chemicals that they are…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Fracking

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As fracking can help get natural gas, it puts harsh chemicals in the air. In the town of Dish is in Texas, there has been toxic chemical brewing in the air from “cracked Barnett Shale more than two kilometers beneath the surface” said David Biello (Scientific American). Also fracking has created water pollution; water pollution is from leaks in wells that are poorly cased. David Biello states that “leaks from badly cased wells contaminated drinking water wells—and one even exploded” which shows that when things are not done properly problems can occur (Scientific American). Since fracking fluid is made up of a high percentage of water, contains many harmful chemicals, and this creates water pollution. “U.S News” confirms that “Water makes up an overwhelmingly high percentage of fracking fluid”, and “about 750 chemicals that have also been used in the process,” which shows why everyone thinks fracking is bad for the environment (is Fracking a Good Idea?). Although fracking has created these types of pollution, it has also helped America’s economy, and saved America a lot of money.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    EPA is a government agency that does research on the impact of fracking on water quality specifically on drinking water. They consider in their report every activity related to water cycle of hydraulic fracturing that may have potential impact on drinking water such as water acquisition, chemical mixing, well injection, produced water handling and wastewater disposal. Based on their research, EPA identified conditions where fracking can be more severe, including: water withdrawal at limited groundwater resources, mishandling of fracking fluid, chemicals and produced water by the industries, and improperly discharge or dispose of wastewater. This report is considered the most complete compilation of data on the relationship between fracking…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ExxonMobil, one of the largest fracking companies in the world, work hard to reduce impacts in the environment and take many precautions to ensure safe water supplies near the wells (Thompson). One study performed by the Environmental Protection Agency proved that though there were a few contaminated wells, the number “was small compared to the number of (fracked) wells,” (“Fracking, with care”). The Groundwater Protection Council from Oklahoma City is a non-profit association for controlling groundwater and underground injection (Howarth, Ingraffea, and Engelder 271).The GPC have performed several studies, and have found that all regulations in the state were effective, and out of 10,000 complaints, one complaint had real problems with contamination, and its cause was unrelated to fracking (“Groundwater”). They say that the pressure of methane is reduced during gas production, causing a downward flow of fluids, and that the risk of contamination comes from flow back fluids, which leak into streams or seep into groundwater after reaching the surface (Howarth, Ingraffea, and Engelder 271). Water that flows back to the surface is treated for safe disposal (Howarth, Ingraffea, and Engelder 271). The fracking industry is beginning to recycle the dangerous fluids used, and all causes of contamination can be fixed or prevented (Howarth, Ingraffea, Engelder…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays