Preview

South America’s governments have long been run by military oligarchies. Did this benefit South America?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2325 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
South America’s governments have long been run by military oligarchies. Did this benefit South America?
South America’s governments have long been run by military oligarchies. Did this benefit South America? Most South American countries were overthrown by the military and have long been ruled by the military to this very day. An oligarchy is understood as rule by the few, in this case, that few would be the military. Under these regimes, citizens enjoyed few if any civil liberties. With the military taking over, South American countries had developed arrangements for governing that allowed both liberal civilian elites to establish order while also limiting political participation. What started off as an initiative to restore order has now begun to show its true colors. If one were to place the pros and cons on different sides of a balance, which one would outweigh the other: the good or the bad? While a military oligarchy was a saving grace from anarchy and a more reasonable path than dictatorship, one may begin to question the benefits of this type of government in South America. It is also logical for one to say that this military rule has yet to prove beneficial.
In order to understand the advantages and disadvantages, one must fully understand what an oligarchy is exactly. Oligarchy is the most common form of government in all of history and also the most common today. The word "oligarchy" comes from the Greek words olígos, meaning "few," and archo, meaning "to rule". By definition, an oligarchy is a form of government where most political power effectively rests with a small segment of society. Oligarchy is not always a rule by wealth, but more or so a rule by the elite in society. These “few” are typically the most powerful, whether by wealth, military strength, ruthlessness, or political influence.
If an oligarchy is rule by the few, what is a “military oligarchy”? Simply put, a military oligarchy is government controlled by the military. What makes it a military oligarchy is that a military is considered the “few”, being that the military is a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    5) How much has Latin America institutions and patterns of politics changed? Page Ref: 774…

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtney Works

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Type of Government |Advantages |Disadvantages |Picture Example | | |An advantage is that |A disadvantage can be if the |[pic] | |Representative Democracy |the people are usually |rights of the minority are not | | |(Presidential) |behind most of the |protected against the will of | | |Definition: |things the government |the majority. | | |A representative |does, because in theory| | | |democracy would be a |it has the support of | | | |government where people |the majority. | | | |would elect their leaders| | | | |and the leaders in power | | | | |would have the power to | | | | |rule and make laws. | | |…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Summary

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages

    31. Oligarchy: Form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small segment of society distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, corporate, or military…

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oligarchy by Alyssa Raulerson An oligarchy is a form of government where a small group of people rule. Oligarchy originates from Medieval Latin and Greek. Some examples of oligarchies include Sparta and modern-day Africa in the twentieth century. It is easy to see since the South African form of oligarchy was based on race. There are many forms of oligarchy, used all around the world.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. In Brazil a coup in 1964 brought in a military government whose combination of dictatorship, use of death squads to eliminate opposition, and use of tax and tariff policies to encourage industrialization through import substitution came to be known as the “Brazilian Solution.” Elements of the “Brazilian Solution” were applied in Chile byte government of Augusto Pinochet, whose CIA-assisted coup overthrew the socialist Allende government in 1973 and in Argentina by a military regime that seized power in1974.…

    • 2244 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The entire book centers on a single recurring theme: the foolishness of a democracy supporting dictators. Roorda maintains that “the dependence on dictators to attain the traditional U.S. goals of stability and cooperation in Latin America meant having to ignore those instances when the strongmen themselves incited unrest and conflict” (146-147). The U.S. military is partly to blame, since it trained Trujillo and treated him as a favored protégé, while diplomats saw through the dictator’s pageantry and disapproved of his methods (Trujillo returned their contempt). Roorda places heavy blame on the Roosevelt administration for allowing Trujillo to remain in power for the simple reason that Trujillo represented stability (even though his conduct at home and his occasional bloody attacks against neighboring Haiti disrupted Dominican-American relations). Roorda describes U.S. logic with Trujillo as “Dominican stability made him practical to deal with,” even if that meant not questioning the ethics of backing brutal regimes that did not threaten American dominance or prosperity.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The expansive empires of the Aztecs and Incas, came crashing down, upon the arrival of Spaniards in the New World. The birth of colonial nations came about in the same stride that death came to indigenous populations. Modern Latin America has conflict built into its system because that is what it has mostly seen for the past five hundred years. In Born in Blood and Fire: A Concise History of Latin America, John Charles Chasteen supports the argument that Latin America's problems developed due to its violent origins and history of conquest. From the conquest, through colonialism and revolutions, to modern day, violence has always been a main player in the advancement of Latin America. Chasteen has left me with a greater comprehension of our neighbors' history and our influence in its maturation from colonial seed to what we have today.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    group of people from getting too much power? A tyranny is a power held by…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How does Chile transition from democracy to a brutal 17 year dictatorship in one day? Some scholars argue that the end of democracy was a result of international interference from countries such as the United States and Cuba. Others insist that the abuse of authority and democratic process was the cause. Even though these are sound arguments, I do not believe that these claims go far back enough in Chile’s history to find the beginning of the problem. In this paper I argue that the breakdown of democracy in Chile was the result of low levels of economic development caused by colonial dependency. The dependency of Chile on the international market led to high rates of class inequality that resulted in radical reforms which created resistance from the elite class, enabling Pinochet…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thirteen Colonies

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    7. What is the long-term significance for Latin America of the “immorality” achieved by the…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the Cold War the United States considered the installation in Latin America of radical regimes-socialist, Marxist-Leninist, or "leftist" in any way- to be utterly intolerable. Any such development would represent an advance for the communist cause and a vital loss for the West. Acceptance of this outcome could weaken the credibility of the United States as the leader of the west and as a rival for the USSR. In the eyes of Cold Warriors, the consolidation of any left-wing regime in the Western Hemisphere would have dire and perilous implications for U.S. national security and for the global distribution of power. It was therefore crucial to resist this possibility by any means necessary in countries such as Grenada, El Salvador, and Nicaragua.…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guatemalan Genocide

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages

    From the majestic words of the brilliant Philoshope John Locke, a governmental system has the obligation to provide and work for the people, in either a direct or indirect matter. The system should satisfy and benefit the citizen in every possible aspect, rather than preventing the forward advancement of a nation’s people. Locke believed that the power of government should be controlled by the governed, and if the government fails to preserve the rights of the people, the power should be stripped away and the governed have the given right to overthrow the existing government. Although this principal is democratic in nature, it is a key factor in the relationship between the government and the governed of any given nation. In many Latin American countries, a strong central government has always been the most common form of administration. The government, regardless of being a democratic or a socialist one, manages and controls the majority if not all of the aspects of the country such as the regulation commerce, the distribution of natural resources, the overall management of the banking systems and the department of agriculture. This makes the country much more subjective to corruption and an unbalance of power with in its own system because the government has so much influence and control within the nation that it almost forms a political or social “monopoly”, in which there is no higher authority to regulate or police what, and in what way different aspects of…

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    e.g.: If person A has political power over B, then A is able to motivate, inspire, incite,…

    • 3430 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Iron Law of Oligarchy: theory in political science stating that an elite is inevitable in any social organization, of any size, whether family, club, union, business, or society as a whole (there must be elites in any style of government or society…there needs to be control and we can’t have all the millions of people deciding what laws are good for us)…

    • 3542 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A small group of noblemen led the government in an aristocracy. This was after the monarchies died out. Aristocracy is what is known as to be ruled by few. Overtime they eventually became an oligarchy. This is when rich citizens not of a noble birth were also allowed to participate. They did not offer citizens a say in their government and could also be as harsh and corrupt. A minority of men from rich families controlled the state. Sparta was one of the last with a successful oligarchy.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays