Silk Air Case
Silk Air Case:
Formed in the year of 1976, originally as a charter company, Silk air is a wholly owned subsidiary of Singapore Airlines. Now Silk Air operates for 38 international destinations in 11 countries.
In my point of view, Silk air has a major flaw in its organizational structure. The original structure comprises of total six components including the top managerial department.(refer to Appendix 1). The rationale for this is explained as that most of the operations are handled by Singapore Airlines in terms of marketing, and most of the HR and Planning is a part of Singapore Airlines’ concerns.
The original structure consists of a CEO as the top managerial department, which is shared by Singapore Airlines. Then moving down to Operations, Chief Pilot, Sales, Finance and HR and Service, Quality & Engineering handled by the one department. The major disadvantage of this structure is that the main components of the service industry are the part of one department. As given in the case, one of the major issues is the increasing number of complaints about poor staff service at help desk and check-in; the service quality department should be separated and the issue should be given more focused attention. Increasing number of complaints about flights either overbooked or delay or ‘no-show’ by passengers, is the concern of sales department. The proper allocation of passengers and communications should be divided into 2 sub-departments. Another issue which was mentioned in the case was that the reduction of cleaning of aircraft after every flight. This is another disadvantage of putting service, quality and engineering into the same department. Tasks are not given individualized attention which as a result affects the overall service quality of the airline. The last and the most concerned issue these days is the extending payments of the suppliers. Businesses these days extend the payments to maintain the cash flow of the company as it is the easiest methods
Formed in the year of 1976, originally as a charter company, Silk air is a wholly owned subsidiary of Singapore Airlines. Now Silk Air operates for 38 international destinations in 11 countries.
In my point of view, Silk air has a major flaw in its organizational structure. The original structure comprises of total six components including the top managerial department.(refer to Appendix 1). The rationale for this is explained as that most of the operations are handled by Singapore Airlines in terms of marketing, and most of the HR and Planning is a part of Singapore Airlines’ concerns.
The original structure consists of a CEO as the top managerial department, which is shared by Singapore Airlines. Then moving down to Operations, Chief Pilot, Sales, Finance and HR and Service, Quality & Engineering handled by the one department. The major disadvantage of this structure is that the main components of the service industry are the part of one department. As given in the case, one of the major issues is the increasing number of complaints about poor staff service at help desk and check-in; the service quality department should be separated and the issue should be given more focused attention. Increasing number of complaints about flights either overbooked or delay or ‘no-show’ by passengers, is the concern of sales department. The proper allocation of passengers and communications should be divided into 2 sub-departments. Another issue which was mentioned in the case was that the reduction of cleaning of aircraft after every flight. This is another disadvantage of putting service, quality and engineering into the same department. Tasks are not given individualized attention which as a result affects the overall service quality of the airline. The last and the most concerned issue these days is the extending payments of the suppliers. Businesses these days extend the payments to maintain the cash flow of the company as it is the easiest methods