Preview

Rene Descartes Meditations On Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1135 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Meditations On Philosophy
In Rene Descartes’ Meditations on Philosophy, he attempts to prove the existence of God, by lowering things to the most basic truths that can be known. He wishes to prove God’s existence beyond any doubt, so he lays out everything that cannot be proven, in order to get to what can be proven beyond doubt. However, his initial doubts end up disproving the argument he is trying to make. He rightly believes that nearly everything people experience throughout their lives can be doubted, but then tries to use this as evidence for God, which disproves his own point. He ends up saying that God can be proven to be real, but it is impossible to say for sure because of the doubt he has already laid out. He is right to say that almost everything can be …show more content…
After establishing that basically everything can be doubted, he states that the idea of God could not have come from humans because people cannot create the idea of something infinite; so, it had to come from somewhere else. He uses this as proof for God’s existence, but it seems to be incorrect. Being able to create the idea of an infinite thing should not be beyond a human’s ability, and being able to would not make people infinite beings as he believes. There is no real reason as to why people should not be able to imagine something all powerful. For example, if people were truly not able to create an infinite being in their imagination, what is to stop an evil demon from doing so. Surely that being would be able to deceive humans into believing in some sort of all good and all-powerful God if it wanted to. Descartes earlier arguments for why things can be doubted are able to cast doubt on the rest of his argument. Furthermore, did Descartes or someone else not come up with the idea of this evil demon which is seemingly an infinite being? Somebody clearly has to have come up with this idea, …show more content…
For instance, one of the reasons that material objects most likely exist is that God would not deceive us on this idea. Since God cannot be known of for sure, the idea of material objects cannot be proven in this way. Descartes is essentially saying that God could create material objects and would not deceive people so they must be real. However, this method would serve as proof for everything in the world, but because of the doubts he has already laid out, it cannot be proven for sure. This leads to his argument for the mind being independent from the body, as he uses the perfect God he has explained in his argument. Descartes uses the existence of the God he has previously explained to say that God can make things to be independent from each other, and reality is distinct from the body, therefore the mind can exist independent from the body. Regardless of the previous doubts of God, it still seems impossible to say that the mind exists without a body, because there needs to be a brain to be able to process thought and think. Therefore, one needs both a body and some sort of processing structure to be able to have thought. Without a properly working brain people cannot correctly think, so the mind and body are not independent. Also, there is already doubt on the existence of God, which hurts this part of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With 1.6 billion over weight adults, and 400 million obese, it is imperative to know what is in the fast food that is consumed today. McDonalds and Burger King both serves the Grilled Chicken Caesar Salad, the Ranch Grilled Chicken Wraps, and the Classic Grilled Chicken Sandwich. This paper will compare the nutritional value of McDonald’s and Burger King.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes discovered his first indubitable truth is that he, himself, did exist. He used his methods of doubt to discount anything he thought he knew previously. He doubted everything his senses had told him because, according to Descartes, what he may have seen or heard might not necessarily be real. He also was not convinced that what he did in his waking life could have been while he was dreaming and, therefore, might also be false. By discarding everything based on the senses, mental imagery and by questioning the existence of God, he was able to start with a blank slate on which to prove his idea. His method of inquiry was knowledge based on certainty. Once he was satisfied that it was certain beyond any doubt, he came to his first indubitable truth, that he existed.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes proves that God exists in his third meditation. He proves that God exists because he wants to be certain about things outside of himself. But, he cannot be certain of these things if he is ignorant about the existence of God. This is because if a supreme God exists, he could cause Descartes to be mistaken in the one avenue to certainty that he has. This avenue is known as clear and distinct perception, and, according to Descartes, it is what is necessary to be certain about a thing. However, a supreme God could easily be deceiving him even when he thinks he is correct as a result of this clear and distinct perception. This is known as the metaphysical doubt. Therefore, to remove this basis for doubt, it is important to Descartes to establish whether this supreme God is capable of deceiving him. But first, he must establish whether this God exists.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes conclusion on premise 6 about God’s existence argues that the clear and distinct perceptions provide the foundation or basis for the truth of our beliefs and that is so because God, who is not a deceiver would not allow Descartes to be mistaken about that which he clearlyl and distinctly perceives. His notion of clear and distinct perceptions and their truth requires God’s existence.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Meditation I, Descartes reflects on his past beliefs and realizes how so much that he once believed to be true was actually false. To separate what is truth from fiction; Descartes decided to completely reject anything which he can doubt at all. He wrote, “If I am able to find in each some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes 4). The belief that inspired this method was that genuine truth was clear and distinct and that any doubt whatsoever could not provide absolute certainty. In essence, if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. This method led Descartes to doubt practically everything he once believed, especially knowledge attained through the senses. He wrote, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this sense, God is perfect, and would never allow deception and error to take place because they are imperfect and God consists only of perfect qualities. God would not allow one to be deceived because he is supremely good, therefore deception and error must be a result of another source. He says that if his origin is from something other than God, he could have easily created him so that he makes mistakes and until he finds his origin doubt is going to occue. Descartes supposes that God is just a tale so he says let us just fraction him out of the equation entirely. Descartes decides that he is just going to doubt everything based on two principles. The first being that everything should be doubted at some point by those who seek the truth and the second being that things that are considered doubtful should be treated as if they are false. With that in mind he concludes that he does exist even against all doubts because the Evil Genius can never say that Descartes is non-existent because he thinks he is something therefore he must be. I think, therefore I…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, Descartes in the third meditation sets out to prove that God does indeed exist. To begin with, he considered that the source of an idea must be as real as the idea itself. He thought that since his idea of God had overwhelmingly unlimited content, then the one who caused the idea must be infinite and that it must be god, and thus asserted that what is more perfect cannot arise from what is imperfect. In his conclusion, Descartes says that God is a substance that is omnipotent, omniscient, independent and infinite. He argued that if the objective reality of an idea could not come from him, then it could have come from something else. The basis for the arguments he put forward lies in the…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By establishing the existence of God, Descartes enables himself to argue that any idea that is clear and distinct to us is innate and completely trustworthy (36). It seems that Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is a replica of his argument for his own existence: I have an idea of myself; therefore, I exist; and, I have an idea of God; therefore, God exists. One might wish to resist the argument because, as Nagel points out, the way that Descartes goes about arguing, starting from the idea of God to the existence of God, implies that the idea of perfection cannot be caused by a less-than-perfect source (36). This is what is known as the causal principle, and as Nagel mentions, it is an appeal that many readers do not find completely convincing…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Micaela Ceraso PHIL 101 Professor Papa December 9th 2014 Topic 3: The Certainty that God Is After reading the two paragraphs written by scholars I have come to three different conclusions. The author of the first argument claims that God does in fact exist and he is also infinite. The author of the second argument claims that humans are not capable of comprehending the idea of infinite, therefore we cannot argue that God is infinite or that he exists at all. Finally, Descartes claims that by The Method of Doubt, God is the one idea that cannot be doubted. Therefore, the disputed question in these three arguments is the existence of God and the idea of infinite.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Meditations, Descartes successfully establishes methodical doubt about math and all sensory information, however, his answer to the doubt cast by the Evil Demon ploy does not fully relieve the dilemma of skepticism that his intense application of doubt has brought forth. Ultimately, Descartes is unable to satisfactorily answer the Evil Demon doubt because his argument does not prove that God’s existence would not prevent the serious errors in judgment and perception caused by the Evil Demon doubt.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, while you can doubt composite things, you cannot doubt simple things. Descartes builds upon this conclusion that composite things can be doubted but not simple things, with the argument of an evil demon deceiving you to conclude that all things must be doubted. This one works that you can only truly know something if you can know for certain that an evil demon, God, or some deceiver with ultimate power isn’t deceiving you about that thing. However, you cannot be certain that this demon is not deceiving you.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes argument for the existence of God is based on two main principles. This is the principle of sufficient reasoning and the principle of adequate reality. The principle of sufficient reasoning means that everything has a cause. The principle of adequate reality is followed by sufficient reasoning and means that there must be at least as much reality in the cause as the effect.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The logic behind Descartes’ second premise can be explained thus, he says a cold object such as a pot of water cannot become hot unless something else causes that heat. But, the cause must have a high degree as the effect. For it is impossible for one level of reality (the boiling water) to be produced by a cause that is less than the effect (a cold stove). Just as heated water is an effect that requires a cause, so Descartes’ idea of an infinite and perfect being is an effect or a phenomenon that needs to be accounted for. It is possible that Descartes could have produced the idea of God himself. But for him, a finite object can only produce another finite object. Hence, Descartes says ordinarily, the idea in his mind does not tell him if there is the existence of any external reality. However, the idea of perfection is unique. If he could not have manufactured it himself, then it will necessarily follow that he is not alone in the world, but that some other thing which is the cause of this idea exist. That thing can only be God therefore, God…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existence of God must be tested the same way as Descartes was examining material things. The way that Descartes did this was by differentiating what essence and existence is. The idea of a thing is its essence and the thing itself is the actual existence. Going back to the triangle example, Descartes stated that just like a triangle has fundamental properties that make it a triangle, so does God. One of the key properties that God has is eternal existence. This means that God exists independently of the finite thinking mind. By using this logic, if God did not exist then God would not hold this property. Therefore, God exists based on the support of his geometrical reasoning. God’s essence and existence are one and the same and cannot be separated just like the fundamental fact that two right angles equal three angles cannot be removed from the essence of a…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays