Preview

Descartes Fifth Meditation Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Fifth Meditation Analysis
The fifth meditation starts off by Descartes straying away from meditating on the aspects of himself and God and compelling himself to focus on what he was pondering on a few days ago: material things. But before Descartes tries to reason if material things outside himself exist, he must first make sure material things can be definite outside his thoughts without being subjected to doubtfulness. Other than that, anything outside these parameters has to be omitted and seen as distractions from what he is trying to ponder on. He has to understand the difference between the material things that are definite and the material things that are ambiguous or bring about doubt and being deceived through the senses. Descartes first has to audit his …show more content…
The existence of God must be tested the same way as Descartes was examining material things. The way that Descartes did this was by differentiating what essence and existence is. The idea of a thing is its essence and the thing itself is the actual existence. Going back to the triangle example, Descartes stated that just like a triangle has fundamental properties that make it a triangle, so does God. One of the key properties that God has is eternal existence. This means that God exists independently of the finite thinking mind. By using this logic, if God did not exist then God would not hold this property. Therefore, God exists based on the support of his geometrical reasoning. God’s essence and existence are one and the same and cannot be separated just like the fundamental fact that two right angles equal three angles cannot be removed from the essence of a …show more content…
The objection is one that discusses how God may not even exist and that his essence is different from his existence. Descartes used the metaphor of a valley and mountain and how they are connected by having ascending and descending slope. Valleys lead into mountains and then back to valleys. Even though this valley and the mountain show the connection, there is not any proof of this valley existing. Descartes counters this objection by saying that we can very easily imagine a horse with or without wings or a mountain without a valley, but we cannot imagine God without him existing. The other objection that someone would make about Descartes logic and reasoning would be that God’s existence would never come into play if we never thought about his existence in the first place. Descartes replies by saying that by thinking of beings greater than ourselves ultimately leads us to thinking of God. In other words, God is legitimate whether we think about his existence or not. We ultimately are compelled to end up at this idea. In conclusion, Descartes deduced that every science that is studied is based and rests upon the knowledge of the one true God. Descartes mentions that before becoming aware of God, he was unable to attain certain and true knowledge about anything else. Now that Descartes has proven, through his logic, about material things existing outside of thoughts and God’s existence, it is possible for him

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Throughout Meditation One in The Meditation of the First Philosophy, Descartes reflects on a number of falsehoods he has believed throughout his life. He does this to create a system in order to clarify whether they are true or false, so that he can build a basic structure from which future knowledge can be based. This approach is called Method of Doubt. Doubt is defined as a feeling of uncertainty. Descartes opens Mediation One by stating that if he wants to establish information that is firm and lasting in the sciences, he would have to begin from the earliest foundations from which his current knowledge has been built upon. He establishes that the task includes breaking down the components that make up his general knowledge.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Meditator is alone, no trees, no people, no oceans, no mountains, no earth, no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”, Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God, people would have created themselves. If this were to be true, everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects to allow humans to think. This human ability to think allows them to exist. If nothing else were to exist and the Meditator was alone in the universe then he could not think and without thought,…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This gives an insight into why Descartes relies so heavily on the God in his meditations. It seems he uses God to support his meditations and uses God as a solution to his philosophy of doubt. God is vital as he is the answer to Descartes’ most complex ideas on doubt and enables him to preach God’s ability to relieve us of doubt but further more he want to reveal to us that God is the reason for all matter , for our…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes casts everything into doubt in the first meditation, including God Himself. He then comes to this disproval of this theory therefore concluding that God exists. This is brought about through the causal argument.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Now that I have had a chance to review my original essay, I’ve determined that my arguments for Descartes’ logic being circular were unclear because I believed something different from what I believe now. Though this revision will still address the same concepts from the Meditations as my previous essay, I will argue instead that Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is not guilty of circular logic but merely has the illusion of such. Descartes’ belief system for the existence of God consists of claims that seem to presuppose one another in defending their conclusions of each other, but instead, each follow from the Cogito as first principles.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Paper

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes establishes that in order to know what in fact exists, one must first take everything off the table and then see what can be put back. The conclusion is that in order to be certain that one is a thinking thing; one must know what it takes to be certain. “All those things I perceive very clearly and very distinctly are true”(Pg. 53). This general rule however, requires that all doubt must be removed. This can only be done if God both exists and is not a deceiver. Descartes then breaks substances down into those that have objective reality and those with formal reality. It is clear that the idea of God must have more objective reality than formal reality. However, the idea itself is so great that Descartes believes that he could not have come up with it by himself. Since he himself is a finite substance, it is assumed that something infinite would be the only thing that could envision the idea of the infinite in the first place. Therefore, God must exist and cannot be a deceiver because he would not allow Descartes to not be able to clearly and distinctly perceive. This argument then rests on Descartes proof of the existence of God, which can only be erroneous if Descartes clarity and distinctness rule is incorrect. Since the argument of God is used for the validation of the clarity and distinctness rule, and the rule itself implicitly must prove that God exists, the Cartesian circle is created. For an argument to be circular, one of the premises must be reliant upon the conclusion for its truth. If you touch on one argument, you touch on both. There are a few ways out of the circle.…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, Descartes in the third meditation sets out to prove that God does indeed exist. To begin with, he considered that the source of an idea must be as real as the idea itself. He thought that since his idea of God had overwhelmingly unlimited content, then the one who caused the idea must be infinite and that it must be god, and thus asserted that what is more perfect cannot arise from what is imperfect. In his conclusion, Descartes says that God is a substance that is omnipotent, omniscient, independent and infinite. He argued that if the objective reality of an idea could not come from him, then it could have come from something else. The basis for the arguments he put forward lies in the…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basis of Descartes proof that God exists is in the nature of ideas. What is the nature of ideas? To explain what they are, Descartes splits ideas into two categories. The first group of ideas is like the images of things, for example, a man, or an angel. These ideas are basic, and are not truth apt. What that means is that they are neither true nor false. For example, if I am having an idea of an angel, it doesn’t seem sensible to ask, “is that idea you are having of an angel true or false?”, because it can never be less true that I am in fact imagining the angel. The main point is that these ideas do not have a truth value. However, other ideas are capable of being true or false. For these ideas, they are connected to the outside World in a way that involves a claim. For example, if I claimed, “this ball is red”, this claim could be true or false because the ball could in fact be red, or I could be mistaken! This second group of ideas is known as judgments, and judgments are truth apt. Descartes says that to remove this possibility for falsity in judgments, ideas should be taken simply as modes of…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophers abroad have sought out potential solutions on behalf of Descartes over the past year by almost “borrowing” various ideas he has mentioned throughout his writings, but one in particular seems very interesting for decent solution to this argument. His second set of answers or Replies to more objections Descartes brings up the topic of atheism and how they can know that three angles of a triangle are equal to two right angles (Pynn 2011). The nonbelief in God shows that God’s existence may be irrelevant and Descartes may have an issue. Descartes claims that an atheist can be clearly aware that the basics of geometry and the three angles of a triangle equaling two right angles. Therefore he states, “This awareness of his is not true knowledge since no act of awareness that can be rendered doubtful seems fit to be called knowledge.” (Pynn). He (Descartes) wants to be able to come up with a true…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his powerful philosophical treatise, “Meditations on First Philosophy: Meditation II”, Descartes remains persistent in his argument concerning doubt. Descartes expresses the probability that the knowledge concerning external things is possibly invalid due to the consequences caused by the actions of a wicked demon. Descartes continues to pursue along with his argument by stating that some things that must be true is his existence and his nature as a thinking man. Descartes declares that his body is more easily apparent though his mind then through his actual body. For Descartes to better explain his statement, he compares his statement to a piece of wax in an effort to make it easier to understand. Descartes melts the wax to demonstrate…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’s overall goal in Meditation one is to find certainty in a world full of deceit. To do this, he demolishes all of his prior knowledge to the foundations and rebuild. He is searching for one principle in life to be completely true no matter what. He is looking for that one certainty, that is free of any skepticism. Skepticism is like a nagging voice in the back of one’s mind, always telling them to doubt and question, to find everything that could be considered false. It makes one question even the simplest of things. Descartes uses two parts of his personality, Hopeful and Doubtful, to show his opinion of scepticism. Hopeful remains positive despite any evidence that contradicts what it thinks. And Doubtful is the side of his mind that finds any and every way something could be a lie, In an attempt to find an absolute…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes also used an analogy of a mountain; he said that the existence of God is part of the essence of God, like a valley is part of the essence of a mountain. He recognised that this had its limitations, while we might be able to think of a mountain without thinking of a valley additionally, this does not mean the combination in our imagination actually exists in the real world. However, Descartes argued that his nature does not involve angles or valleys but perfections; therefore existence is a perfection because God has all the perfections, and existence…

    • 641 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes, a French philosopher and naturalistic scientist, believed that material things do exist. Through his imagination and senses, Descartes makes a connection between material things and mathematics. In paragraphs 2 and 3, he clearly separates the idea of imagining and understanding. Imagination is not necessarily an important feature to have because we can still exist without it. Descartes links this with the body, as the individuals’ mind turns outward. While as for understanding, we reflect…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays