Preview

Plan Germany A Parliamentary Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
531 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plan Germany A Parliamentary Democracy
Plan; To what extent was Germany a parliamentary democracy in the years 1900-14?

Agree

It practiced universal male suffrage for those over 25 years old who voted for the Reichstag. Done through use of secret ballot so people could cast their votes without fear of being persecuted for their choice.
The people voted for the Reichstag, and the Reichstag had the power to pass an annual budget, and it had control over the defence budget. Although the Kaiser could dissolve the Reichstag, it couldn’t be dismissed indefinitely and had the right to hold elections straight after dissolution.
Power of Reichstag made clear through Daily Telegraph affair 1908. Shows they had power as Bulow ended up losing his role as chancellor as he failed to censor the interview in which the Kaiser expressed desires for an alliance with Britain. Shows the Kaiser could not displease the Reichstag.
Turn out of the Reichstag elections increased from 50% in 1871 to nearly 85% in 1912 – the German people had realised that it was important, no longer viewed it as a meaningless institution.
Signs of constitutional change, as a constitution was granted to Alsace Lorraine in 1911.
In 1912, the Social Democrats were able to become the largest party in the Reichstag. (?)
Men of all classes were allowed a vote, meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented.
German citizens enjoyed civil liberties as a Rechtsstaat: the freedom of expression, of press, and of assembly.

Disagree

The Bundesrat was flawed, as it could veto legislation if 14 members voted against a bill. Prussia had 17 of the 58 seats, and so this ensured Prussian dominance in the passing of legislation.
The federal structure was unfair and undemocratic.
The voting system was divided into a “three class franchise”, which meant that votes of those who paid more tax counted for those who paid less. The lowest group of voters made up around 92% of the electorate. This meant that Prussian Chamber of Deputies

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The use of legislation was very important to the Nazis and their consolidation of power, and was a key tool for the Nazi’s to make there actions legal and justifiable. This way of legalising what other wise would have been deemed illegal and immoral ways of running a political party and government. This meant they could keep the balance of a respectful government and ruthless power driven party well.…

    • 922 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was a parliamentary democracy based on the constitution that Germany was run by. The Bundesrat being part of the constitution consisted of 58 members who were elected by the state assemblies, the Bundesrat had the power in theory to the law making process and by this having this possibly the right to alter the constitution. The Bundesrat had the power to veto legislation against a bill, therefore being able to stop such laws that would not be in favour of Germany. As well as this, the Bundesrat and the Reichstag had joint legislative power. The Reichstag was elected members represented by constituencies and were all male over the age of twenty five. One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a democracy is that Bismark introduced universal male suffrage elections in 1871. This is clearly an example of a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote; meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented. However importantly over the Bundesrat the Reichstag was significantly in power of the financial affairs and the banking system of Germany and perhaps most importantly the control the Reichstag had over the defence budget which was vital federal government expenditure. It had grown from being 100 million marks in 1890 to rapidly increasing to 2,405 million marks by 1913. Although the Kaiser did have the right to dissolve the Reichstag they still could hold elections after this. Furthermore the constitution was based on parliamentary democracy to an extent because members were elected into their positions. They held the power of money that…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 28 Outline

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages

    xlviii) In France, the democratically elected government rested in the hands of the middleclassoriented moderates, while communists and socialists battled for the support of the workers.…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The narrowing of the division of political parties is also apparent, as although there was opposition it was minimal. This is shown, as in August 1914, 14 out of the 110 socialists in the Reichstag argued against the war,…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The end of the Great War had forced the Kaiser to abdicate to Holland and brought an end to the Germany’s Imperial government. The Weimer Republic had emerged from the Revolution. The new democratic government had been forced upon by the Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty of Versailles also disbanded the German Air force and reduced its army and navy, loss of territories, reparations, Germany was forbidden to unite with Austria and were to take the blame.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period 1900-1914, Germany’s political landscape witnessed extraordinary changes in which typical features associated with a parliamentary democracy- such as significant and influential pressure group activity and universal suffrage- were present. It can however be argued that this period also represented a time in which the German Reichstag did not truly represent the population due to old and corrupt voting system for Prussia which saw votes unfairly given and the role of all the chancellors- in particular Von Bulow- during this time, which saw unelected officials yielding greater influence than that of the Reichstag. Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the many contrasting features of the political system. Germany may have had many features where a “parliamentary democracy” can be boasted, but there are also just as many contrasting points which expose the system as being corrupt and broken.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution gave Wilhelm the right to conduct foreign policy and personally deal with military affairs. By controlling foreign policy, the Kaiser had the right to declare and conclude war, make treaties and form alliances. This essentially, ensured that the Kaiser always had 50% of rule. Wilhelm, having a passion for militarism used this to his advantage and in the process used his chancellor’s as well. The Zabern affair in 1913 defined the divide between the Kaiser and the Reichstag. The immediate cause of the clash occurred when German soldiers insulted national feelings of the people of Alsace. In response to repressive measures taken by the military authorities against the angry citizens of Zabern, protest demonstrations were held in Alsace. Regardless of a national outcry against militarism, Wilhelm condoned the action. The Reichstag was furious but Hollweg refused to side with them and supported the Kaiser and the military. This shows that the Kaiser did have personal rule as he controlled his chancellor…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck was successful in political control over Germany as he had created a new constitution which benefitted and suited his needs as chancellor as he had created an autocratic constitution which revolved around the Kaiser and himself. Bismarck’s success was due to numerous factors such as control over the Reichstag as Bismarck had manipulated the Reichstag so that he would be supported by the party with the majority. Thus proving that Bismarck’s political prowess was a force to be reckoned, with as he successfully and tactically negotiated deals which saw him “jumping into bed with the enemy”, meaning that Bismarck would remain the figurehead for political power ensuring a pre-eminent position for Prussia this is proven as 17/58 representatives in the Bundesrat were Prussian nationals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the period of the second Reich, the Kaiser managed to keep a huge amount of power within it. With the ability to dismiss the chancellor and the Reichstag, it can be seen that the Kaiser could manipulate the governing powers until they became a united power which had the same views as him. However, it can be argued that this power that the Kaiser had could not be used freely, as he was limited by how popular he was with both the population and the army. It was this constraint of popularity which meant that the Kaiser had to control what he did in order to keep both the army and the people on his side, meaning that he didn’t have absolute personal rule.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Second Reich constitution, it is clear that during the years of the Second Reich there was no democracy. The German Electorates could only elect the Reichstag, which had little power. The Reichstag was only able to accept or reject the laws that were proposed by the government and veto treaties agreed by the Kaiser. However, the Kaiser was able to summon and dissolve the Reichstag at any given time. Therefore most of the time the Reichstag would agree with Kaiser, which shows Kaiser Absolutism. This was similar for the Imperial Government. The Chancellor and the Cabinet did the day-to-day running of the Germany. However, at any given time the German Emperor was able to dismiss the Chancellor. Therefore at the end if something was not going according to Kaisers' vision for Germany he has the power to change so.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another point would be that only the Kaiser (Emperor) could dismiss the government. He could not just dismiss it he could dissolved the parliament (Reichstag) if the plans did not go to his way, this resulted in no democracy what so ever. But yet many other would respond to this and say that Germany did have political parties which actual people could vote for. For an example in the late 19th century the conservative party had won but yet in the 1912the SPD (Social Democratic Party) won with 110 points. This does show a great form of democracy but not enough to prove that they were as one third of the votes went to the Junkers. There weren`t many Junkers compared to Peasants and it shows the unfairness of their process to brain wash people at the time.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The National Socialist Party came to power through a series of swift, ruthless and devastating actions which firmly established Germany as a fascist state. The centralisation of power in Germany, known as 'co-ordination' (Gleichschaltung), was initiated on the day of the election and was carried out with such clinical efficiency, that the German state was completely transformed within a matter of months.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This could help in breaking what was seen as a corrupt alliance between political party bosses and wealthy people in the business. They steered votes for women thus coming against women suffrage. Women experienced changes during this era than men did. The changes that took place gave women more attention than men. Women had significant part in pushing for progressive reforms.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This was an age of social involvement and political progression in the United States between the period of 1890 and 1920s. The main reason for undergoing this process was to purify the government by making efforts to eliminate corruption by revealing the political masters and machines. A large number of citizens supported the movement to ensure the elimination of the political masters that concentrated in public houses. Women’s suffrage was noticeable that was aimed at ensuring purer women’s participation in the field. The movement began at the local levels and grew up to the national levels. Besides the…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Woman's Suffrage

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Without the right to vote a huge number of citizens would not have had a say based solely on gender and men’s opinions of woman’s intellectual capabilities. Woman were only represented by males; meaning any law could have been passed against females and they would not been able to alter it. Woman also had views and…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics