Paul Ree's Theory Of Choice Essay
Have you wondered if the decisions we made and make were caused by past factors or were just chose by our free will though out our lives? Paul Ree’s explanation to that sums up that free will does not exists, thus, there is no moral responsibility and vice versa. which can be basically translated as having no real choice because every action is predetermined. The concepts of right and wrong are however left behind as well as one's values that play an important role in decisions making, the role of fatalism and finally, the possibility that free will and decisions are not only made from our mind but from out heart.
Paul Ree came with his theory that free will is not real and thus we should not feel morally responsible towards our actions or …show more content…
When we make choices, most of the time we think and analyze with our brain, to choose the best option and act from that option knowing that we another option was still possible to choose. However, there is another of thinking and it is heart thinking. Research showed that the heart has actual neurons working in the heart that makes the organ think for itself. Gregg Braden, literature writer explains how this can be processed; Basically, our heart sends signals to the brain that will reflect the feelings. For instance and according to this research, If I suddenly stand in a position of choice 2 simple steps can be applied to choose it with my heart: Focus on the heart are of the body, breathe slowly and activate a positive feeling. According to BRadden, the answer we are looking for has been there since we were born and he emphasizes the fact that it can be trusted. This approach comes very close to Paul Roe's but in a different angle. Determinism strongly demonstrates that every decision made were caused by a past factor and the heart hold all the answers we actually need to have when we make a decision; Either way, we could think that free will is inexistent especially from Ree’s point, nevertheless, even of the heart gives an absolute truth for the person, he still has the choice to follow it or not and will at the end accept the consequences whatever he takes it or
Paul Ree came with his theory that free will is not real and thus we should not feel morally responsible towards our actions or …show more content…
When we make choices, most of the time we think and analyze with our brain, to choose the best option and act from that option knowing that we another option was still possible to choose. However, there is another of thinking and it is heart thinking. Research showed that the heart has actual neurons working in the heart that makes the organ think for itself. Gregg Braden, literature writer explains how this can be processed; Basically, our heart sends signals to the brain that will reflect the feelings. For instance and according to this research, If I suddenly stand in a position of choice 2 simple steps can be applied to choose it with my heart: Focus on the heart are of the body, breathe slowly and activate a positive feeling. According to BRadden, the answer we are looking for has been there since we were born and he emphasizes the fact that it can be trusted. This approach comes very close to Paul Roe's but in a different angle. Determinism strongly demonstrates that every decision made were caused by a past factor and the heart hold all the answers we actually need to have when we make a decision; Either way, we could think that free will is inexistent especially from Ree’s point, nevertheless, even of the heart gives an absolute truth for the person, he still has the choice to follow it or not and will at the end accept the consequences whatever he takes it or