Preview

God Knows The Ethical Decisions We Will Make Med

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2022 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
God Knows The Ethical Decisions We Will Make Med
“God Knows the Ethical decisions we will make” Discuss [35]

The question over the existence of free will has raged on over many years. Many feel that God, saw an omniscient being, must be aware of all that has happened and all that will happen. Supporters of the cosmological argument would suggest that everything has a cause and that god was the initial cause, “the unmoved mover” (Tomas Aquinus), this would support the idea that humanity has no free will as everything is pre determined. This highlights the idea that humanity is not free, and even when we think we have a choice our actions have already been determined.
Free will is the concept that humanity has the ability to make their own choices, this suggests that humanity has a moral understanding that is inherent and God given. Some people argue that you are born with this morality and it does not develop. Christians would argue that this morality is god given, and that we merely develop it through our upbringing. If Christians accept the concept of God, then it is necessary that they view God as omniscient, this would suggest he knows everything we have done and everything we will do, thus taking away free will. However, many Christians take the view that god gave us free will after he cast Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. In this way moral responsibility can exist and there can be a differentiation between a person who acts morally and immorally because there is now the option of choice.
Libertarians would agree with this idea, suggesting we always have a choice. Christian Libertarians argue that God simply offers moral guidance but allows us to behave in the way we want to. Libertarianism is the theory that humans do have genuine freedom to make a morally undetermined decision, although our behaviour may be partially determined by external factors. Libertarianism is the view that when faced with the choice between right and wrong we do act as free agents. Generally libertarianists

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper, I want to discuss and present the difference between the will ‘of God’ and of man. According to the Encyclopedia, the philosophical meaning of the will is that, will is usually paired with reason. It is considered as the faculty of choice and decision. Whereas the reason is that o fdeli8veration and argument. The rational act would be an exercise o fthe will performed after due deliveration. Likewise, Philosophers have often thought that persons are resposible only for those action which they have the option either to do or not to do or to will or not to will. But, if all acts, including the acts of will, are predetermined, then, this option does not apppear or exist.…

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would lean more towards the compatibilist view stating, unless I am the cause of my actions I am not responsible for them. As compatibilist holds that free will and determinism are compatible, we can properly understand what it means for our actions to be free so we see that a free action is doing what one wants. Believing in compatibilism doesn't mean the determinist view is false, but if it is true, we can still have free will. I believe that we make decisions based on our own desires and beliefs. It is said that compatibilists attempt to revise and weaken the commonsense notion of free will. Thomas Hobbes was the first person to articulate a compatibilist position believing that although the person is free to act on their motive, the motive is determined. In other words, he says “Everything we choose to do is strictly determined by the need to relieve the physical pressures of our bodies. Humans…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    were given a questionnaire to view their “general satisfaction” (Tierney 2). Tierney claimed that people who believe in free will “scored better job ratings” (Tierney 2). This proves that believing in free will can lead to a more ethical society through believing that a person has control on their actions. In other words, a teenager would understand that stealing is wrong; therefore, he knows that it’s his choice to steal. In the back of the teenagers head, he has to think of the consequences. This proves that when a person believes that he has free will, he is more likely to think of…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3) Critically assess the claim that people are free to make moral decisions (35) Libertarians support the view that people have free will and so we are free to make moral decisions. For a Libertarian, the key evidence for this is the act of decision making in our daily lives. Hume states that “experience is what we see to be true”, each human being experiences the feeling of being free to make a decision. If experiencing any other action constitutes it to be true, then why not the same for free will? Libertarians argue that we have awareness of the choices we make; we can choose to do anything that we are capable of. Though we are influenced by our environment and experiences, ultimately we can make our own decisions, nothing is inevitable or determined. Libertarians hold the belief of a moral self; humans want to want to do things. For example, a smoker may think it would be a good idea to give up smoking, but their addiction is too strong for them to think it possible or in any way likely; they want to want to give up smoking. Humans are unique in this way and it is this which is called the moral self. Libertarians are dualists believing that the human mind is separate from the physical world. It is because of this that our reason and autonomy, our moral self, can transcend over other causal determinants. Kant argues that by applying reason to decisions we can escape any authority from cause and effect or desires and emotions, we are the agents of our own decisions. Libertarians believe in a forking path of choices rather than the straight road of determinism.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free will is the term made up of ‘autos’ meaning self and ‘nomos’ meaning rule. Many philosophers such as Kant say that you can only be responsible for actions that you undertake of your own will, this is opposed to Determinism.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant, a soft determinist, said that in order to make a moral decision we must have freedom. Kant believed that the ability to make moral decisions lay within the existence of freedom; stating that if we are not free to make our own decisions those decisions could not be moral as we were never free to make that decision in the first place. Kant thought that a person could be blamed for an action if they could have acted differently; for example if a person’s family is held at gunpoint and they are forced to open a safe they cannot be blamed as they did not have a choice. If we are to have free will we must have the ability to make a decision that is unhindered; Kant believed that we must have free will if we are to be help morally responsible for our actions, if God did not give us free will then our decisions cannot be considered immoral or moral as we would have had to act in the way we did. Thus we cannot be held responsible; a good moral action cannot be praised as you had no other option, whilst an immoral action cannot be punished as once again there was no free choice.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Salvation Debate- Calvinism and Arminianism Calvinism and Arminianism are two different systems of theology that attempt to explain the relationship between God’s sovereignty and man’s free will. What differentiates these views is the issue of free will and whether people have any as compared to God’s will. Some people claim that God’s will supersedes human will in all situations if God’s will is different. On the other hand, some people claim God created man with free will and He would not intervene. However, there are those who do not believe man was created with free will and the sovereignty of God causes everything to occur. The Scripture teaches both the sovereignty of God and the free will of man. It appears unconditional in some places and conditional in other. Although, both systems are based on the Word of God, and both contain truth, neither system can be substituted for reading and believing the Word of God.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Determinism and Sartre

    • 3716 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Determinism and Sartre We do not live our lives in despair, constantly worrying about what may happen unexpectedly. For many people, life does seem like something that we control handedly. Life seems to be something we can direct, or at least influence. Supposing there are circumstances beyond our control, they rarely seem to present us a problem; we live contently believing that we are at least partly responsible for our fates. Seldom do we question the truth in this, of whether or not we have some say in the direction of our lives. Some would argue this is not so. Some of these people would happen to look at a deity or hard sciences to lead us to a cogent determined purpose. The fact remains that whether or not purpose lies in causality, a chain of events full of causes and effects may be explained perfectly if we had the knowledge. Determinists would argue that our free will is simply an illusion and we are deluding ourselves if we believe we have control. Sartre would argue that even the most seemingly random of occurrences are in fact entirely our fault; no matter what we do, who we talk to, and regardless of the circumstances, everything happens because it is our will because in some way or another our choices have allowed the event to happen. Each side of the debate has its merits and each side its flaws. As such, it becomes particularly difficult to choose between one and the other. I think that such a choice is not necessary. Though the choices seem at first to mark a dichotomy, they are in fact quite compatible with the truth of the matter lying somewhere in between. We do have choice; however, this choice is only between limited options, as determined by both the mental and physical worlds.…

    • 3716 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of libertarian free will and its relationship with moral responsibility is a topic of concern to many theists and an issue that has been argued over many times. According to Reason and Responsibility by Joel Feinberg, libertarianism is the theory that free will is not determined or “the result of random chance,” Instead, it is the outcome of rational agency (anything that can make decisions). Personally, I believe in the libertarian view towards the concept of free will and its relation to moral responsibility.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Determinism- Myer Pearlman’s contrast to this view simply states, “The scriptures consistently affirm that man is free to choose between good and evil”. Far from being a victim of fate or chance, man is declared to be the arbiter of his own destiny. English Scholar Dr. Johnson once declared: Sir we know that our wills are free, and that’s the end of it. That ounce of common sense outweighs a ton of philosophy.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free will is the power, attributed to man making free choices that are unconstrained by external forces or by an agency such as destiny or gods will. This is a difficult subject for me as I have broken beliefs pertaining to both. I believe in divine will (if god said it then it shall be done) but I also believe in free will. As man was created in gods image and was given free will, hence my conflict. If it is Gods will for me to be teacher or dish washer in the church. Then avenues will open up for me in that direction I shall without question go that way. This implies determinism or predestines which is a direct contradiction to mans endowment with free…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dualism In Religion

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Free will helps us make day to day decisions without us even knowing it. “man recognizes the voice of God which urges him ‘to do what is good and avoid what is evil.’ Everyone is obliged to follow this law, which makes itself heard in conscience and is fulfilled in the love of God and of neighbor. Living a moral life bears witness to the dignity of the person” (Catechism of the Catholic Church 1706). Free will is a part of our souls that allows us to think like God, in knowing what is right and what is wrong. “Our free will is a clear sign that God is not manipulative; he does not force us to love him. True freedom is a manifestation of the image of God present in every person.” (Singer-Towns 13) We are also given reason which correlates to free will. Reason is the power to understand why something is morally right versus morally wrong. Free will is the ability to chose this. There is a third part of the soul as well. This part is intellect. “Having intellect means that we have the ability to see and understand the order of things that God has established. Our intellect allows us to distinguish between what is truly good and what only appears to be good. Having an intellect means that God has given us the ability to understand how to be in communion with him” (Singer-Towns…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Human beings are responsible for their moral actions. Discuss.” Libertarianism, otherwise known as incompatabilism (the idea that you cannot be free and determined), holds the belief that we are completely free to make moral decisions and that nothing is determined in any way. Therefore, human beings are totally responsible for their moral actions. Some philosophers rejected the idea of determinism because it ruled out any individual, moral responsibility but the question still lies as to whether human beings truly are autonomous or not. It can be argued that free will is simply an illusion and that in fact, absolute free will does not create moral responsibility but rather irresponsibility. Another approach to the problem of moral responsibility is determinism. This holds the belief that human actions are determined to some extent but there are slightly different types of determinism: soft, hard and predestination.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traditionally, God has been conceived as possessing the property of omniscience, or perfect and infinite knowledge. His omniscience covers all events – past, present, and future. However, this presents a potential problem for the argument that humans have free will. If God has knowledge of all future actions performed by agents, then in what sense do agents have genuine choice? If God already knows the outcome of every agent's choice, then it seems that no agents are truly free to make choices other than those that they actually do. Alternatively, if agents are genuinely free then it seems that God cannot have prior knowledge of how they will act. This could threaten the status of God's omniscience. The knowledge of what free agents would do…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The motive of this essay is to emphasis that “THERE ARE LIMITATIONS TO HOW MUCH WE HAVE FREEDOM, BUT, WE DO HAVE SOME FREEDOM OF CHOICES TO CHOOSE FROM”. This essay will focus on three different theories that relates to free will and determinism. These theories consist of hard determinism, soft determinism and indeterminism.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays