Preview

Organizational structures

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1189 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Organizational structures
Organizational Structures - Mechanistic and Organic Structures Podcast Transcript

Speakers: Scott, Dine, Lock Collins

Scott: Hey everybody, welcome! We're going to have a great discussion today about the core components of organizational structures. Namely the mix of centralization and decentralization and how they factor into the two major types of organizations: mechanistic organizations and organic organizations.

Diane: Then we’ll talk about two prime examples of each organization to give you a sense of, not which structure is better, but rather, why a corporation would choose one structure over the other.

Scott: Well, let’s go over decentralization and centralization, because it seems like those are core principles of how corporations are structured.

Diane: They are, and really what it comes down to is: What type of framework does the company want? How do they see managing business operations?

Scott: Does a lot of the decision come down to company size? It would seem to me that smaller companies would have a smaller framework.

Diane: Would it surprise you if I said that often times the reverse is actually true?

Scott: Actually, it would! (laughs). What’s the reason for it?

Diane: Smaller companies are often operating with limited resources, so the business owner has to be more responsible for large decisions. In this way, there is a pyramid effect to management.

Scott: Meaning the top of the pyramid makes the most decisions, and fewer decisions are made as it widens down to the base from there.

Diane: Precisely. Large corporations can’t have just one person making every single decision, especially when we start talking about multi-national corporations. The corporate world is a complex place, and that complexity breeds innovation of management strategies. With that, you get a decentralized model.

Scott: Now obviously, this isn’t the case all the time, correct?

Diane: Exactly. And as a matter of fact, the examples

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    · Describe the organizational structure of your selected organization. Compare and contrast that structure with two different organizational structures.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Based on your learning, identify the market structure that you believe best applies to this organization. Defend your answer. How does that market structure positively and negatively affect the firm? How does the effectiveness of the competitive strategies in the market structure affect the organization’s long-term profitability?…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This file MGT 330 Week 3 Discussion Questions 2 shows solution on this task: "What are the different types of organizational structures? Which type of structure do you feel is the most effective? Why? How can organizations determine if they are structured in the most effective and efficient manner?"…

    • 473 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Memomemomemo

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. We are unsure of how we should organize our business. What are our options? What are the advantages and/or disadvantages for each option?…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An organizational structure is the official arrangement of job, influence, and informing associations (Phillips & Gully, 2014). Centralized and decentralized organizational structures mirror the businesses dissection of its physiognomies at various tiers. A centralized organization focuses power and decision-making at higher tiers of the business, whereas decentralized organization permits lower tiers more power and self-sufficiency for decision making (Phillips & Gully, 2014). The Evo Company would be classified as a decentralized organization. The employees at Evo have not only the power but the tractability to make the decisions regarding the customer’s happiness. The flat structure that encompasses Evo helps encourage improvement and enhances the promptness of making decisions. Evo’s owner Bryce Phillips entrusts obligations to proficient managers at all levels and this company depends on a team environment at all levels to make the company run efficiently and successfully.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An organization’s structure influences the flow of information throughout the firm and determines who reports to whom. In some firms, decision-making powers are concentrated at the upper echelons of the organization, whereas in others, this role is distributed among various management levels in the organization. A lateral organization a structure embraces decentralization whereby various departments work together in order to achieve common organizational goals (Hall, 1972).…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson are the largest and most successful pharmaceutical companies in the world today. Each company has a massive workforce and conducts business in countries all over the globe. Both companies have used a high degree of horizontal differentiation in order to manage their business units more effectively. Operating companies are grouped together by their function, as well as the type of product the produce. There are concerns about the lack of control that results from decentralization. The benefits, however, appear to outweigh the risks, as evidenced by the successes enjoyed by Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. At the end of Part I, how would you describe the organization design of both Omega and Acme? What factors led you to this conclusion?…

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cases Study 4 C

    • 857 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Identify, illustrate and describe the type of structure that best describe the organization, CG…

    • 857 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIMA-SWOT analysis model

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The company’s large operating dimension may as well be a drawback. Because the firm is geographically dispersed, its management is decentralized and wide in scale. In order to response to managerial problems at a more rapid rate, regional headquarters need to be set up. This has inevitably increased the level and width of management, making it harder for the top managers to articulate their thoughts to lower management levels. As a result, the overall management of the whole company may lose effectiveness.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Structure

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bureaucratic structures have a certain degree of standardization. They are better suited for more complex or larger scale organizations. They usually adopt a tall structure. Then tension between bureaucratic structures and non-bureaucratic is echoed in Burns and Stalker[1] distinction between mechanistic and organic structures.…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Matrix Management

    • 1982 Words
    • 9 Pages

    specialisation. This network of interfaces is the matrix and has been seen as an ideal…

    • 1982 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The objective here is to understand why organizations have the structure that they do. By "structure" I mean things like degree and type of horizontal differentiation, vertical differentiation, mechanisms of coordination and control, formalization, and centralization of power. See handouts page for more information on organizational structure.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‎1.1 In this Nucor case, it illustrates that simple organization structure have their limitations. From this case we can ‎see that Nucor only has three levels of management that makes the plant managers report directly to the CEO, and ‎it makes the CEO hard to maintain the company using this simple structure and also hard to make decisions on ‎trade battles. This is happened because the CEO can’t concentrate and focus to his mainly job which is making ‎decisions, with this simple structure he has to maintain the report from the plant managers too. From this case, we ‎can say that simple structure has limitations. When the organization size increases, decision making typically ‎becomes slower and risky because the decision only depend on one person and it makes the information overload ‎at the top management. It is also difficult to maintain in anything other than small organizations.‎…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Larger businesses often have wide and well-defined structures wherein each employee has a specific operational role.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays