Preview

Organizational Structure in the Pharmaceuticals Industry

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1217 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Organizational Structure in the Pharmaceuticals Industry
Organizational Structure in the Pharmaceuticals Industry

Abstract
Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson are the largest and most successful pharmaceutical companies in the world today. Each company has a massive workforce and conducts business in countries all over the globe. Both companies have used a high degree of horizontal differentiation in order to manage their business units more effectively. Operating companies are grouped together by their function, as well as the type of product the produce. There are concerns about the lack of control that results from decentralization. The benefits, however, appear to outweigh the risks, as evidenced by the successes enjoyed by Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson.

Organizational Structure in the Pharmaceuticals Industry Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer are both pharmaceutical companies that can be found near the top of the Fortune 500 list. Johnson & Johnson was ranked 33 and Pfizer 50 on this year’s list (Fortune 500, 2010). The complexity of this industry requires a very large workforce with many specialized roles. More specialized roles in an organization call for more differentiation within the company. There is a great deal of all three types of differentiation within each company: horizontal differentiation, vertical differentiation, and spatial differentiation. This high level of differentiation results in a very complex organizational structure (Nelson & Quick, 2011).
Globalization presents significant challenges to all organizations that operate in many different countries. These challenges are typically created by the cultural differences that may exist among the countries in which a company operates. Hofstede believes work-related attitudes are formed by five dimensions of cultural differences. These dimensions are as follows: individualism vs. collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity vs. femininity, and time orientation (Nelson & Quick, 2011). It is



References: Besthof, Robert. (2009). Pfizer Makes Push in Ophthalmic Market With Restructuring, R&D Strategy. Ocular Surgery News. Retrieved October 13, 2010, from: http://www.osnsupersite.com/view.aspx?rid=42818 Business Wire. (2009, April 7). Pfizer Announces Operating Structure and Select Senior Leadership Posts to Be Effective Immediately Upon Close of Wyeth Acquisition. Retrieved October 13, 2010, from: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20090407005717/en/Pfizer-Announces-Operating-Structure-Select-Senior-Leadership Fortune 500. (2010). Retrieved October 7, 2010, from: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2010/industries/21/index.html Johnson & Johnson. (October 2010). Company Structure. Retrieved October 11, 2010, from: http://www.jnj.com/connect/about-jnj/company-structure Knowledge@Wharton. (2008, June 25). Johnson & Johnson CEO William Weldon: Leadershipin a Decentralized Company. Retrieved October 11, 2010, from: http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2003 Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2011). Oranizational behavior: Science, the real world, and you. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Does Pfizer need to change the structure of its organization? If so, what changes are…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Structure

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Altogether, there are about eight organizational structure types. Each company has to find a way of putting these “pieces of the puzzle” into one well thought-out outline to represent the necessary relationships. In this case, we’ll be looking at the divisional structure. According to the text, “as organizations grow and become increasingly diversified, they find that functional departments have difficulty managing a wide variety of products, customers, and geographic regions. In this case, organizations may restructure to group all functions into a single division and duplicate each of the functions across all the divisions (Bateman and Snell 8th edition, 2009).”…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charan, R., Drotter, S., & Noel, J. (2001). The Leadership Pipeline; How to Build the Leadership-Powered Company. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company.…

    • 15014 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Similarly, the role of the subsidiaries of an MNC will also affect how it is structured.(Leiponen and Helfat 2011,P-655) argue that the goals of innovation or research and development (R&D) department of a MNC will shape how the organization may want to locate and effectively structure these departments. When an organization’s R&D team is inclined to producing ‘imitative innovation output’, their research indicates a decentralized system is preferable to a…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organizational Structure

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Senge’s (1990) position is that the structures within organizations influence the behavior of its members: “Different people in the same structure tend to produce qualitatively similar results” (p.40)…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Research Report

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.…

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Oranizational Behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ecuador vs US

    • 2323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: -"Hofstede 's Cultural Dimensions: Understanding Workplace Values Around the World." Hofstede 's Cultural Dimensions. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Oct. 2014.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    & Organizational Studies 12 (4): 73-88. http://jlo.sagepub.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au (accessed June 16, 2011). Magala, S. 2009. Crosscultural life of social values and organizational analysis: An introduction to the special themed section. Organization Studies 30 (9): 925-931. Sage. http://oss.sagepub.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au (accessed June 23, 2011). McShane, S. L., A. Travaglione, and M. Olekalns. 2010a. Organisational behaviour on the pacific rim. 3rd edition. ed. North Ryde, N.S.W.: McGrawHill. McShane, S. L., A. Travaglione, and M. Olekalns. 2010b. Organisational behaviour on the pacific rim: Self assessment exercises. http://www.mcgraw-hill.com.au (accessed June 18, 2011). McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede 's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Human Relations 55 (1): 89. ProQuest. http://proquest.umi.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au (accessed June 24, 2011). Migliore, L. A. 2011. Relation between big five personality traits and hofstede 's cultural dimensions: Samples from the USA and india. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 18 (1): 38-54. Emerald. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13527601111104287 (accessed June 12, 2011). Minkov, M., and G. Hofstede. 2011. The evolution of hofstede 's doctrine. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 18 (1): 10-20. Emerald June 23, 2011). Munley, A. E. 2011. Culture differences in leadership. IUP Journal of Soft Skills 5 (1): 16-30. Business Source Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com (accessed June 12, 2011). Porter, L. W., and G. B. McLaughlin. 2006. Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly 17 (6): 559-576. Science Direct. http://www.sciencedirect.com (accessed June 23, 2011). Savage-Austin, A. P., and A. D. Honeycutt. 2011. Servant leadership: A phenomenological study of practices, experiences, organizational effectiveness, and barriers. Journal of Business & Economics Research 9 (1): 49. ProQuest. http://proquest.umi.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au (accessed June 19, 2011). Schein, E. H. 1985. Organizational culture and leadership. San Franciso: JosseyBass Publishers. Shao, L., and S. Webber. 2006. A cross-cultural test of the five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership '. Journal of Business Research 59 (8): 936-944. Science Direct. http://www.sciencedirect.com (accessed June 23, 2011). Smith, P. B., M. F. Peterson, and S. H. Schwartz. 2002. Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior: A 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 33 (2): 188-208. Sage. http://jcc.sagepub.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/ (accessed June 25, 2011). Solansky, S. T. 2008. Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 14 (4): 332-341.…

    • 3320 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture 's consequences: international differences in work-related values, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Horizontal Analysis Paper

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pfizer is Pfizer is the world’s leading pharmaceutical company with more than 122,000 employees worldwide and operations in over 150 countries. . Throughout the years, Pfizer has continued to discover, develop and bring to market innovative medicines that treat diseases and improve the quality of patients’ lives. In 2001, they adopted a new mission to…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best Practice Case Study

    • 4373 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Of course, these network characteristics-devising a novel approach to a complex problem and assembling the right expertise to solve it-did not arise on their own. Management made strategic decisions that encouraged such a network to develop. First, Novartis's organizational structure was deliberately designed to have permeable boundaries. The global oncology business unit, for instance, comprises marketing, sales, and research functions in different geographies. As Matter explains, "We bring together different disciplines, functions, and geographies to try to break up silos." Second, while many organizations' planning processes unwittingly compel functional- or business-unit heads to focus on their own objectives, Novartis takes a different approach. The company pushes executives to consider ways that unique packaging of expertise both within and outside the organization - could create new market opportunities to which they could respond. For example, the company routinely forn:is strategic alliances with industry partners and academic institutions to develop new products, acquire platform technologies, and access untapped markets. For instance, scientists in the company's disease area strategy group, which focuses on alliances and acquisitions for disease areas that are expected to drive growth, work closely together across boundaries that would separate them in most other companies. Using their extensive networks, they share…

    • 4373 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hr Strategy Pfizer

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    off 10,000 of its 100,000 employees worldwide, Pfizer had begun to shift its hiring and employee development strategy, says Chris Altizer, vice president of global leadership and talent development.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Detroit Electric

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ford and Detroit Electric are both car companies. The major difference is that Ford manufactures cars whereas Detroit Electric does not. Ford’s organizational structure will most likely resemble other manufacturers’ structure, i.e. functional departmentalization. A major disadvantage of this structure is that because specialists are working with and encouraging each other in their areas of expertise and interest, organizational goals may be sacrificed in favor of departmental goals; hence, the inability to coordinate efforts amongst competing department to achieve the goal of producing electric vehicles.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hofstede, G., (1980). “Culture’s Consequence: International Differences in Work Related Values.” Sage Publishing, Inc., Beverly Hills.…

    • 3312 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays