Preview

Negotiating Styles: High Pressure Tactics Used by Negotiators

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negotiating Styles: High Pressure Tactics Used by Negotiators
17 Negotiating style
 1) Listed below are the ten most common high-pressure tactics negotiators use. o 1 e) The shock opener = Make a ridiculous initial demand (or offer), but keep a straight face as you make it. This works particularly well on inexperienced opponents. o 2 d) The vinegar and honey technique = Make unreasonable demands early on in the negotiation. When you later 'see reason' and modify your demands, they'll be all the more welcome. o 3 b) The strictly off-limits ploy = Point out at the start that, though you are prepared to negotiate A. B. and C; X, Y and Z are definitely not negotiable. o 4 a) The take-it-or-leave-it challenge = Make it look as though you are ready to leave the negotiating table if your demands are not met, that you are not prepared to move an inch further. o 5 c) The I'll-have-to-check-with-head-office ploy = Having obtained a concession from your opponent, inform them that you need your boss's approval before you can do what they ask in return. o 6 g) The sorry-about-my-English ploy = Pretend not to understand any proposal you don't like the sound of. You'll make your opponent uncomfortable by forcing them to repeat it. o 7 j) The good cop, bad cop approach = One of your team is friendly and flexible, the other unpleasant and unreasonable. Your opponent will want to please Mr/Ms Nice to avoid Mr/Ms Nasty. o 8 h) The once-in-a-lifetime offer = Pressurise your opponent by suggesting that the offer you're making is only for a limited period and if they don't act quickly, they'll miss it. o 9 f) The salami technique = Don't make all your demands right at the start. Make a small demand and get agreement on it before you make the next, and the next o 10 i) The last-minute demand = After the deal has been done, make one modest extra demand in the hope that your opponent will not want to jeopardise1 the agreement for one small detail.
 2) How might you respond to each of the tactics in 1? Can you see any risks in using them

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Make a thorough assessment of the situation in order to be able have an easier transition into the negotiation process.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business 520 Assignment 5

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * Focus on interests, not positions – Understand the needs and interests of the clients instead of being concerned about title.…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Midwestern Art Museum

    • 3633 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Background The present paper reviews a case study as written by Lewicky, Saunders and Barry in the text Negotiations titled Midwestern::Contemporary Art, case number 6. Its focus is on a financial crisis that the museum is facing due to a donors failure to pay a five million dollar pledge. The donor was the museums previous president of the board of directors who had a falling out with the museum director over financial matters and felt minimized by the lack support by board members. The museum is in the process of completing a major capital project and faces the near term possibility of bankruptcy if the pledge is not fulfilled.…

    • 3633 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would suggest the best negotiating style to apply to this will be collaborative style. Participation in joint problem solving is key for me. Secondly discovering and solving the real interest of both parties is another advantage of this style when applied to the case in question. Collaborative bargaining is a generic term that describes a variety of bargaining methods: win-win bargaining, collegial bargaining, consensus bargaining, cooperative bargaining, integrative bargaining, collective gaining and interest-based negotiations.They all involve a two-way discussion with the goal of mutual gains between the parties…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2007). Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2006). Essentials of Negotiation, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill. Learning Solutions. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://digitalbookshelf.argosy.edu/…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prioritise Work Nvq 3

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If you don’t negotiate, you may find that you don’t meet the targets set or that you find yourself under extreme pressure.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Man

    • 4782 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Gates, S. (2011). The Negotiation Book: Your Definitive Guide To Successful Negotiating (1st ed.). United Kingdom, UK: John Wiley and Sons LTD.…

    • 4782 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Myti-Pet Case Report

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. How did you plan for the negotiation? Explain how you decided on a strategy?…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. What style of negotiation was this? If your style was not a principled negotiation explain why not.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alpha-Beta Exercise Hr595

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Our objectives and interests as a group were to behave collectively, formally, patiently, indirectly, unemotionally and passively. These goals conflicted with the other party’s position because they were the very opposite of those traits. Our opponents were rude, impatient, demanding, crude, Machiavellian, direct and emotional. The other party was interested in settling as quickly as possible and on their terms. We did not attempt to interject objective standards; we attempted to remain patient and indirect. Both parties were prepared prior to negotiation to address specific issues. Beta’s strategy was not to go into the negotiation and immediately deal with the issues at hand, but to be patient and ensure that the…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Negotiate ..................................................................................................................... 6  Calculate ...................................................................................................................... 7  Deal.............................................................................................................................. 7 …

    • 8352 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agulto's Bargaining Style

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why did you choose a particular bargaining style? Agulto chooses different bargaining style, first he used the hard-bargaining style, to intimidate the seller and to set a standard. Using hard bargaining style gives the advantage to the buyer, winning it at all cost. Then he talks to the seller like giving a commitment that if they sell us at a particular price we will order from them another sets of sack of rice. And we bombarded them with flinches or offers that will reach their concession.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Protecting yourself sometimes becomes a difficult task when you are on the opposite side from the “power”. You get become “panicky” or too accommodating, forgetting that you have something the other party wants, assets. A good way to overcome these issues is to stipulate a bottom line – what you consider the worst acceptable outcome. This is a good tool to resist pressure, especially if you have someone on your side to help reinforce that limit. On the counter side, this “help” can be costly (when it involves brokers, agents…) and, too rigid, limiting our imagination and creativity to invent other solutions that could better respond to both parties’ intentions. To overcome this “incapacitation” and to make the most of the whole negotiation process, you should know your BATNA – Best Alternative To a Negotiation Agreement. By know your BATNA (a measurement tool) that not only gives you better standards but is also more flexible then bottom line solution, it allows you to use imagination and invent other solutions that better satisfy our interests, but it may also be to uncertain, not giving you an actual limit.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negotiation Skills

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Negotiation involves a two-way communication and the outcome is influenced by the mindset, abilities, and techniques used by the parties of the negotiation. One guideline to the outcome of any negotiation is dependent upon getting the timing right. To achieve this try to organize and plan the circumstances for the negotiation beforehand. This also involves considering the possible outcomes of the negotiation to better understanding the variables that are most important. A second guideline during negotiation would be for all parties to evaluate themselves. A third guideline is to know what you are getting into and who you are dealing with. Another guideline is to be attentive and learn to listen well. Keep in mind that negotiating has to be a two-way communication to be effective - it will never work if the discussion is one- way traffic. The last guideline is to be willing to walk away by never being pressured to win a negotiation.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics