Letter to a character

Dear Juror 3: One of the best character traits is morality. Perceiving right from wrong and understanding the ethical code accepted in society are imperative in every person. Having a sense of justice without biases or prejudices as a hindrance are contributing factors in a satisfactory juror. In my opinion, bigotry is unacceptable; however, I do find an unwavering determination admirable. Being able to affirm what one personally believes in should always be looked upon no matter what the reasons are pertaining to one’s views. Though said reasons may be a result of a prior bias, it is still commendable for someone to firmly state their beliefs in a hostile environment where their opinion is the minority. First and foremost, I think you are a very interesting man. From the initial meeting when you were first introduced to the other jurors I found you fascinating. Your very first exchange of words with juror 2 fascinated me the most. Though your words were not overtly harsh they held a slight vindictive quality. It was then I knew you would be a character worthy of my attention. A quite entertaining character you turned out to be too. When juror 8 first stated his reluctance in sending the kid to his death, you like all the other jurors expressed surprise and disbelief. You, however, were one of the more vocal of the bunch about your disagreement. You played devil’s advocate to a majority of juror 8’s points; points that for some would cause doubt. For example, the issue with the knife. In court, a key point for the prosecution was the rarity of the knife used in the murder. Juror 8’s presentation of his own knife, an exact copy of the “rare” knife like the boy’s, angered you. Juror 8 at that moment weakened one of the prosecution’s strongest arguments in its case. Your reaction to this new development was complete denial. No amount of logic from the other jurors was able to pacify your growing exasperation at juror 8’s “bright trick,” as you stated.