Preview

12 Angry Men - Jury Characters Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men - Jury Characters Essay Example
Juror # 1: He is the foreman on this jury. He takes his role very seriously but is seen at times to lose control of the proceedings of the group of jury members that he is supposed to oversee.
Juror # 2: He seems to be the most timid and nervous member of the jury. He is easily swayed by the opinion of others.
Juror # 3: He is the most vociferous member of the jury. He has some very strong opinions which at times appear to not be backed by any logic. His character shows some signs of sadism ingrained in him.
Juror # 4: He is a strong character who presents himself and his thoughts in a respectable manner at all times. He’s main concern is facts and he’s opinion is not swayed by any non-factual information about the case.
Juror # 5: He has lived in slums for a large part of his life and appears to suffer from a sense of low esteem as a result, which becomes obvious at various parts of the proceedings.
Juror # 6: He is a house painter who is happy to be a part of the jury as it means that he doesn’t have to work. He is accepting of views which differ from his own.
Juror # 7: He portrays an air of indifference to the case. He’s main concern is whether the proceedings will end before the baseball match whose tickets he has bought, starts.
Juror # 8: He is the only member who voted “not guilty” in the first voting. He’s main concern was that the trial was not handled in a proper manner by the defendants lawyer. He wanted to examine the evidence more thoroughly to see whether there was any room for doubt about the case.
Juror # 9: He is a mild mannered, gentle old man with a very keen sense of observation. He also values the efforts of juror # 8 and supports him with his own perceptive inputs.
Juror # 10: He is an abhorrent character whose bigotry becomes more and more obvious as the movie progresses.
Juror # 11: He is a European immigrant with a love for the American legal system.
Juror # 12: He works in an advertising agency and is often distracted from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The leader in the beginning of the deliberation was the high school football coach, juror number one. He tries to keep order in the hostile jury room. The role evolve to the Architect in the course of the film because he was the only odd ball in the room who vote not guilty and he manage to change everyone vote by the end of the film. His successful strategies for leading the group include encouraging equal and inclusive participation and taking time to deliberate slowly.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Juror #8 displayed a style of leadership that some would say was democratic. He is liberal-minded, courageous, and a decent man.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When someone gives their opinion, juror number eight discusses these opinions with them, pointing out various elements in their judgements. Another maintenance role that is fulfilled within the juror’s group is the standard setter. This role is played out by juror number one, who is also the foreman. At the beginning of the meeting, juror number one makes sure to get everyone on track and tells the men exactly…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juror 3 is a strong, forceful man who refuses to alter his vote. Being very opinionated, he looks at the evidence “you sat right there in court and heard the same things, I did” (14) and doesn’t think beyond the facts. Still haunted by his own son, he verbally assaults the other jurors with mighty tone that knowing that a kid like his son is going to be locked up. Juror 3 and his son had some troubles with their relationship in the past. Juror 3 comes right out and says that he was going to make a man out of his son or bust him trying. Which in the end his son slaps his father across the face finally beating him back for the first time and fled town; since that day they haven’t spoken or seen each other. Since juror 3 feels that his son was not the way he was supposed to turn out, his feelings of his son were building up inside of him and were faced towards the case of the convicted.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 8th Juror is a key character throughout the play. He is the only dissenter who votes ‘not guilty’ in the very beginning and says ‘it’s not easy to raise hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.’ As a logical, gentle and thoughtful character, the 8th Juror slowly works out the way to make the jury rethink the case and the possibility of the boy not killing his…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3rd Juror: 3rd Juror is a small business owner. He proudly says that he started his business from scratch and now employs thirty-four workers. He has a bad relationship with his own son.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juror 8 simply puts out questions and asks people to challenge their own beliefs. He is prepared to allow anyone to keep their own opinion without compromising his own.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juror 5 lived in slums and could relate to the accused but he chose to vote guilty as he felt attacked by the other jurors…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury and Angriest Juror

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juror #Eight is such a great man to turn someone’s life upside down and make him survive such a horrible penalty such as death penalty which no one’s get a chance to correct his mistakes no more, or even regret it, because it just ends the life of that person forever.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Now you can see the differences between Jurors Three and Eight. These two jurors are very different , especially when it comes to their personalities. Despite their differences they do have some similarities, which are stated in this essay. After reading this paper, you should better understand these two very different, but similar…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1)Because he is the first to agree with juror number eight , deciding that there is not enough evidence to sentence the young boy to death.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    represents different personalities and beliefs with each juror. A young man’s life is at stake, most of the…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juror 7 is disappointing because he selfishly wants to go to the ball game. Initially he believes that the judgement will be made rapidly and he becomes increasingly frustrated when it is evident that the vote won’t be unanimous. The disappointing aspect is that he has a voice but lacks any reasoning, dismissive of logic in preference to a speedy outcome. Some may suggest that he is simple, but he is so caught up in his own world that he refuses to see or acknowledge the emotional needs of others. He may well offer chewing gum to those around, but the reality is he has no real concern for the needs of others. He is blinded by the immediate, unable to see beyond his own needs. It is disappointing that he is depicted as the man on the street, the knock about bloke off to the ball game who is largely inoffensive. Yet his apathy is offensive as it presents a narrow world where people do not care for others.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juror #3 came into this trial with a moral dilemma long before hearing the facts of the case. Given his past experiences, he would feel more inclined to vote guilty as to punish and make an example of this boy so that other kids would think twice. In this case if the jury decided on a guilty verdict, the defendant would be put to death. People might make rash decisions based…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. This is one of the reasons why we are strong. We should not make it a personal thing.” Juror #11 is amplifying the importance in the civic duty they were partaking in, and is encouraging the jury to make their decision based on the facts presented to them, not from their personal beliefs. While some juror’s, especially Juror #3, included their personal beliefs in their decisions throughout the deliberation, many realized the importance of their job, and looked deep into the evidence presented to them before they reached a…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays